Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[ltseung888]

First FLEET prototype for USA

Just finished building and testing the first protoype to bring to USA.

The construction is the 3 layer Tseung winding technique with the Joule Thief layer sandwiched between two transformer windings.  A ferrite core toroid of diameter 1.2 inch was used.

To my surprise and delight, the device showed overunity without adding the capacitors nor feedback.

The decision is to freeze this prototype so that we are guaranteed to have something to show in USA.  The subsequent prototypes will have better features and performances. 

*** Some unknowns in USA are the two oscilloscopes and the data logger.  How will they affect the resonance???

[ltseung888]

Second Prototype for USA

The second prototype used part of the configuration from gadgetmail.  There were 11 turns wound with the Joule Thief technique.  There were 22 turns wound with the transformer technique.

Initially, the LED at the secondary did not even light.  The Vpp with no load was 7.6V.  The circuit was set up with a 100 variable resistor at the secondary.  After tuning, I got the following:

Input Voltage Vpp = 1.1V  Vrms = 16mV
Input Current  Ipp = 64mA Irms = 8mA  (current obtained from voltage across a 1 ohm resistor)

Output Voltage  Vpp = 3.76V   Vrms = 320mV
Output Current  Ipp = 0.56A    Irms  = 24mA  (current obtained from voltage across a 10 ohm resistor)

The estimated Output Power (peak-to-peak) = 2.1 watts
The estimated COP (peak-to-peak) = 30

More work will be done on this prototype. 

[rave154]

oh dear.......chris....now i see..

hes basing his outputs wattage and therefore his COP.....on the peak voltage & peak current

[ltseung888]

oh dear.......chris....now i see..

hes basing his outputs wattage and therefore his COP.....on the peak voltage & peak current

That is the simple, quick method.  You can use the same estimation for Input and Output Power.  For comparison purposes, this will work.

The exact method should be the integration of the area under the instantaneous power curves.  My inexpensive oscilloscope did not have that function.  (Or I have not correctly linked the information from the oscilloscope to my computer yet.)

However, one can estimate (as I stated multiple times) from either the peak-to-peak Voltage and Current values or the RMS Voltage and Current values.  Even better is to observe and compare the Instantaneous Input Power and the Instantaneous Output Power Curves.  That is the reason for getting two oscilloscopes.

The involvement of the top Universities with their more powerful oscilloscopes and data loggers will verify and confirm the overunity results.  My task is to provide the inexpensive (less than HK$20) prototypes for them to double and triple check.

Please pile more insults together with ChristC et al.  Tell his boss that you all tried your best to discredit the lead-out energy theory.  Unfortunately, it can be verified by a less than HK$20 device worldwide.

[minde4000]

@ltseung888

Could you demonstrate OU by using higher voltage input setup.. lets say 5VDC.. 9VDC or 12VDC?

What happens then? I am sure that would require a bigger toroid to avoid saturation and other stuff but if you cannot get OU using higher input power then there has got to be something fishy here...

You input uses 1 ohm - so you get real input nubers but output is measured thru 10 ohm.. shouldnt you divide your output numbers by 10? Sry if I am wrong on this one.

Minde