Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[The Observer]

Smoky,

- thus it takes a lot of power for a coil-speaker to drive itself without a magnet.

Yep... that's part 1... now Part 2

The 'iron' inside the coil that is attached to the diaphragm.
      Why 'iron' inside the coil?... and...  could you drive the a speaker without the iron?

The Observer

[Pirate88179]

Yes you could drive a speaker without the iron core, but it would not be efficient at all.  The same way you can make a JT circuit with out a core.  If you have enough windings, it can be done as many have done so.  The iron magnetizes and de-magnetizes very quickly without retaining any of the residual magnetic field.  There is no magic in this as I see it, just basic electronics. I can run my Bedini motors without a core and have done so.  In some applications, no core is actually desirable. (JonnyDavro's one magnet no bearing Bedini motor for example)

Bill

[sm0ky2]

Smoky,

Yep... that's part 1... now Part 2

The 'iron' inside the coil that is attached to the diaphragm.
      Why 'iron' inside the coil?... and...  could you drive the a speaker without the iron?

The Observer

yes.  there was a time when speakers did not have this piece.
its not just any iron, it is a soft iron that can respond to a wide range of frequencies. the purpose for adding this, if you look at how the coil is wound: the iron sits at the base of the coil, and recieves the full induction of the EMF. This is like a "kick plate". the two magnetic fields (magnet and iron) push and pull against one another to move the cone.

This is also accomplished in some speakers, by use of a secondary coil, through which a DC current is sent to create a biasing field. These speakers draw more direct power to run them, but require less amplification of the signal. these are generally used in applications where the use of an amplifier circuit is impracticle.

[ltseung888]

Hi, guys, since you are dealing with transformers in this thread, would you like to examine the idea mentioned by Bruce TPU, (Thane Heins BI-TOROID TRANSFORMER,) which begins here (Reply#4):
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7833.msg243399#msg243399
My lack of knowledge about transformers does not allow me to undertake such experiments. Sorry.
Q

Thank you for the valuable information.  It looks like some of the information there is patented.

I have been praying for Devine Guidance.  Should I patent the lead-out energy technology?  Should I give it freely to the World?  The answer came from the photos and videos from the poor areas in the World.  They do not have electricity nor running water.

In a single sentence, the technology is:
Leading out Electron Motion Energy via resonance circuits.

We have experimented with the two following scenarios:
1.   A toroid transformer with LCR oscillating circuits in the Primary and the Secondary limb.  The Input Power (starting power) is from a signal generator that can generate 10 Volts peak-to-peak.  It is similar to the Thane Heins Bi-Toroid Transformer.
2.   A Joule Thief type arrangement with the Input Power (starting power) from a battery or from a signal generator.  It is similar to the Gadgetmail 1.5 V heater.

The preliminary results indicate that both Thane Heins and Gadgetmail devices are NOT hoaxes.  With the correct configuration and loopback mechanisms, we can lead-out (or draw-in) as much energy as desired.

Many different toroids, winding techniques, LCR values, shapes, dimensions etc. are possible.  The major theoretical breakthrough is that â€" electron motion energy is always available.  Many arrangements can lead-out such energy continuously and loopback is possible.  When not at resonance, the mechanisms may counter each other.  (We even managed to get zero power output in one configuration!).   At controlled resonance, the mechanisms can loopback and produce the characteristic exponential increase in amplitude (or keep drawing-in energy until the electronics fail).

With Devine Help and Guidance, we shall lay out the technology and the implementation plans to produce the FLEET devices that will cost less than HK$200 in material.  Such FLEET devices should produce enough electricity for the average home.  The expected life of such devices is ten years.

The information is likely to “break” the Tong Wheel Patents and the Thane Heins Patents.  Is it the will of the Almighty?  Through the humble and lowly hands of mine â€" benefit the World, including the poorest families.  The poor villagers can be taught to wind the toroids and set up the circuits.  With infinite lead-out energy available to them (and no oil interests to suppress them), their life style will change for the better within a few years.  Will anyone take on the task of developing model farms, model villages, model cities etc assuming infinite energy is available??

[FatBird]

Thank you for all you do Lawrence & for wanting to help the world in need.

We are looking forward to hearing more about your great inventions sir.

.