Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[ltseung888]

LT,

I will give this a try.
I am going to be busy for a bit though.

The Observer

Joule Thief Charger Video on the Internet

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUqrGLrPnso
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgfBWgoxy0A

Dear Observer,
I found these two videos via a google search on “joule thief charger”.  Hope that helps.

[ltseung888]

Is the Joule Thief a Lead-Out Energy device?

The best analogy is with the pulse pushed pendulum (diagram below).  One winding of the toroidal coil provides pulsing.  The other winding extracts energy.  Lead-Out electron-motion energy will be available even if the pulsing frequency is NOT at the resonance frequency.

With any non-resonant pulsing, the analogy is pushing the pendulum at the wrong time.  The amplitude of the swing may not go higher or the lead-out energy into the system will not be at its optimum. 

This may explain why the Joule Thief is easier to build and demonstrate compared with the Stan Meyer Circuit or the Bob Boyce Hex Controller.  Energy is extracted as soon as the pulsing starts.  The extracted energy contains both supplied energy and lead-out energy!

Hope this provides a much clearer conceptual picture.

[ltseung888]

The Gadgetmail Overunity Heater

Cheung: “It is a pity that Gadgetmail got cancer and did not pursue his OU prize entry.  His work was based on the Joule Thief.  You are now discussing the Joule Thief in this thread.”

Tseung: “Would you like to pick up where Gadgetmail left off?  You can always donate or share the prize money with Gadgetmail.  The extra income and encouragement will help him.”

Cheung: “I may consider that.  Here is his circuit diagram.  Can you explain it with your Lead-out energy theory to give us a clear understanding?  Do you think that he already achieved OU?  Or do you think you can do better with the Double Joule Thief technique from Observer?”

[ltseung888]

Explaining the Gadgetmail circuit from the Lead-Out Energy theory

The Primary Side is a LCR resonance circuit.  The Secondary Side is also a LCR resonance circuit.  The transistor provides Pulsed DC.  We know from our own experiments that the toroid will play a part in the resonance (ferromagnetic resonance).

I believe that the Gadgetmail device involves a careful selection and balance (and some luck) to get a good amplification of power via appropriate resonance.  Blindly building a device from the values in the circuit diagram may not achieve the correct result.  Physical dimensions and the toroid properties will affect result.  (So would other additional circuit elements.)

Be prepared to tune.  It may be a good idea to have tunable capacitors, inductors and resistors during the test stages.  That may help to cut down the trial and error swapping time.  Hope the diagrams and explanations help.

It is clear to me that the groups in Hong Kong/Shenzhen managed to get some resonance results that could demonstrate overunity.  It was much hardwork â€" painstaking and painful experiments.  No wonder that they did not want to share the results until they have products on the market.

[ltseung888]

Comments on explanation

Cheung: “I love your explanations.  You broke the Gadgetmail circuit into two LCR resonance circuits.  Your lead-out energy theory states that pulsing at the resonance frequency can lead-out electron-motion energy.  That appears to be confirmed.  The study should now be on exactly what type of resonance we are talking about.”

Lee: “The frequency is NOT the standard LCR A frequency.  It is not the ferromagnetic frequency of the toroid.  The evident so far is that presence of LCR resonance circuits appear to create a resonance environment.  The present technique is to examine the waveforms and show that resonant behavior does occur when we have pulsing LCR circuits.”

Cheung: “That is already a helpful light in the dark.  The waveforms can help to determine the existence of resonance and increase in Output energy.”

Lee: “That is the difficulty of overunity research from day one.  What is the resonance condition and how to get to it?   Many researchers found certain conditions.  Others have difficulty in replicating them because the replication conditions were not identical.  Loading a successful resonant situation with test equipment or extra electronics could change that successful resonant situation.  That is why it is so easy to debunk the overunity inventions.”

Tseung: “I think the Hong Kong/Shenzhen groups are doing the thing correctly this time.  They can determine the conditions exactly and then mass produce actual products in a strictly controlled environment.  There is no need for replicators to confirm success.  For example, many worked on the Joule Thief.  Many achieved success in prolonging the battery life.  Few can produce results such as Bill â€" lighting 400 LEDs.”

Cheung: “Now that I understand it is a resonance behavior, I shall not feel too bad if the first results do not show overunity.  It took you a couple of weeks tuning the Tong Wheel before achieving the overunity demonstration condition.  I am prepared for many hours of tuning with the Gadgetmail heater.”

Lee: “Are you going to share the results with the World?  Or will you manufacture products like the others first?”

Cheung: “I don’t know yet.  I have not even started on the experiments.  There are pressures in life.  My wife wants financial security.  I need to take care of my aging parents.  We shall see.”

Tseung: “It does not matter to me.  If you produce products, the World will benefit.  You and your love ones deserve to get benefits too.”