Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

[scotty1]

Hi all.
@Redorbs, you quoted Tesla earlier saying " On further investigation I found that this gas was so light that a volume equal to that of the earth would weigh only about one-twentieth of a pound...."
In another article Tesla writes... " The ether, although the most tenuous of all substances, is no exception to this rule.  Its density has been first estimated by Lord Kelvin and conformably to his finding a column of one square centimeter cross section and of a length such that light, traveling at a rate of three hundred thousands kilometers per second, would require one year to traverse it, should weigh 4.8 grams..."

Now since we have a 1cm x 1cm cross section, we can use a 1cm length of the above column to make 1cm cubed......
Calculate the number of cm's cubed in the one light year long column, which he said would weigh 4.8 grams, then calculate the volume of the Earth in cm's cubed.....compare the first quote which says the gas filling the Earth would weigh 1/20th of a pound with the column one light year long and see what happens!!!
You will find that there is a BIG difference, so both of Tesla's comments regarding the weight of the universal gas cannot be correct!!!
Comparing the 2 Tesla quotes, we should find that the light year long column would fit into the volume of the Earth 93.333333 times.....should, but don't.  Maybe one of them is correct but they cannot both be right....very BIG difference.

[scotty1]

The main reason Ed talks about the PMH is because according to him, he was able to demonstrate that when charged the keeper could displace a magnetized needls the same way a current carrying wire can according to the right hand rule. That is, that a persistant electric current circulates in the PMH bar and can be detected using a magnetized needle.
Similar to this experiment on a micro scale...
http://phys.org/news174222765.html

Notice that the physicists could not measure the current on a macro scale but Ed said he could.
I have tried but my tests were inconclusive.....maybe a true wrought iron is needed for the PMH metal instead of mild steel. True wrought iron throws out alot more of the individual magnets than mild steel does.
Scotty.

[scotty1]

A bit of humour......From the article about the elusive persistent current....quote "The team used nanoscale cantilevers, an entirely novel approach, to indirectly measure the current through changes in the magnetic force it produces as it flows through the ring."

Ed says " The trouble with the physicists is they use indirect and ultra-indirect methods to come to their conclusions."        
Maybe one day they will find a direct method like Ed did??
Scotty.

[derekwillstar]

The main reason Ed talks about the PMH is because according to him, he was able to demonstrate that when charged the keeper could displace a magnetized needls the same way a current carrying wire can according to the right hand rule. That is, that a persistant electric current circulates in the PMH bar and can be detected using a magnetized needle.
Similar to this experiment on a micro scale...
http://phys.org/news174222765.html

Notice that the physicists could not measure the current on a macro scale but Ed said he could.
I have tried but my tests were inconclusive.....maybe a true wrought iron is needed for the PMH metal instead of mild steel. True wrought iron throws out alot more of the individual magnets than mild steel does.
Scotty.

if we look a PMH and compare it to a corresponding permanent magnet (shaped like a U) I think it is clear that keeps monopolies in a coil positive (N) while the other keeps monopolies negative (S).
Breaking the PMH (side coil) there is a flash of light that is high-speed magnetic energy (the same light from the sun)
The magnetic energy is movement (of the magnetic particles from S to N) then a permanent magnet can be understood as a direction "->" an arrow.
But the permanent magnets are in balance and nothing can disturb this ...
Leedskalnin extracted monopolies using its flywheel, by positioning the arrows in place of the magnets of the flywheel, the configuration then compared with that of a circular HALBACK ARRAY ...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qv-9IAj_YnI

[7redorbs]

Whilst I work out how to reply to Scotts question without embarassing myself, here is an explanation of the delusive thompson faraday electron theory, and a conjecture identical to leedskalnins from the foremost expert in the Tesla Technology that the corporate machine seems so desperate to stop folks such as us understanding.

Read of it what you will. I consider it very very valuable information indeed. Eric Dollard can help deal with this, Vertical and Horizontal Magnetic Currents and Quadrature in the technical perspective of the transverse and longitudinal waves I spoke about earlier.

Interestingly 93.3 re-occuring is about 84/90 as a fractional representation. Not reading into it or anything, just saying, start with looking at the ratio's between 186,000mi/sec and 291,000mi/sec to get an idea where the delusions of Thompson cathode ray thinking starts, to be fair, Dollard leaves very little to the imagination of the willing candidate to pursue such study.

For the rest of us though it's just another day at the office, but I know what I would rather be doing, pushing bits of metal together to get voltage back, look towards Sankofa.

Einstein and his theories can be expressed by an animal story: As understood thru his writing Relativity as a “package of ideas” is in many ways similar to the “egg of the coo-coo bird”. The coo-coo bird builds no nest of its own, it looks for the right next among those other birds. Here found it lays its egg in the selected next of another bird. Upon hatching its chick forces the others out of the nest, over the side. Such is the growth cycle of Relativity, as given by Einstein.

In order to understand the Einsteinian reasoning certain logical relationships are taken from “Relativity”, by Albert Einstein, Random House Publisher, 1916, page 50. Here given is;

(1) Proposition (A) is Electro-Dynamic Theory, Maxwell â€" Lorentz.

