Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



GENERATOR- YOU DO THE IN/OUT POWER MATH

Started by magnetman12003, April 19, 2010, 09:16:15 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39
User actions

Bruce_TPU

#175
June 18, 2010, 07:09:09 AM
Quote from: FatChance!!! on June 18, 2010, 06:27:04 AM
If it takes no friction when trying to make a device self run, then it's certainly not overunity.
The only real overunity device is one that is able to self run while sustaining an external load, friction included.

FatChance, FatChance.  Your definition does NOT hold water, I am sorry to say.  FRICTION is not a prerequisite to OU.  More Wattage out, than Wattage in.  DC vs. DC, the output smoothed with a cap.  This is the true test.  Tom shows this but is careful not to go proclaiming it.  If a unit is self running, sustaining itself, it is ridiculous to say that it must have friction to prove anything.  Magnetic bearings is what Steorn Used for their E-Orbo.  So I guess no OU there? 

Please less typing and more building...  I am waiting to see your replication, pls.  Of anything.

Have a good day!

Bruce
1.  Lindsay's Stack TPU Posted Picture.  All Wound CCW  Collectors three turns and HORIZONTAL, not vertical.

2.  3 Tube amps, sending three frequency's, each having two signals, one in-phase & one inverted 180 deg, opposing signals in each collector (via control wires). 

3.  Collector is Magnetic Loop Antenna, made of lamp chord wire, wound flat.  Inside loop is antenna, outside loop is for output.  First collector is tuned via tuned tank, to the fundamental.  Second collector is tuned tank to the second harmonic (component).  Third collector is tuned tank to the third harmonic (component)  Frequency is determined by taking the circumference frequency, reducing the size by .88 inches.  Divide this frequency by 1000, and you have your second harmonic.  Divide this by 2 and you have your fundamental.  Multiply that by 3 and you have your third harmonic component.  Tune the collectors to each of these.  Input the fundamental and two modulation frequencies, made to create replicas of the fundamental, second harmonic and the third.

4.  The three frequency's circulating in the collectors, both in phase and inverted, begin to create hundreds of thousands of created frequency's, via intermodulation, that subtract to the fundamental and its harmonics.  This is called "Catalyst".

5.  The three AC PURE sine signals, travel through the amplification stage, Nonlinear, producing the second harmonic and third.  (distortion)

6.  These signals then travel the control coils, are rectified by a full wave bridge, and then sent into the output outer loop as all positive pulsed DC.  This then becomes the output and "collects" the current.

P.S.  The Kicks are harmonic distortion with passive intermodulation.  Can't see it without a spectrum analyzer, normally unless trained to see it on a scope.

DeepCut

#176
June 18, 2010, 07:54:51 AM
Ye FC !

What on earth were you smoking when you wrote that  ?


Gary.

DeepCut

#177
June 18, 2010, 08:05:34 AM
I'm wondering how this setup would compare to an SSG for battery-charging ?

I learnt a lot about batteries when i was doing my SSG on the monopole3 group but i never really understood how their COP calculations worked i just stuck my figures into their spreadsheet that they make available.

I have a 6V battery which is at 6.19V which means it is at sulphation point, there is a handy chart half way down this page :

http://www.batterystuff.com/tutorial_battery.html

If i charge the battery from this device i know the energy input taken but how do i calculate what's gone into the battery ?

My battery is 6V @ 4.5Ah so can do 27W for an hour (i think this is right).

So, if it gets charged from 6.19V to a fully-charged state of 6.3V does that mean the power that's gone in is 1.1*4.5 = 4.95W ?


Thanks,

Gary.

FatChance!!!

#178
June 18, 2010, 08:32:01 AM
Quote from: Bruce_TPU on June 18, 2010, 07:09:09 AM
If a unit is self running, sustaining itself, it is ridiculous to say that it must have friction to prove anything.
Friction itself is proof of nothing. But I told you the obvious. If a device cannot handle any small load, e.g friction,
then it can't possible sustain itself in closed due to all other losses involved in such a scenario.

Quote from: Bruce_TPU on June 18, 2010, 07:09:09 AM
Magnetic bearings is what Steorn Used for their E-Orbo.  So I guess no OU there? 
There's no proof of any overunity from the E-Orbo except the unverified claims of the Steorn crew.
Omnibus own replication does not qualify as proof yet due to the lack of unbiased verification.

Quote from: DeepCut on June 18, 2010, 07:54:51 AM
What on earth were you smoking when you wrote that  ?
None, perhaps I'm just a sane guy that can see through all the smoke and confusion when there is
claims of overunity. So far I have never been wrong. But I do hope I'm wrong this time.

DeepCut

#179
June 18, 2010, 09:56:47 AM
FC.

Tom didn't devise a friction-free magnet/shaft assembly because the device couldn't handle the friction.

He devised the assembly to maximise the RPM.

I hope that clarifies things.


Gary.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39
User actions