Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[XS-NRG]

oh look there is that "resonating ignition coil" guy again.
ignition coils are not designed for resonance operation fool.
they work on inductive kickback but your knowledge doesn't go that far.
the world is full of dumb ass people!!

Keep joining the old Tseung that's your spot right there bud.

[Poit]

oh look there is that "resonating ignition coil" guy again.
ignition coils are not designed for resonance operation fool.
they work on inductive kickback but your knowledge doesn't go that far.
the world is full of dumb ass people!!

Keep joining the old Tseung that's your spot right there bud.

Why do you have to be so rude?

[ltseung888]

After reading most of this thread, I am yet to see any evidence for over unity. Oscilloscopes are all very well, but that doesn't prove over unity.

My understanding of "Over Unity" is that "Unity" = 100% and "Over" is above that 100% threshold. So you get more out that you put in.

ltseung888 uses solar panels and batteries in his "proof".

I don't mean to come across like I am attacking the guy, but it frustrates the hell out of me to see him go on and on about "Over unity" with no evidence.

(I could be wrong). But it seems like its just a JT circuit, which is NOT over unity. Seeing the pictures in ltseung888's last post, I see a toroid, a transistor, a battery and LED's. All of which constitutes a JT, nothing special, nothing over unity here.

What am I missing here?

You missed a lot.

Start from reading:

1068, 1069, 1070, 1113, 1120, 1127, 1152 and 1156

Try to answer the question:

If Energy can be lead-out or brought-in from the surrounding by a device, does it mean that device is theoretically possible?  That device will not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.

Please post your answer and we can have meaningful discussions.

[Poit]

You missed a lot.

Start from reading:

1068, 1069, 1070, 1113, 1120, 1127, 1152 and 1156

Try to answer the question:

If Energy can be lead-out or brought-in from the surrounding by a device, does it mean that device is theoretically possible?  That device will not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.

Please post your answer and we can have meaningful discussions.

I understand what you are getting at. So why do you need batteries and solar panels in your demonstrations? if the device is >100% efficiency, loop the output back into the input, I have not seen you do this once!

"If I can experiment in USA, you can too.  Why not build yourself a FLEET prototype to confirm overunity?" You are using a battery! there is no over unity, there is energy from the battery.... ill say it again, over unity = over 100% efficiency.

Please don't ignore my questions. Just so we are clear what the questions are. 1: Why do you use a battery to power your "over unity" device? 2: why do you ask the forum to replicate "over unity" when you arn't demonstrating it. How can we?

[FatBird]

For those that don't already know, there are 4 Trolls hitting this thread.

For those that don't know what a Troll is, they:

1.  Troll around Free Energy Forums to discourage good ideas.
2.  Value their paycheck more than they value free energy for the world.
3.  Try to get inventors to chase insignificant rabbit trail ideas to waste time.
4.  Try to discredit and ridicule good honest inventors that are trying to help the world.
5.  Are generally paid by Big Oil Corporations so nothing interferes with their HUGE FAT PROFITS.
6.  Try to cause anger and fights to get people discouraged and fight with each other so they give up and go away.


.