Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Thanks Fritz.  That's a really comprehensive reply.  You're last para ?  That's depressing.  But I'm not sure that things aren't changing.  I'm already onto some electric car manufacturers and they just want to 'lighten' the battery load.  So there's some interest. But I get it that the 'art' of this is going to be related to the optimised 'rate of recharge'.  But that's a learning curve.  I still see zero emissions if this works - possibly again in conjunction with some solar cells to supply a trickle charge as required. 

And if we can get our hot water cylinder to cook by applying energy this way - then... the sky's the limit - or rather - it's NOT the limit.  LOL. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

[fritz]

Hi Rosemary,

Traditional batteries are like smiling buddha;-)))
They perform perfect if they are full of charge and without load. 

This is why they don´t perform in electrical vehicle.
In my opinion - a well defined "compound" battery which fits the needs of an electrical verhicle has not been invented so far.
Its just adding up lots of general purpose cells. By having an electrolyte reservoir - it would be easy to have the proper trade off in terms of conversion capability and storage density. But this would not work with dry cells prefered for laptops and mobile use....
A tesla roadster is a nice bomb if it comes to the amount of spontaneus convertible energy available. Even the roadster would operate with only a fraction of that available conversion performance.
But there is a change and it will happen ;-)))


rgds.

Fritz

[nul-points]

hi Rosemary

thanks for the feedback

have i understood correctly your thesis to predict that the heat generated by your 'RA Heater Circuit' will be anomalous compared to the 'conventional'  (I^2 x R x time) value as measured across the load, using standard equipment (eg. scopes, voltmeters, current probes, etc)?

if so, then presumably any testing for COP>1 needs to be done using calorimetry?

your own original accredited results showing  COP >> 1  appear to have been successfully done this way

the flip side of this requirement would be that conventional measurements are only going to show conventional energy conversion and gradual depletion of source battery

so in any future testing, there is little point in measuring volts and amps on the output side - although obviously it is still necessary (and fairly straightforward) to obtain the energy supplied from volts & amps input

we can then compare total (V*I*t Joules In) with total (Heat Joules Out)


(ASIDE - all this makes me wonder: why did the previous replicators use such 'heavy-duty' scopes and collect so much electrical data, if the excess output energy is thermal rather than conventional volts & amps?)


i hope these ramblings makes sense!

thanks
sandy

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hello Sandy.  I saw your readcasts on Scribd.  Many thanks 

The measure of energy dissipated at the load is impossibly complex.  We're inducing a large CEMF on an inductive/resistive load.  Energy measured here is traditionally computed as v^2/r - except on these switching circuits.  But v is changing and changing at a really fast rate.  I know Harvey attempted an analysis based on the resonance - but it was laughably inadequate and in any event intended to prove a zero gain.  I'm sure there are ways of doing this.  But - in as much as we're dissipating heat - then analysis according to temperature is empirical.  No one will argue the results. 

We needed that 'heavy duty' scope TDS3054C (my thanks to Tektronix) because we need to 'find' the required waveform across the resistor.  It holds the characteristic signature harmonic which is referred to as a 'shadow cycle' or 'preferred oscillation mode'.  Once this is evident we can confidently say that the system is in a kind of 'self resonating' frequency that invariably gives those gains.

Also, the assessment of current flow across the shunt needs to be acurately gauged.  Unlike the resistor, the shunt is non-inductive and therefore any measurements here are also correctly evaluated based on the ohmic values of the shunt.  The better the machine the less arguable the results.  So.  In short it's needed for the evaluation of the waveform across the load to determine the required resonance - and then for the voltage measurements acorss the shunt to evaluate the energy delivered by the battery.  Hope that makes it clearer.

But you're right that thesis predicts the level of 'heat' that is evident on the load.  The thinking is that when those 'binding' magnetic fields are broken - when they can no longer orbit - then they unravel.  They cascade out of the fast orbit and slow down to become apparent in our own measurable dimensions.  We see this as fire or we measure it as heat.  Effectively those little one dimensional fields lose velocity and gain mass (and temperature rise) in an inverse proportional relationship.  Effectively in the field orbit they're cold.  Outside of that orbit they're hot.  Which effectively means that the magnetic fields themselves hold a calorific value.  And that also means that 'fire' 'heat' 'light' are all a form of 'plasma'.  Not popular thinking as it is widely dismissed by mainstream.  My justification for this proposal is two fold.  In the first we know that fire does nothing to change the properties of the atoms that are associated with a fire (nuclear fire excepted).  It simply unbinds previously bound amalgams.  In the second - this would account for the total conservation of energy - which the thesis requires.  It has the added merit of explaining how fire can 'spread' accessing as it would - those binding fields in adjacent flammable materials.  In essense I'm proposing that fire is a 'plasma' - not just that 'chemical reaction which is well understood by mainstream'.  That's how this is usually dismissed.  LOL.

Hope that clarifies things.
Kindest as ever,
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33988924/DARK-MATTER-MFM

edited.  'except on these switching circuits'

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi Rosemary,

Traditional batteries are like smiling buddha;-)))
They perform perfect if they are full of charge and without load. 

A tesla roadster is a nice bomb if it comes to the amount of spontaneus convertible energy available. Even the roadster would operate with only a fraction of that available conversion performance.
But there is a change and it will happen ;-)))
rgds.

Fritz