(2) Proposition (B) is Relativistic Theory Einstein â€" Minkowski.

(3) There are many experiments in favor of (A), or also in favor of (B).

(4) These experiments “limit the theoretical possibilities” so that only (A) holds to the test of experience.

(5) Certain experiments conform to (A) thru an “Auxiliary Hypothesis” which is “extraneous without (B).”

Consider Einstein’s statement on the same page 50;

“In the theoretical treatment of these electrons we are faced with the difficulty that electro-dynamic theory of itself is unable to give an account of their nature.” “For since electrical masses constituting the electron would necessarily be scattered under the influence of their mutual repulsions, unless there are forces of another kind operating between them the nature of which has hitherto remained obscure to us.”

Forces of another kind, you mean the dielectric lines of force, removed from obscurity by the Faraday â€" Thompson concept of induction? Every electron is a motional terminus of a quantity of dielectric lines of force, these lines contracting and stretching like rubber bands, giving motion to the terminus electron. The thermionic electron contracts, pulling the electron, the cathode ray stretching, pulled by the electron. In the former case the lines of force are dissipated, in the latter case the line of force are projected, both cases the electrons assume ray like motion, with non participating lines of force filling the voids, directing the electrons. Hence, it is the electrons travel in straight lines, that is, rays.

These facts have been known from the initial invention of the “Vacuum Tube” by Sir William Crookes, leading to the extensive experimental work into atomic science by J. J. Thompson, and Nikola Tesla. It is here seen that the so-called electron is only a shadow, its apparent physical mass is only an electrical momentum. There is no rest mass to an electron. It is given here the electron is no more than a broken loose “hold fast” under the grip of the tensions within the dielectric lines of force. They are the broken ends of the split in half package of spaghetti. Obviously this reasoning is not welcome in the realm of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Are we to believe that Einstein had no prior knowledge of the most prominent theoretical and experimental work of his time?

Continuing from “Relativity” by Albert Einstein, page 51.

“The second class of facts to which we have alluded has a reference to the question whether or not the motion of the Earth in space can be made perceptible in terrestrial experiments.”…”All attempts of this nature led to a negative result.” Einstein’s Relativity leads to the conclusion that no point of reference in the Galilean sense can actually exist, that is, all points of reference are relative to each other. This relativity is in a Lorentz transform rather that a Galilean Transform. No absolute reference possible, it is everything is relative. This is tantamount to the denial of the existence of God. Forgotten is that relativity did not find favor in its day, for this very reason, it is atheistic. Like Existentialism, or Cubism, Relativism represents a most destructive philosophical construct by which to afflict modern man. The destructive philosophical forces flowered as the “Third Reich”.

The monophasic dielectric forces developed thru the work of Nikola Tesla nullify relativistic relations. Tesla, thru a unique space-time hysteresis electrically “grounded” to a zero order Galilean coordinate system. It is also the cathode ray projector tubes utilized by Tesla in his atomic studies also nullify relativistic relations. Tesla’s remarks about “radiant matter” indicate the existence of cosmic rays of immense penetrating power moving fifty (50) times faster than the velocity of light (Le Sage particles). Here Albert Einstein is in direct contradiction with the experimental researches of Nikola Tesla, and in complete ignorance of the experimental researches of J. J. Thompson. Einstein “layed his egg” in the “nest of Faraday”. From here it is that “Theoretical Physics” is henceforth divorced from “Electrical Science”. In turn Theoretical Physics made a “Wh*re” of Maxwell, the “offspring” of Faraday.

Recently, in the “Los Angeles Times” newspaper, a series of page long editorials were given on Einstein, this as “Damage Control” over the European C.E.R.N. superluminal particle experiments. The L.A . Times is harsh, stating that C.E.R.N. was irresponsible, and must ask for permission to publish such findings! Later editorial writings express Einstein as the supreme authority, the spiritual master, etc. Well, after all, He pushed to make an E equals mc squared bomb to effect the genocide of the German People. A real holy man, don’t you think?

In epilogue, when Albert Einstein came to America, amid the accolades, and the fanfare, he was naturally introduced to T. A. Edison, the “Axle grease and timbers” all American Scientist-Inventor. The “coyote like” Edison cunningly produced one of his company intelligence tests for Einstein to complete. Einstein did not do so good on Edison’s company examination, he did not know the speed of sound! Is it possible here that Einstein is just another version of Marconi, both in defiance to Tesla. Finally, January 1, 200 A Time Magazine cover declares Albert Einstein the “Man of the Century”. We verily have been duped!

So here we stand. We have penetrated the Giant One Winged Parrot. While the multitudes have been quivering at the feet of this awesome idol, the Poodle went around to the rear of it, revealing no more than a diminutive circus operator at a small control panel. This formidable idol is no more than a giant CIRCUS PROP! Now can we go back to Kansas?

73 DE N6KPH SK

http://www.conspiracy.co/forums/main-wall/10372-story-eric-dollards-replications-teslas-free-energy-according-himself-4.html

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/1631-peter-whatever-happened-eric-p-dollard-21.html