Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[quarktoo]

Deceleration also works and that is from actual experiments not some theoretical BS.  It takes three orthogonal forces to induce a current in a conductor.  If any of these coincide with the direction of current than large currents are produced quite easily, and this is is why a homopolar generator produces such a large current with such low voltage.  (Of course homopolar generators have that back-torque issue to contend with.)

Truce for 1 post -

If you take your Sigma16 and shoot a beer can, it drills a nice neat hole through the can and does not damage the can all that much. Now reload a shell with about 25% of the powder in it. Notice how it does massive damage to the can? Deceleration. Same thing I suspect on a smaller scale.

On a theoretical level maybe the reason is that a voltage field floats above the surface of the wire. As it slows down perhaps it is closer to the surface - that I am not sure about that but it is possible.

I always try and understand what is happening so that I can build from that. A book of classic EM rules is useless in OU research. It is the cracks in classic EM that will reveal the techniques of OU IMO.


O.K. Game on again. :-)

[sigma16]

According to your classic EM "theoretical BS" overunity isn't possible.

Funny how you can make statements like that at OUR and and don't have to back it up with something like others would be required to. It is that double standard that people complain about. Shakedown operation disguised as a free energy web site? :-) Da!

Correct.  OU is not possible per classical EM, nor do I beleive it is possible.  This is why I think looking for "additional energy" or "exotic sources of energy" is futile.

I never claimed "overunity", or OU.  I made a "statement" of what I think, based on what I did, and left it up to others to verify.

Ed Gray knew about accelerating mass and gives a nice demonstration of it.  See link here:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9848.msg271372#msg271372

The author mentions a precise indicator of acceleration in his description of events.

[quarktoo]

Correct.  OU is not possible per classical EM, nor do I beleive it is possible.  This is why I think looking for "additional energy" or "exotic sources of energy" is futile.

I never claimed "overunity", or OU.  I made a "statement" of what I think, based on what I did, and left it up to others to verify.

Ed Gray knew about accelerating mass and gives a nice demonstration of it.  See link here:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9848.msg271372#msg271372

The author mentions a precise indicator of acceleration in his description of events.

Ed gray in that post is quoted as saying what I did to POYNTless99:

Gray said, "I never had no schooling in electronics or physics, so nobody told me it was impossible."

So what you are doing is doublespeak. One one hand, you suggest you did something and on the other you don't think it is possible while leaving it up to others to decide while not exactly demonstrating it.

I know why your delay line is giving you the result it is and I have explained it here and there till I am blue in the face. To continue to explain it is POYNTless especially when you don't believe" it is possible. I don't really have beliefs or any other magical thoughts.

EDIT -

You know damn well why it works too. You split the positive line and that is your basic AB effect. Stick a magnet between where the split takes place and see if your output increases. Krones multi path is the same thing.

I've seen a photo of a nano AB effect generator and it is just like the original experiment only hardwired. Personally I think it is the safest and best way to get there but Hubbard and a few others have me curious as well.

Got my cores worked out and am thinking this thing could be experimented with a C core with a center leg that can slide around to figure out where the sweet spot is. Just happen to have one all set up.