Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

Started by ltseung888, February 24, 2010, 03:55:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

PhysicsProfessor

  Today I received Prototype A, sent to my address from Irvine, California.
Thank you, Lawrence, it has arrived.

  I inspected the circuit for any poor connections -- everything looked fine.

Next I inserted one AA battery into the circuit as outlined by Lawrence, and both LED's lit up.  So the circuit checked out with this simple test.

I immediately analyzed voltage drops using a multimeter... very interesting.  Next -- oscilloscope and other studies.  But I will refrain from posting final results here until the results are complete.
--Professor J.

Omnibus

Quote from: PhysicsProfessor on December 29, 2010, 09:01:47 PM
  Today I received Prototype A, sent to my address from Irvine, California.
Thank you, Lawrence, it has arrived.

  I inspected the circuit for any poor connections -- everything looked fine.

Next I inserted on AA battery into the circuit as outlined by Lawrence, and both LED's lit up.  So the circuit checked out with this simple test.

I immediately analyzed voltage drops using a multimeter... very interesting.  Next -- oscilloscope and other studies.  But I will refrain from posting final results here until the results are complete.
--Professor J.

Good luck. I wish you could have a way to contact prof. Kincheloe (an old friend of prof. Sturrock and a professor emeritus at Stanford). He would bevery interested in these studies.

Bob Boyce

Quote from: PhysicsProfessor on December 29, 2010, 09:01:47 PM
  Today I received Prototype A, sent to my address from Irvine, California.
Thank you, Lawrence, it has arrived.

  I inspected the circuit for any poor connections -- everything looked fine.

Next I inserted one AA battery into the circuit as outlined by Lawrence, and both LED's lit up.  So the circuit checked out with this simple test.

I immediately analyzed voltage drops using a multimeter... very interesting.  Next -- oscilloscope and other studies.  But I will refrain from posting final results here until the results are complete.
--Professor J.
I also received a package today, containing Prototype C and the components set. Thank you Lawrence.

Upon inspection, I found a broken connection. One resistor lead was hanging loose, and one terminal of the potentiometer was unconnected with traces of solder on it. It looks to be where the resistor lead should have been connected.

I performed the powerup test as directed, and both LEDs lit up. This was tested with the resistor lead unconnected, and connected. An average operating frequency shift was observed when the resistor lead was connected.

Power consumption was tested, but no further testing or tuning was attempted at this point. I prefer to wait for verification of the loose resistor lead placement before proceeding any further.

Bob Boyce

utilitarian

Quote from: ltseung888 on December 29, 2010, 10:23:29 AM
@Bob Boyce, thank you very much for posting here.  You have added much value in a couple of posts.

I would like to emphasize that I also do not believe in “free energy” or that the Law of Conservation of Energy can be violated.  With the Lee-Tseung Lead-out or Bring-in Energy theory, energy is brought-in from the surrounding environment.  The six conclusive experiments to be done in USA in 2011 will prove that. . .

2.   Gravitational energy can be brought-in via the pulse-pushed pendulum.  The mathematics should that two parts of horizontal energy can lead-out one part of vertical of gravitational energy.  The two stage Milkovic pendulum is a good example.
on the tuning techniques used and to be used.  There will be plenty of fun and learning.

These are not consistent statements.  How can you say you do not believe in free energy, and at the same time promote this "energy from gravity?"

It is known that gravity is not depleted over time.  An object of the same mass will continue to exert the exact same gravitational pull.  So where does your "energy from gravity" come from?  What source is being depleted to make this energy?

You have never answered this question, though I have asked many many times.  Could you please provide an answer?

The Observer

Charlie,

My last post was addressed to 3 people.
I separated each note with a ----------------------------------------------------
I first addressed Bob, then addressed you, then addressed LT (Lawerance Tseung).

Knowing this, I hope you can make more sense of my last post.

Can you now 'see' the Embedded Magnets in a Common Transformer Core now?
That's how our conversation started.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PhysicsProf/ Bob,

Thanks for you posts.

As both of you might have surmised, I believe energy can be harvested from Ferromagnetic Substances.
That is, free electron spin produces a magnetic field that can be utilized.
As opposed to Paid For Electron 'Spin', a coil hooked to a battery.

I claim that Conservation of Energy is not adhered to when today's Physicists consider the operation of a common speaker.
In short, a Common Speaker that does not use Ferromagnetic Substances (a Magnet & a Core) takes a lot more energy to run.

Here are the fine points.

1. Test the output of the Regular Speaker for a given tone.

2. Take that Regular Speaker and
    a. replace the Magnet with a Coil
    b. take out the Ferro out of the coil connected to the amp.

3. Now power up your coil (magnet replacement) and play the tone again.
    a. you will need Paid For Electron Spin to run the Coil (magnet replacement)
    b. you will need more Paid For Electron Spin to run the Coil (connected to the amp) to get the same tone.
    c. the same tone takes WAY more energy to produce now !
    d. this is the energy required to make the tone (TRUE CONSERVATION of ENERGY)

4. The Energy it takes to set-up a Dynamic Magnetic System has been ignored by the scientific community.

5. Simply replacing the magnet with a more powerful magnet results in a louder sound.
   a. the extra energy comes from the more powerful magnet.

If you read my all my posts, and the subsequent responses... you will find that I pretty much stand alone in my assertions.
I not only hope you gentlemen have success with your test, but also perhaps that you understand what I am talking about.

GodSpeed,
                The Observer