Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

[sm0ky2]

@ GLEN


For some reason my PM's dont work on this site anymore, so i cannot reply to you that way, and i was unable to locate the thread you found me on, but since i KNOW you're reading this one, i'll respond to you here......

I really dont care about your "legal" battles, i have no intention of assisting you when it concerns a device freely discussed on an OPEN SOURCE FORUM.
I have absolutely no sympathy for you and your partners in this situation.
Yes, from all outside appearance, it seems to be great work you have done to advance this technology. And perhaps, in some esoteric fashion, you should be given "credit" for lending a helping hand. But i dont think that makes this tech. "yours".

And in either case, there should be no claims to proprietorship on anything that is posed here by its respective inventor.
The act of posting such information on this OPEN SOURCE FORUM comes with the explicit and implicit knowledge that the technology is to be deemed OPEN SOURCE. Period.

I will have nothing to do with what you are trying to accomplish.
  If it is my advice you seek, i would suggest that you post the information you have HERE, in its appropriate location.
and continue your efforts to further this technology.
What you ultimately decide to do is entirely up to you.

But i dont appreciate you attempting to persuade myself or other members of this forum to conspire against one another.
We are here to unify and share our knowledge. not keep secrets and divide us apart.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

@ GLEN


For some reason my PM's dont work on this site anymore, so i cannot reply to you that way, and i was unable to locate the thread you found me on, but since i KNOW you're reading this one, i'll respond to you here......

I really dont care about your "legal" battles, i have no intention of assisting you when it concerns a device freely discussed on an OPEN SOURCE FORUM.
I have absolutely no sympathy for you and your partners in this situation.
Yes, from all outside appearance, it seems to be great work you have done to advance this technology. And perhaps, in some esoteric fashion, you should be given "credit" for lending a helping hand. But i dont think that makes this tech. "yours".

And in either case, there should be no claims to proprietorship on anything that is posed here by its respective inventor.
The act of posting such information on this OPEN SOURCE FORUM comes with the explicit and implicit knowledge that the technology is to be deemed OPEN SOURCE. Period.

I will have nothing to do with what you are trying to accomplish.
  If it is my advice you seek, i would suggest that you post the information you have HERE, in its appropriate location.
and continue your efforts to further this technology.
What you ultimately decide to do is entirely up to you.

But i dont appreciate you attempting to persuade myself or other members of this forum to conspire against one another.
We are here to unify and share our knowledge. not keep secrets and divide us apart.

  Sm0ky.  Truly a STAR.  I'm always ridiculously emotional - but this post has actually left me feeling choked.  I keep hoping for this kind of response and HERE IT IS.  Open source is PRECISELY that - it's open and open to INSPECTION.  There is nothing that can ever be achieved by nefarious, cloak and dagger murmurings and whisperings.  Truth needs to stand up to the light of day.  And it's not promoted in shameful little dark corners.

I have no idea what it is that Glen has advised you all.  Nor do I want to know.  It'll involve me in more counterclaims and such is tedious - in the extreme.  But I know enough about the caliber of the members here to also know that they ALL want progress in clean green.  And KEEP IT OPEN.  Otherwise it stinks of conspiracy. 

Thank God for OU.com and Stefan.  I'm entirely satisfied that without this thread this technology would, today, be forgotten on the internet.  Then sadly - it's progress will never be seen here on these forums.  And the truth is that it's these forums that are the real catalyst to some profoundly changing paradigms.  And the attendant benefits need to be jealously guarded.  We're not there yet.  But it's around the corner.

And just as an update.  We've FINALLY located the appropriate IGBT and the appropriate MOSFETS.  Two switches intended for design.  The IGBT due for delivery early next week.  Hopefully that will put paid to any further delays. 

THANK YOU AGAIN SMOKY.  Thank you for being a true blue open source member.  And thank you for being brave enough to post as you have.  I'm well aware of the courage required.

 

Kindest regards,
Rosie

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

Glen has done nothing wrong and his data has been available  for the public on the uni site ever since day 1. What a thread this is. I have been a neutral observer in the situation, the beef between people was escalated and not provoked by Glen. Those who dont focus on the technology will be kicked on the Ef.com, simple as that. Unless you were there and saw it all there is no way for you to judge.

If Stefan does not do it here, then good luck reading useless posts. Harvey, Aaron and Glen have done more to get the technology this  far  then any one. So far i dont see any practicality of not working independent with an open source circuit with this scenario. Glen is merely trying to warn what happened to him that's all. It back to the technology for us, no more needed to be said.

Ash

[Pirate88179]

Glen has done nothing wrong and his data has been available  for the public on the uni site ever since day 1. What a thread this is. I have been a neutral observer in the situation, the beef between people was escalated and not provoked by Glen. Those who dont focus on the technology will be kicked on the Ef.com, simple as that. Unless you were there and saw it all there is no way for you to judge.

If Stefan does not do it here, then good luck reading useless posts. Harvey, Aaron and Glen have done more to get the technology this  far  then any one. So far i dont see any practicality of not working independent with an open source circuit with this scenario. Glen is merely trying to warn what happened to him that's all. It back to the technology for us, no more needed to be said.

Ash

Then why all of the pm's to everyone?

Bill

[ashtweth_nihilisti]

Then why all of the pm's to everyone?

Bill

Hi Bill there was a reason why the energetic forum had to make a Mosfet heating circuit, there is a reason why Rose got banned. Catch my drift? There is a reason why Glen is warning people that's all it is. Dont hold it against him he was provoked. So was Aaron.

If the direction is focused on what went down THERE and not the technology (as are these posts)  it takes Glen's focus and hard work away (who by the way with out that you would not be reading about this technology, same as Harvey and Aaron's work) and it changes the direction the biggest interference of all.

Whit  this interference, i have watched glen and Harvey be  distracted, and with out this the technology would be further ahead , so this is why i am taking the time to tell you my friends to say the Energetic forum , Glen , Aaron and Harvey have done nothing wrong, i am afraid, i will testify to this as i was there in all of it.

Any one focusing on attacking Glen, Aaron or Harvey and not addressing the  technology is pure interference, its as simple as that, and ill be watching. Forget the feuds and focus on the technology guys, do not accuse Glen or the energetic forum, they have the only progress with this technology and it all open to the public. No other posts on the subject  are needed, i will say no more on the matter and hope you guys get on with the job.

Ashtweth