Electrical igniter for gas engines A keystone to understanding by Magluvin

[wattsup]

You can cry or you can just do your works. It's a choice.............

But insulting the guy will not get you anywhere and in actual fact these personal niknaks are totally counter productive and may be construed as a willful attempt to subvert the issue.

So the best thing to do when you have nothing good to say is to simply refrain. Wow....... what a novel idea that is.

[Qwert]

I agree with wattsup. Just ignore such ones. Do not insult. And please: stop non-productive texts, pictures.

[Magluvin]

your right.  In fact I see this crap in other threads, even worse. But I have said to ignore tito before.
But I tell ya,  teets makes 1 more coment about my morality, call me a sinner, or say that I am holding back things and a liar, I would like to block the hypocrite. Because he has shown that he is all of these.
He can make his own thread. I wont touch it.

He asks me what I saw in this patent. Well, I spelled it out in the beginning of the thread. He says Im holding stuff back.
Actually, as I stated in a recent post, that what I thought this patent was all about, that I may have been mistaken. Just because this way of making a spark is more efficient than the common way, does not mean that there is more energy coming out than going in. It could just mean that we dont have to waste power this way as compared to the common way. It was my fault for assuming that the common way was possibly very efficient and that this way could sent it over the top.
But this is what I want to find out.  Does this sound like Im being dishonest? I am admitting my possible mistakes of assumptions that I have made, as I have done before.
But teets says that he tried to get people to notice this pat. way back, and he proved it by posting where he said it. Well cool. But so far I have tried many different configs with not so interesting results, as I have stated that a vid wasnt warranted, yet.
But I have come up with this getting a pulse motor to to be the load as a way to try and get a useful and possibly measurable way of testing this out. Well maybe Teets thinks Im holding out because I did find something, only because I have not shown anything yet. Hypocrite. When in reality, not just any old coil and not just any old cap AND not just any old switching will do here to get pleasing results. Im sure that many experienced builders can agree. This is not just any coil and reed switch running a magnet rotor. That stuff I can do 3 or 5 varieties of vids in an evening, as I have done.

So now I will be in ignore state, all business. Im sure that everyone will be happy now.  I guess.

Mags

[forest]

and not just any frequency 

[forest]

Little of topic but maybe not:
can someone explain me what is going on sometimes with an arrow thrown from  a bow ?
Normally having that arrow in hand I feel how stiff it is and waving it in air makes nothing special just a tiny disturbance.Sometimes however when somebody throw that arrow and correct angle to the correct badge made of correct material then end of stuck arrow fall in high frequency trembling producing a high-pitch like sound. The effect is so spectacular that you will find it in most of adventure movies especially in westerns.
Is that something related to Bloch wall manipulation , wattsup ? Can somebody explain me how it is done mechanically for arrow ? Please !!! 
Why am I asking that ? Because I have a strong feeling we can do the same with magnetic field ! Magnetic field being like that stiff arrow and we can throw it and stop it and make it self-oscillating like that arrow. Just help me find the reason, the answer .Our today methods is like waving arrow by hand.

Also look here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein-de_Haas_effect

Again it looks like we can drive electrons by inertia....hmmm