Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[XS-NRG]

Good Points NickZ

Yeah, it makes a lot of us wonder why certain guys spend a LOT OF TIME & effort telling us it won't work & for us to NOT EVEN TRY!!!

.

Many, MANY have tried, all have failed and i have already told you why.
If you want to chase a ghost for the rest of your life, then so be it.

If it worked the way most people are hoping, Steven Mark would have been dead.
He isn't and that's because he has nothing of intrest.

Your better off researching the dead inventors....trust me.
Most of them died for a reason.

[Mr_Video]

If it worked the way most people are hoping, Steven Mark would have been dead.
He isn't

and your proof that he's still alive is..... what ?

[XS-NRG]

Your right he could be dead by now.

[ltseung888]

Improvement and Demonstration on July 19, 2010


We tried the three layer toroid.  The first attempt was to put the Joule Thief at the lowest layer and two transformer type windings as two top layers.  There were some improvements but the top most layer showed significant decrease in induced voltage.


We then put the Joule Thief as the middle layer.  To our greatest delight, the Output shot up.  The continuous Output Power was 56 watts.  The steady AC Output Voltage was 14 Volts even though we varied the load â€" resistors and LEDs.  The Input Power from the 1.1V AA battery was less than 0.4 watts.  That gave us a COP of greater than 160.


It looked like we could get closer to resonance and extract much more lead-out energy with the new arrangement.  In a few days, our Output Power increased from a few watts to over 50 watts.  Our team is extremely optimistic in producing a 1KW lead-out energy device in the very near future. The following are a list of possible areas of further research.

1.   Size of the Toroid â€" Bigger appears to be better.
2.   Number of turns of wire in the Toroid â€" More appears to be better.
3.   Core material of the Toroid â€" No concrete data to show direction yet.
4.   The use of capacitors in the Joule Thief â€" appears to help
5.   The transistors in the Joule Thief â€" the larger ones appear to help
6.   The LCR circuit in the Primary of the Joule Thief â€" tuning helps
7.   The LCR circuit in the Secondary of the Joule Thief â€" tuning helps
8.   The LCR circuit in the Secondary of the Transformer â€" major factor
9.   The number of turns of wire in the Secondary of the Transformer â€" important to connect the right way â€" mixing clockwise and anti-clockwise will lower output.
10.   The use of thin copper wire appears to be much better than the lamp wire.
11.   Use of Signal Generator instead of battery â€" can vary frequency.
12.   The lower the frequency, the higher the lead-out energy (results so far).
13.   Higher L and Higher C values appear to lead-out more energy.
14.   The Pulsing can either be AC or Pulsed DC.
15.   The present Joule Thief and Transformer arrangement appeared to have build-in feedback mechanism.
16.   The Output is capable of recharging batteries now.  We can already demonstrate Battery A recharging Battery B and vice versa.  A few (6 LED lights) could be on all the time.

The chance of our team producing a 1KW lead-out device for the poor countries within three months is excellent.  We want to share everything so that products can come out quickly to benefit the World.

[FatBird]

That is SUPER Lawrence.  Thank you for sharing your data to help the world.

Is your TPU (Toroid) Air Core or steel core?

Thank you sir.

.