a new kind of visible radiant energy?

[Cloxxki]

I'll be sitting front row at your video!

[david lambright]

Ed said that soft iron " threw off" magnets better than other metals. he also said the magnets circulated in the metal. this is a quote; " but are running many times wound until the North and South Pole individual magnets get thrown out of the wire by centrifugal force", so what he is saying is that these magnets have weight! or they are what make weight, and what is weight but gravity?[/size]

[sm0ky2]

Ed said that soft iron " threw off" magnets better than other metals. he also said the magnets circulated in the metal. this is a quote; " but are running many times wound until the North and South Pole individual magnets get thrown out of the wire by centrifugal force", so what he is saying is that these magnets have weight! or they are what make weight, and what is weight but gravity?[/size]

sorry i should have been more clear,. as my understanding has moved beyond Ed's descriptions......
When i say more "magnetically conductive", im talking about the metals ability to alow transition of the magnetic loops through itself. i.e. - the resistance to the magnetic point charges moving in a vortex through the metal.

The atoms in a paramagnetic material allign with the magnetic vector, creating a conductive path through the material.  In comparison to something like copper, or aluminum - the velocity of the particles through the material is higher. But, in contrast to a gas (like air) or empty space,.... there is still a considerable ammount of magnetic resistance, which keeps the magnetic point charges as subluminal velocities.

outside of the soft iron, the loops again travel at close to light speeds, which is why the field spreads out the further away from the iron you get. This is due to Einsteinian special relativity. - which only applies to the velocities of the magnetic point charges, not the propegation of the field itself.

When ed uses the term "throws off", he is implying that the external portion of the field loops is larger than it might be wth a different material, thus containing more magnetic point charges.
Eds experimental results of this, are a stronger magnetic induction when the field interacts with another piece of metal.

[david lambright]

hi

Comment on your video: MAGNETIC LEAD !
"I was able to magnetize bismuth and zinc. I will post video soon!! I wasn't able to see the dimension of the toroid P.M.H. that you used so I guessed and had a local fabrication shop roll a 7' by 5/8" thick steel bar for me and it has a little more than a two foot inner circumference. It will lock with a 12v low amps tap but I used a car battery to do my experiments for the amperage" ...; this was posted by coffinboxman on my youtube channel. i apologize for not getting the experiments you all have requested on video, it is not as easy as seems. i would love nothing more than to have PROOF on video of my claims, but here's the thing, i am not trying to prove that this energy is REAL, i am trying to show how different this energy field is from ANYTHING i have seen before. bear with me please, i know there is lots of interest in this, but if this energy was easy to see or measure or capture an image of, it would have been done long ago. there should not be any question as to whether or not it is real, enough people have seen it or have replicated these devices and seen and felt the things i describe, for themselves, to answer that question. i have said form the beginning how subtle and difficult it is to see, [a flowing energy field], let alone to capture images of. i really believe that there must be some frame dragging happening at the center of my device. the optical illusion created when it is rotated VERY slowly and then stopped, i am talking a single revolution here, distorts the view too much for too long to be explained away as moot. i will try something. rather than trying to image what i see and then try to point it out to you, i have drawn some diagrams that i will video, in the hope to better illustrate what i am seeing. i am also hoping that you will let me know if this helps at all. what i see - YouTube

[sm0ky2]

hey Dave, glad to see you still at it.

i think you should take a look at this here,. it kind of pertains to what yur into now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_magnetic_resonance

cheers