vetting god

[11:11]

farrah day is a female british person,
with a mean-streak as wide as the atlantic ocean.

even by the historical standards of the average british person,
her viciousness is in the excess.



farrah day is known for committing the most heinous psychological attacks imaginable,
on this forum.

she has found a way to soak her words in cyanide,
before posting them.



she/it projects her personal opinion onto others,
as if she/it is the only valid mind that exists.

yet utterly fails to listen to others.
beyond the amount of listening that it takes,
to invent a new way,
to scrag other peoples minds.



i don't know how often her typing-claws have been slashing over the last few months,
or if she hasn't finally been banned by a mod.

i've almost given up on contributing to this forum in the past,
because a presence as downright awful as hers,
appeared to be tolerated here.

[icanbeatbob]

11:11, you need 911.

[11:11]

11:11, you need 911.

care to elaborate on your opinion ?
or are we to assume that you have no constructive opinion to share ?

[icanbeatbob]

@11:11

Wow, how can one elaborate on the divine truth of which you speak?

Let me see now. You come here making metaphorical statements and a few logical ones that I happen to agree with. Scary thought.

But to come here and talk about farray day and her poison is so damned funny. What is your objective or agenda? Is it to share your supreme understanding?

You don't believe in proof. You don't seem to need it. But I must ask, are you saying these things to improve ones understand of what you feel truth is? If so, maybe you should lower yourself to others conscious processes, like mine, by speaking in a way that most of us do, without others having to try to figure out what the hell you are saying.

If you want followers, no doubt you can find them. They don't need proof either, just a willingness to believe in your wisdom.

Here is the fun part for you. Now you get to respond, no doubt with selfless intent, in order to show others the way of my misguidance.

Your turn. Enlighten me oh great one.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hi everyone.  An interesting subject.  If I had to try and prove that God existed I'd probably point to the fact that there appears to be an existence of matter and the possibility is therefore that there was some 'cause' to generate that matter.  And then - perhaps that 'cause' is God?  But it's all pretty bewildering.  Frankly I think it takes enormous courage not to believe in God.  And probably a fair helping of courage to believe in a personal God. All that supervision.  The attack on the unco-operative conscience.  Not a happy thought. Brave reach here guys.  I'm of the opinion that this 'gift' of life, if such it is, and if it is not a happy accident - is actually something that I'd rather do without.  It's way too 'gravity bound'.  And way too much tedium in those daily imperatives.  I'd rather propose that there was a radical design flaw if we've really been created.  Hopefully evolution will eventually put things right and make things more bearable.  Meanwhile - if there is a personal God out there?  Then I confess - I've lost the plot.  Pretty lights in the night sky and some wonderful views of this our earth.  But dear me.  I've seen enough of both.  And human nature?  That's a misnomer.  There seems to be very little that's natural in humans.  We've become as overspecialised as the dinosaurs.