Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

[Rosemary Ainslie]

This component parts list was shared by fuzzytomcat.

Jesus

Thanks for this Jesus.  The component parts list here is marginally different to that posted on the previous schematic as it applies to the publication in Quantum magazine.  But it's fine.  For replicators - don't get too involved with the precise component parts related to the switch.  We've built and used 3 different switches over the years and they all work.  The critical aspects to this are simply that you tend to 'thick' inductive wire.  I have noticed over this year that I've now been on these forums - that there is an almost obsessive need to do a precise duplication.  Guys - we're not talking marginal values of COP's.  There's plenty of room to introduce variations in the component parts, especially as these relate to the switch.  And they ALL result in efficiencies.  It's just some are greater than others.  The secret is simply to ensure that you use 'thick' wire or wire with 'more mass' - and that you keep the 'hollow' in the resistor as ample as you can find and afford.  It allows for a pure return in the collapsing fields from Counter EMF. 

I would recommend that - for those who are interested that you read up on the thesis.  Once you've got your head around the thinking I'm satisfied you'll all come up with better ways to achieve this test object.  What flies in the face of mainstream thinking is that the amount of energy returned to the battery is roughly equal to the energy first delivered.  That much has been empirically evident throughout.

Regards,
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/aetherevarising
Edited the quote

[conradelektro]

I would like to clear up the NE555-issue. This is not criticism; it is an attempt to establish facts.

Rosemary filed several patents (see below), and in these patents one finds a “signal generator”, a “pulse generator” and in general “means being appliable to interrupt the electric current”, but the NE555 is not mentioned.

WO03007657 http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20030123&CC=WO&NR=03007657A2&KC=A2
The switching pulses come from a “signal generator”, the NE555 is not mentioned.

WO9938247
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19990729&CC=WO&NR=9938247A1&KC=A1
The switching pulses come from a “pulse generator”, the NE555 is not mentioned.

EP0932248
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=19990728&CC=EP&NR=0932248A1&KC=A1
The switching pulses come from “means being appliable to interrupt the electric current” or from a “pulse generator”, the NE555 is not mentioned.

ZA990385
http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?CC=ZA&NR=9900385A&KC=A&FT=D&date=19990720&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP
ZA990385 is essentially EP932248.


In contrast to the patents the discussion in the energeticforum (see
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5250-cop-17-heater-rosemary-ainslie-part-2-a-21.html  COP 17 Heater | Rosemary Ainslie | Part 2) was completely focused on the NE555 circuit. And this very thread turns again into a discussion of a NE555 circuit.


According to my humble opinion, the concentration on the NE555 circuit is unfortunate because it complicates matters enormously. On does not want to investigate the NE555. The whole theory should not depend on the NE555.

The issue is an effect over a resistor, which is wound like an air coil (in order to create back EMF).

To resolve the NE555 issue I want to ask Rosemary a simple question:

Did you personally (or any other researcher) ever observe the effect in a circuit where the NE555 was not used?

In case you (or some one else) did, please specify the circuit or describe it in some other way.

Remarks:

I understand that the NE555 circuit allows in an apparently easy way changing frequency and duty cycle by fiddling with two potentiometers. But one can never reproduce a successful setting because it depends on too many parameters (temperature of all components involved, material peculiarities of the potentiometers and capacitors).

To make progress one needs a circuit that allows exact replication of successful frequencies and duty cycles. Adjustments should happen in a narrow range (e.g. 0.1%).

The patents suggest rather low frequencies (60 to 200.000 Hz), which would make it very easy to drive the “switching element” (e.g. the IRFPG50) with a microprocessor where a program changes frequency and duty cycle in a systematic way.

May be some feedback from the "load resistor" or some sensor on the "load resistor" should change frequency and duty cycle according to an algorithm.

I understand the difficulty with finding the "right frequency and duty cycle", but this has to be brought from the subjective to the objective. Otherwise there will be no recognition of the effect.

Greetings, Conrad

[ramset]

Conrad,
This observation of yours, I'm quite sure is not unique!

As efficient as Glen and others around him are THEY MUST HAVE DONE THIS!

NO??

A micro processor? We have a member here "groundloop", he builds these in his sleep!
most of us can't!

I'ts been over a year since I asked/begged TK to go over to Energetic and look at this,
Nobody has gone solid state processor yet?

You know they "MUST" have!!

Chet

[nievesoliveras]

There is another alternative.

We can buy an already made oscillator as the switch.
A motor driver used for hho production.

I think that it is called  a pwm.

The question is will it work?

Jesus

[nievesoliveras]

Duplicated post.