Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

[WilbyInebriated]

He is known for his amusement books and not for his string theory papers. There are others with string theory papers who aren't nearly as popular as that unfortunate person. Speaking of string theory, all that can be ignored out of hand because it is an outgrowth of another misconception, based on obvious internal contradictions. This isn't the place to discuss it, though.

what this isn't the place for... this isn't the place for you to denigrate a far brighter mind and personality (kaku) than yours in a vain and flawed attempt to discredit...

maybe you know him for his "amusement books"... but that's just you isn't it? to suggest he is not a person of renown is asinine omnibus.

[Omnibus]

hi rosemary. and who could forget he (kaku) is listed in who's who in science and engineering, AND american men and women of science... but they don't list people of renown now do they?

No, they don't always. Many times you can find names of modest achievements listed there because those who's who's are mostly business and they'll gladly list you if you pay them, never mind you're in the City University of NY. Even more prestigious may sound to be the member of the NY Academy of Science but it actually isn't for the same reason.

[Omnibus]

what this isn't the place for... this isn't the place for you to denigrate a far brighter mind and personality (kaku) than yours in a vain and flawed attempt to discredit...

This isn't the place to discuss string theories and where they arrive from. Michio Kaku denigrates himself, without external help, by writing complete nonsense.

[WilbyInebriated]

No, they don't always. Many times you can find names of modest achievements listed there because those who's who's are mostly business and they'll gladly list you if you pay them, never mind you're in the City University of NY. Even more prestigious may sound to be the member of the NY Academy of Science but it actually isn't for the same reason.

do those publications EVER list people of renown omni? a simple yes or no answer will suffice...
then,
do those publications NEVER list people of renown omni? a simple yes or no answer will suffice...

[Omnibus]

Rosemary, again, this is not true:

And, that they called it 'electricity' at all is based on their early understanding that it was due to electron flow.  That early concept is flawed.

because directed electron flow comprising electricity can be demonstrated at once. Now, because you want an example with a generator, take a Faraday generator. You can easily convince yourself that what flows in the wires are electrons in concert by feeding an electrolysis cell where Cu can be deposited. You can measure the weight of the cathode prior to the experiment and after you have fed the cell with the generator. The net increase of Cu weight can only be due to directed flow of electrons which is what electrical current is.