Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

[7redorbs]

@ Redorbs, could you post a drawing of your setup and the connections to the battery ect?
It's a little hard to know exactly what you are showing.

Hey Scotty, thanks for asking, this is a good question. It was my mistake not including a picture where the light is on and you can see the rig more readily. I have also drawn a circuit diagram, with some descriptions of what I believe may be occuring. I see this from a electro mechanical perspective, and as a musician. With the understanding of how a human heart, or pipe organ works, it becomes clear that a vibrating wire has a different order differential to a regular running current. in the same way the spark gap generates additional voltage from aetheric plasma.

Anyway, this is how I think that it works. Please find both my diagram and decsription, as well as a picture of the rig in proper illuminated conditions. I have not forgot the question you asked about the N6KPH User Group Article I quoted from, the 93.3333% order of difference, etc. Explaining it away might be a mistake, so first I am trying to correlate why Tesla might have contradicted himself, if not whether the N6KPH historic source was inaccurate somehow about the quotation given by Tesla,

I really really need help with these experiments with someone with an expensive high frame rate camera. I believe you will catch nobel prize winning stuff about that blue vertical that currently I can only speculate about. Also a camera that was electrically and thermally sensitive might make more sense.....

Best,
A

[Doug1]

Orb
Use short exposure 35mm film in a dark room but expose it longer so you can get the view of the light over a longer period of time.Smoke in the air will trace out any beam patern and expose it as well.You might be able to find someone with a fog machine they can loan you.

[scotty1]

Thanks for the diagram Redorbs. 
Here is the first Tesla quote " On further investigation I found that this gas was so light that a volume equal to that of the earth would weigh only about one-twentieth of a pound." (nikola tesla tells of new radio theories)

Here is the other quote. "The ether, although the most tenuous of all substances, is no exception to this rule.  Its density has been first estimated by Lord Kelvin and conformably to his finding a column of one square centimeter cross section and of a length such that light, traveling at a rate of three hundred thousands kilometers per second, would require one year to traverse it, should weigh 4.8 grams." (the eternal source of energy of the universe, the origin and intensity of cosmic rays)....both found here. http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/contents.htm

Btw....I play music as well. Here is something I made for a good friend of mine. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-JnOKH8Jf4

[scotty1]

@Derek.....my explanation about facing East was only one of a few reasons as you note....
Ed also faced East when he made his measurements of the Earth's true path, using his polaris telescope and sundial ect.
The compass dial he used to mark his findings has "looking East" written on it as well.
In fact....alot of the tests in Magnetic Currents have multiple meanings and when cross referenced, lead to other information.
I've attatched a pic of Ed's compass dial that i edited. (the words on the original pic were hard to read so i put them in bold)

[sparks]

The Earth is moving at 600km/sec towards the constellation Leo, along with the rest of the galaxy and alot of other galaxies.  This motion is relative to the cosmic background radiation which is in the microwave spectrum.  (If you have a circuit and receiver that is tuned into this signal then you'll get some energy out of the vacuum.)  So if you look at just one point on Earth from a fixed position in the cmbr with your back to Leo the point on Earth would be doing a very complicated dance.  Small rotation of 1000mph and a large rotation at 60,000 mph solar rotation   and an even larger rotation at the galactic rotating mph.  Speeding up and slowing down really complicated to think about.  Einstein or someone finally threw in the towel and said that motion only exists relative to the observer.  The observers motrion is irrelavent.  This is really counterproductive.  Everything we see is an abberation.  Granted 600km/sec is not even close to 300,000 km/sec but it is way faster than our fastest vehicles.  Can this motion be exploited?  Say we have a coil of wire with an attached voltmeter or led.  This coil of wire is actually moving 600km/sec.  We know the coil is not going to generate any voltage unless the magnetic field it passes through is changing perpendicular to the coils motion.  So we have a set of permanent magnets but they are also moving 6ookm/sec.  What if we can somehow make the permanent magnets stay put.  This would require that we move the magnets relative to the wire and moving them would require energy to overcome the inertia of the permanent magnets mass. Hmmm.  What would happen if we create a magnetic field  disruption that appears to move from our observation post but in reality stays fixed as our coil moves through it.  Our coil would have to move perpendicular to the produced magnetic field.  The magnetic field would have to move away from the constellation Leo at 600km/sec and the coil aligned to intersect this "moving" magnetic field.  No small task.