Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

[FatBird]

Besides myself, does anyone else see a CONNECTION between Rosemary's Pulsed Wire Wound resistor AND the PULSED COIL DEVICES in:

Plaustin, Don Smith, Floyd Sweet, Morey, Hubbard, SM's TPU, Magnacoaster, etc, etc, etc.


The answer is that they are all using Different Methods to Harness the Back EMF from a Pulsed Coil.  The trouble is that almost None of us can duplicate any of them.

.

[conradelektro]

I like to use the “eZ430 MSP430F2012 Target Board” from Texas Instruments
http://www.ti-estore.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Product_Code=EZ430-T2012&Screen=PROD

together with the „MSP430 USB Stick Development Tool”
http://www.ti-estore.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=EZ430-F2013

Some time ago I built exactly what is needed to drive the IRFPG50 and its “coil like load resistor” with a “12 Volt square wave signal”. I used this hook-up to drive four ignition coils (with four BUZ11 transistors).

This thing can push out four different 12 Volt pulse trains (interrupt driven pulse width modulation) with every frequency and duty cycle from 1 to 1 MHz. One only has to add the three 12 Volt batteries, an IRFPG50 (instead of the BUZ11), the shunt (for measurements) and the ominous “Load Resister wound like an air coil” in order to test the Ainslie theory.

I show this to underline the fact, that creating a square wave signal according to any specification is a straight forward task, which should not be the issue.

There are many good solutions and I think that a state of the art signal generator like the Fluke Fluke 6080A  http://www.teknetelectronics.com/Search.asp?p_ID=5946&pDo=DETAIL would bet he best choice.

I post all this in order to resolve the NE555 issue. As long as we are messing with the NE555, there will be no way forward, just endless fumbling with potentiometers.

Assume that any pulse train with any duty cycle can be created easily (as long as you stay below 100 MHz).

Now concentrate on what frequency and what duty cycles you want and according to which criteria you want to “adjust” the frequency and the duty cycle. Once this is specified in a logical and objective way, you can have it.

@FatBird

Yes, we are talking about the idea (or dream) that back EMF gives you back more than you invested in its EMF.

Greetings, Conrad

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary:

Good to see this work continuing over here.  I wish you the best.

Bill

Another post that I missed.  Thank you Bill.  Much appreciated.   

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys.  This thread will be devoted to the development of our first application designed around exploiting the principles of our COP>17 circuit variously also known as a Mosfet Heating Circuit.  Full details of the circuit will be posted together with the proposed tests all of which will be conducted on a local university campus.  We've finally got this to an academic forum and will have the real benefit of some critical academic evaluations.  There are a great number of posts to be transferred and this will take me some time.  But watch this space.  Harti has kindly allowed his forum for the systematic disclosure of all information related to this in the interests of keeping this fully available to Open
Source.  I will be dealing with all aspects related to this both on early tests, test replications and future tests.

Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/aetherevarising

Hi Guys.  I've posted this as a reminder of the objects of this thread.  My time is getting constrained and the problem is likely to increase as I'll be spending more and more time on campus.  If I miss any significant posts then just pm me and I'll get back there.  It's a really good thing that you are going to do replications.  And I'll rally where and as I can.  Correctly I think we should have another thread for replications.  But that's something you guys must decide on.  I'll fall in. 

I'll answer your questions as best I can from a quick read.  Conrad - you referenced patents.  Here's the thing.  The circuit is one example of many potential circuits.  The UNREGISTERED patent could never cover all those potentials.  But it was intended as a broad sweep of the object being to use Back EMF or Counter EMF to replenish a supply source.  I think it was FatBird mentioned that all such 'claims' seem to be related to pulsed coils.  Indeed you're right.  It actually goes to the throat of the argument.  I need you to understand this fully.

Mainstream have no clear explanation for current flow.  There are those who attribute this to an electron flow - and our physicists who claim it cannot be electrons as they cannot 'share a path' - per Pauli's exclusion principle.  The argument rages but most engineers use the model of electrons and it's pretty well standard.  And - more to the point - quantum electrodynamics is the single most tried and tested and successful branch of quantum engineering.  So whatever model is used - clearly it's worked as it's outperformed all the rest.  So the weight of argument falls to the engineers who use the concept - widely. 

But.  If current flow is the 'flow of electrons' that pass from the supply through the circuit - then there is also the inevitable argument that the circuit could NEVER exceed unity - as all energy is transferred via those electrons that move from the supply through the circuit components and back to the source.  Any energy stored on the circuit in inductive components is a measure of this passage of electron flow.  Maximum efficiency is therefore 1 or something less than equivalence. 

However, in terms of this thesis - if current flow is the result of something else, perhaps we can here simply call it 'charge' - some material property that is extraneous to the atoms in the supply source - then 'charge' may also be a potential material property in circuit components in the same way as they may have a material property in the supply.  Then.  If this charge can be induced to have a measurable potential difference - that 'charge' belonging to the material of the circuit components - is another potential energy source. 

Effectively that's the claim.  The energy that is returned to the supply source to 'replenish' or 'recharge' it - comes from the material of - in this particular circuit -  the resistor itself.  The minute you introduce an alternative 'supply' then one would expect the energy available to that circuit to be equal to the mass of the material in the the supply AND the mass of the material that is in the path of the supply.  It does not breach the laws of energy conservation.  On the contrary.  To expect 'equivalence' is somewhat in conflict with Einstein's E=MC^2

Please read my comments regarding the required 'waveform'.  It will point you to the self-oscillation that is a feature of this 'effect'. 

But all that is needed - effectively - is to generate that counter electromotive force and route the energy back through the battery.  This can be done with the use of diodes - it can be returned to the same or an alternative supply - it can be used with inductive resistive loads or with pure inductors in series or parallel to resistive loads.  There are many ways to skin this cat.  The only requirement is to use a switched current and to return the energy back to the supply.  It's really that simple.

Regards,
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/aetherevarising

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Conrad.  Regarding your question related to the 555.  Theoretically there is absolutely NO requirement for any particular switch.  The only proviso is that the tuning enables that self-oscillating frequency.  I'm an amateur - and I have never owned a functions generator - so I can only - personally - answer to this over unity result from a standard type switching circuit.  But I know that this effect has been tested by others using various other means.

Your comments regarding the need to establish the required parameters to enable this frequency are valid.  It is scheduled for testing on these new tests that we'll be conducting on campus.  I've been running a race here Conrad.  I need to ask for your patience.  We do NOT have all the answers.  At this stage all we have is a thesis that predicted the results, the experimental evidence of those results, the wide accreditation by registered laboratories on those results - and latterly the replication of those results from reliable measuring instruments.  But the technology is still in its infancy.  I need to impose on your patience here.   

Kind regards,
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/aetherevarising