Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[XS-NRG]

I have, as I've already shown. You don't, clown.

i guess you didn't see it then.

So now you are claiming that these things ARE OU and that fact makes you a Clown just like Lawrence.
He is too claiming OU and spreading BS among our fellow researchers.

[Poit]

There is a very simple reason why Lawrence can't make his device self run, because he can't - he is wasting his time and everyone elses time.

Mr Lawrence wants money (like so many others) and he is deploying a very good strategy to get it. Just like "Terrorism", the war is endless, because the enemy is fictional. Like wise for Mr Lawrence, the "enemy" in his case is OU, he will lead on his investors and bleed them dry... only to show excuses in the wake.

Wake up people, Lawrence is a scammer, plain and simple.

[Omnibus]

i guess you didn't see it then.

So now you are claiming that these things ARE OU and that fact makes you a Clown just like Lawrence.
He is too claiming OU and spreading BS among our fellow researchers.

I didn't see it, you're right, clown. Where have you shown any argument at all, clown?

[ltseung888]

The Joule Thief is a kind of Fly Back Trafo, like your PC power supply...
Generally you have not OU in this kind of thing...

This is clearly different of the Rotoverter/Transverter concept who they use LCR resonance with sine wave, resonate the windings motor or a side of a transformer and extract the power without reflecting to the source, by playing resonance, Power Factor, High impedance... etc.
I'am very sceptic about a simple JT could be OU, this is two different thing !!!
And the trap, this is not an obligation to have OU each time, with the resonance stuff, resonance do not garanty OU...

Is the Joule Thief an OU device?

From our experiments, we could not detect COP greater than one (peak-to-peak) results on the basic Joule Thief if we put a load on the LED side.

However, if we put a load (LED + 100 Ohm +10 Ohm) on the secondary transformer winding side, we sometimes get COP > 1 effects.

The cheapest configuration is the one-inch yellow toroid with 13 JT windings and 20 transformer windings approximately.  We need to tune it with variable resistors, change the holes in the breadboard, change the actual number of transformer windings and the length of the various wires etc. 

The result so far suggests that:

The Joule Thief Circuit in general is NOT an overunity circuit.  The enhanced Joule Thief with transformer winding on the secondary will sometimes exhibit COP > 1 (peak-to-peak) results if tuned properly.

[Omnibus]

Is the Joule Thief an OU device?

From our experiments, we could not detect COP greater than one (peak-to-peak) results on the basic Joule Thief if we put a load on the LED side.

However, if we put a load (LED + 100 Ohm +10 Ohm) on the secondary transformer winding side, we sometimes get COP > 1 effects.

The cheapest configuration is the one-inch yellow toroid with 13 JT windings and 20 transformer windings approximately.  We need to tune it with variable resistors, change the holes in the breadboard, change the actual number of transformer windings and the length of the various wires etc. 

The result so far suggests that:

The Joule Thief Circuit in general is NOT an overunity circuit.  The enhanced Joule Thief with transformer winding on the secondary will sometimes exhibit COP > 1 (peak-to-peak) results if tuned properly.

No, you can't claim OU in any of your experiments because you have done them incorrectly. Do them the way they should be done, as explained, and then we'll see if you have OU.