a new kind of visible radiant energy?

[Rosemary Ainslie]

And guys, at the risk of waxing philosophical - let me stress this.  We really do NEED to keep this knowledge OPEN and the more answers we find here the better.  Else I strongly suspect that this knowledge may become the 'exclusive' province of those hyper trained - highly qualified physicists who will gain MORE from keeping the thinking 'obtuse' than by making it readily understandable. 

I'm rather committed to the belief that physics is essentially simple.  And I'm trying hard to keep it that way.  As ever - my own bench mark is my own lack of scientific aptitude.  And if I can understand it then anyone can.  LOL.  But having said that I keep hearing that my writing is NOT understood.  If so - then please get me to explain it better.  I can but try. 

But I'm sure you all see the significance of this.  It's amazing stuff. 

Regards,
Rosemary

[Rosemary Ainslie]

@ rose
i tried to draw this out for you
when you alter the interaction between the nucleii and the electrons, by changing their orbital vector,
you essentially are changing the way each atom interacts with the one its adjoined to.

where they "share" orbital path components, is where they "bond".

if the paths change, so does the bonds.

hope this helps. the picture in the middle is my atomic description of magnetism.

Sm0ky - you're right and you're absolutely right.  There is no question that the interactions can be explained in terms of the electron's varying orbits.  But that's all done on the postulate that the electron itself is generating a magnetic field.  It does nothing to explain the 'magnetic' field that is then generated.  And classical physics relies on the electron as the 'charge' carrier. 

I'm not arguing classical physics.  It's been proven at levels and at standards that I could NEVER hope to emulate.  And I'm ill equipped to argue it.  But classical CANNOT explain the 'jitter' - the casimir effect - gravity - even the electromagnetic interaction.  Locality questions.  LOTS OF QUESTIONS Sm0ky.  It can ONLY measure it.  In other words - we still have NO HANDLE on the SOURCE of energy itself. 

What I've proposed is another 'force'.  But it's not another force - it's simply the magnetic field as a primary force.  The numbers stack.  It certainly doesn't conflict with the extraordinary reach and achievements of our scientists - and, it may possibly explain those many outstanding questions that we all are obliged to entertain if we stick to the standard quantum and classical explanations.  And remember that while both these disciplines are interrelated - they come from two different ends of the scientific spectrum and they NEVER quite meet int the middle. 

In any event.  My thesis is NOT the discussion here.  Sorry for introducing it.  What is under discussion is the possibility that we're uncovering the actual 'force' that is responsible for all energy.  And this has serious implications on gravity.  And I think it's clear to us all that the Lambright Effect definitely speaks to a gravity field.  Certainly that's my take.

Kindest again
Rosemary

BTW your illustrations are EXCELLENT. 

[sm0ky2]

...I'm rather committed to the belief that physics is essentially simple...

On a philosophical level, is it very simple. and it's all the same, "universal" if you will.
the large is just a reflection of the small.
and the very large is a relfection of the large.
and so on.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

On a philosophical level, is it very simple. and it's all the same, "universal" if you will.
the large is just a reflection of the small.
and the very large is a relfection of the large.
and so on.

Here we're in perfect synch.

[sm0ky2]

i dont want to get too off topic with this,
but we can delve a little deeper into the rabbit hole..

These "pieces of the atom" are magnetic in nature.
the electrons motion is what causes it to be electric.
it moves because its attracted to everything. except for an adequately strong electric charge to repel its own charge.

every orbit causes a "magnetic moment". the vector of the magnetic field is exactly the same as in an electric coil, or two neutron stars orbiting one another.

when you allign these orbits onto a planar axis (magnetize them) this causes these magnetic moments, to ( on average) occur in the same vectoral direction.

forcing this to occur in a copper wire (coil), causes heat as well as magnetism. all the forces of nature are magnetic in origin.