Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[ltseung888]

To complete the theory, I bought a water + air pump toy gun at the 99 market.

I am waiting for the four tuning forks on resonance boxes.  The demonstration equipment includes:

1. Water+air toy gun
2. Solar Pendulum toy
3. Tuning forks on resonance boxes
4. Tong Wheel (Video)
5. FLEET

[tagor]

To complete the theory, I bought a water + air pump toy gun at the 99 market.

I am waiting for the four tuning forks on resonance boxes.  The demonstration equipment
2. Solar Pendulum toy

I looked this Solar Pendulum toy every day for 4 years and ....
( I have many of them )

I never seen OU on this toy !!

is it possible to improve this toy ?
can you make a video with some proof ?

[utilitarian]

can you make a video with some proof ?

I see you are new to Lawrence-think.  There is no need for a scientific experiment measuring energy in versus energy out.  The proof is already there.  Here is how it goes.

1.  Lawrence proposes lead out conjecture and concludes it cannot be wrong.
2.  Lawrence notes that many people make overunity claims.
3.  Lawrence concludes that all theoretical overunity devices use his theory, and because his theory cannot be wrong, all such devices are actually overunity.
4.  Lawrence brands the solar pendulum an overunity device that uses his theory, and it is therefore overunity, just like all the "hundreds" of other overunity devices in the world.

You doubt this?  Come on, with hundreds of other overunity devices, surely this is overunity also.

If you really want proof, Lawrence can take a photograph of random people standing next to the pendulum toy.  Surely people would not pose with the device if it was not overunity.

Not convinced?  Well, Lawrence can print out a Word document with measurements of energy in versus energy out and place it next to the toy, and have a gullible student read them out loud on video, clearly proving its overunity status.  Will that convince you?

Did I mess up anywhere or is this about right?

[ltseung888]

I looked this Solar Pendulum toy every day for 4 years and ....
( I have many of them )

I never seen OU on this toy !!

is it possible to improve this toy ?
can you make a video with some proof ?

Dear Tagor,

Please read reply 1304 on page 87.

[ltseung888]

I see you are new to Lawrence-think.  There is no need for a scientific experiment measuring energy in versus energy out.  The proof is already there.  Here is how it goes.

1.  Lawrence proposes lead out conjecture and concludes it cannot be wrong.
2.  Lawrence notes that many people make overunity claims.
3.  Lawrence concludes that all theoretical overunity devices use his theory, and because his theory cannot be wrong, all such devices are actually overunity.
4.  Lawrence brands the solar pendulum an overunity device that uses his theory, and it is therefore overunity, just like all the "hundreds" of other overunity devices in the world.

You doubt this?  Come on, with hundreds of other overunity devices, surely this is overunity also.

If you really want proof, Lawrence can take a photograph of random people standing next to the pendulum toy.  Surely people would not pose with the device if it was not overunity.

Not convinced?  Well, Lawrence can print out a Word document with measurements of energy in versus energy out and place it next to the toy, and have a gullible student read them out loud on video, clearly proving its overunity status.  Will that convince you?

Did I mess up anywhere or is this about right?

Dear utilitarian,

You missed the parts that:

1.   I have nine working FLEET prototypes in my possession now.   Eight were made in Hong Kong and one was made in USA.

2.   A FLEET prototype that can light up a 108 LED Christmas tree is being demonstrated at the Inno Tech Design Expo 2010 in Hong Kong from Dec 2-4.  Over 10,000 visitors will see it.

3.   Two workshops have been held at Hong Kong University.  One of the students, Felix, produced a FLEET prototype with Output Power greater than 10 watts and COP > 200 peak-to-peak.  Hong Kong University under the guidance of Mr. Aaron Quant and Prof. Dennis Leung can “mass- produce” such demonstration prototypes.

4.   Any top scientific institution with two oscilloscopes, a signal generator, a DC power supply, a data logger and trained staff can test the working prototypes either from myself or from Hong Kong University.  The Institution is free to publish its independent findings.

5.   You do not need to believe anything now.  Just wait for the confirmations from HKU, UCI, MIT, Stanford, Tsinghua and other top Universities.  But the simplest experiment is the Observer tuning fork resonance.  If you are prepared to spend US$400, get 40 sets from China.  Put them in a quiet room and strike one with the supplied hammer.  Check whether the resulting sound is louder and lasts longer.  Scratch your head and ask where does the extra energy come from?

We are in a gravitational field.  The Sun attracts the Earth; the Earth attracts the Moon; every object attracts every other object.  In Physics, that attraction is called a force.  When any object moves, there will be a displacement.  Work is done or Energy is exchanged.  Work = Force x Displacement using vector arithmatic.  There is plenty of gravitational energy for us to use.  It is a matter of building a lead-out or bring-in energy machine to use such energy.

This is the simple God given truth.  Someone pointed it out.  That someone was Mr. Lee Cheung Kin in Dec. 2004.

Lawrence Tseung
Director
Help Seedlings Innovate Foundation Limited (Hong Kong)