Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder

[truthbeknown]

Your comments needed repeating. And it was 1998 when the first patent submission was made.
Any whoooo, readers have been waiting for the new testing results from the Trade School but she says she will not post them because she thinks Glen and Harvey will steal them. Does she understand what OPEN SOURCE is? And really, once she came to OU.com after being banned from EF.com you would think she would just make a fresh start of it all. But no, she states her intentions in the first comment of this thread and then in reply#3 she starts in on her bad mouthing again that continued on from there.
So when will NEW results come out? Don't know. She could not answer GADH questions on the circuit when he started building one back in EF.com forum before she was banned. So he went into the Mosfet Heater Thread to get his questions answered there by the guys. He is still working on it and so far no positive results but he at least posts what results he is getting.
I believe 2 people expressed interest in the very beginning of this thread in building the circuit and I don't know why they didn't carry on through? Maybe no help from Rosemary? Her interest is only in her thesis? Maybe if they are still reading here they can tell us why?


J.

Dr. Darcy Babyola

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Dr. Darcy Babyola

R

[truthbeknown]

R

DOOZY2?

[Rosemary Ainslie]

DOOZY2?

Dr Dark Lee Menacineg?  Do we meet again?

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys,  apologies for quoting myself.  It's something that Truthbeknown and Glen rely on for self promotion.  But this is not a self promotion exercise.  It's for purposes of due record. 

It seems that I have been guilty of name calling.  Since this is the only post that I know of where I may have indulged the occassional epithet - then let me copy it lest the post is deleted and the essential message with it. 

I believe any of the criticisms in my other posts are allowable as those more damning attributes that I may have accidentally stumbled upon, are really only pointed at someone that I used to brush shoulders with some time back in the past.  More in the nature of rambling and digressing.  It's not obligatory, I hope - to always stick to the topic.  LOL

Regards,
Rosemary

What the hell are you doing if not trying to divorce me from my own work and to what end?  There is ONLY ONE CONCLUSION.  And we've all reached that conclusion.  Otherwise I must conclude that you waste hours of my time and your own in your desparate attempt to malign me for the fun of it.  As a rule people do not indulge in such CRAZY activities at such an enormous expense of their time and trouble.  What are you thinking?  What other possible conclusion is there to reach?  You have given us ALL the evidence required that you will do just about ANYTHING to destroy this work.

You KNOW that there is absolutely NO REGISTERED PATENT EXTANT ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD.  You KNOW that this was applied for for purposes of using the public disclosure of the patenting office to put the technology into the public domain.  I KNEW NOTHING OF THESE  FORUMS OR OF THE INTERNET.  I HAD NO OTHER MEANS OF GETTTING THIS KNOWLEDGE INTO THE PUBLIC DOMAIN TO RENDER IT UNPATENTABLE.  But what is particularly hard on the stomache is that you DARE to assume that the readers here think - FOR EVEN ONE MOMENT - that this technology is patented.  And you pretend and pretend and pretend.  You insinuate.  You imply.  You post links.   You ENTIRELY underestimate the intelligence of either the members or the readers of this forum.   It is insulting to see such transparent motives rendered with the subtleties of a sledgehammer and you assume that all an sundry cannot see what it is you are doing.  It is that embarrassing that it makes the toes curl.  What you need to do as a matter of extreme urgency is show a REGISTERED PATENT in my name or any member of my family's name.  Then I promise you my attention will be RIVETED.

No-one reading here needs to be reminded of the definition of intellectual property ownership with the possible exception of yourself.  One day I trust you and Harvey will explain the niceties that you discovered in your own replication that elevated it to something that was not a replication.  Something to do with the fact that you never quite reached COP>17.  LOL.  And then the added insult of seeing those jokes of data test 14 through God knows what - where you conveniently discovered a mistake.  WHY?  WHAT WAS THE DIFFERENCE?  WHAT IS THE MOTIVE?  I know perfectly well that the intention is to cast doubts on the result and then - no doubt - you will pull out a brand new discovery from under those two horns that protrude from your head.

I cannot tell you how an inventor can manage so much with such little knowledge and so little intelligence - but I suspect it's because the circuit's that EASY that my granddaughter could manage it.  What's not so easy is the methods of driving that switch.  Fortunately - there are MANY SWITCHING CIRCUITS on the internet - free and for the taking - that one does not need more than the ability to read.  And it is my mission to prove that an ABSOLUTE IGNORAMUS - SUCH AS MYSELF - can manage this.  That way, those others who are NOT trained in electronics - can get the confidence to put this together themselves.  I am very PROUD of my inabilities.  I share it with many.  And unlike you and Harvey et al - I am most ANXIOUS to assure all that you do not need to be Einstein to understand electricity.  IT'S ALL VERY SIMPLE AND VERY STRAIGHT FORWARD.  It's been obfuscated to the point of absurdity.  I hope to get rid of all that obfuscation.  And BTW.  While I am the first to admit to not being an expert - I have more than an adequate working knowledge - certainly for the purposes of my thesis.  And frankly I probably know as much about circuitry as you do.  Which may or may not being saying very much.  I am happy to admit to ignorance - I flinch at claiming more knowledge than I have.  I wish you'd follow this example.  It would save us all from embarrassment.

This is another one of your confusing absolutely meaningless statements - more or less as muddled as those strange links that you never tire of posting and that no-one bothers to open.  THERE IS NO REGISTERED PATENT.  WHY MUST I CLARIFY ANYTHING AT ALL?  GO AND SPEAK TO YOUR ATTORNEY.  HE COULD POSSIBLY HELP YOU.

Rosemary

added