Self-Runner NS Coil Pulse Motor Live Video Stream. It's been going for months!

[Groundloop]

Rosemary,

The easiest way to make a low friction rotor is to disassemble
a computer fan. Take out the electronics, the toroid magnet and
cut of the fan blades. Glue Neo magnets on the outside of remaining hub.
If you use a fan that have two ball bearings then apply some lubricant
to the bearings before assembling the fan again. (Not needed on a new fan.)

Groundloop.

[dllabarre]

Whenever I search for iron/metal rods they all have code numbers.
What is soft iron: "1018 Cold Rolled Steel Round Bar"?
Or something else.
I'm not looking for a core thats "good enough".
I want to buy what works "best" for the core and if it's too expensive what's "second best". 

What size (AWG) copper cotton insulated wire and iron wire to buy and where to buy if possible?

Thank you,
DonL

[Omnibus]

Am I clear?     Not actually Omnibus.  I'm actually rather amused at your description of yourself as an intellectual.  Shouldn't you show us some evidence of more than average intellect - if you claim to be an 'intellectual'?  I would have thought?   And this 'fight for truth'?  When you barely acquaint yourself with the facts of the case.  LOL.  And that you will not allow 'stupidity to overwhelm discussions' and then - on 'important matters'.  LOL.  It's rich.  The only thing that's overwhelmed the last pages on this otherwise pristine thread - is your own stupidity.

I think it was YOU who determined that lasersaber's experiment was 'trivial' and his rights to post on his experiment - questionable.  By contrast you do what?  I keep asking this.  WHAT HAVE YOU DONE HERE?  You seem to feel you have every right to comment, rather freely at that - or fancifully - or wildly - in any event - entirely incorrectly - on an experiment where you also - self evidently - have NO knowledge the experimental apparatus or it's test objects.  Then you demand irrelevant explanations for that same apparatus while you continue to parade the extent of your own ignorance and presumption.   

Frankly I think it is YOUR comments that are trivial and YOUR rights to comment questionable.  And I think the only person here who has shown us the most alarming level of stupidity is yourself.  With respect.  Actually - not so much.

Again
Rosemary

Nonsense. Read what I write and try to understand it. This thread is about a proposed experiment and it is obvious that the experiment in question is trivial and should not be encouraged. On the other hand, what I've done in the area of OU is not the subject of this thread and only a stupid person will try such an attack at someone pointing the irrelevance of the proposal at hand.

[Omnibus]

Here are some photos of my crude attempts at this from a while ago.  As I have said, we all did learn a few things and, yes my coil, seen here with one layer of windings only, did have an output after building and before placing in the ground, when it was totally dry.

So to answer a few questions asked of me here, yes, the 2 metals are totally insulated from each other and yes there was a dry output, although not as much as after I wet it and let it dry.  No other electrolyte was added.

Lasersaber put it best and it basically summed up our understanding of this coil from back then in that it is partially some sort of galvanic reaction and also it is something else.  Otherwise, if galvanic was all this ever was, why would NS's coils not break down after years in the ground?  Maybe it is a very, very efficient type of controlled galvanic reaction?  I do not really know and do not claim to know.

The 2nd and 3rd photos are of my larger coil which actually has 2 layers of primary such that all the wire ends can be on the same end as NS has done it and now Lasersaber.  The max. mA's output from this small coil was 47.2.  The core was a galvanized iron spike that had very strong attraction to my test neos in the store.

I hope this answers those questions asked of me but, I am telling you that Lasersaber is setting the pace here and is far beyond what our group was able to do.  My suggestion is that for those that see this as I, and many others do, keep following and try replicating.  For those who think it is nothing new and not worthy of messing with....then don't.

Bill

I disagree that this question should be left hanging and those who don't understand that galvanic potentials are trivial should be left unchecked. First it should be understood that wetting the separator, that is, making the two dissimilar metals in contact through an electrolyte disqualifies at once the setup in question as being an OU. Therefore, experiments with wet separators should never be mentioned in the context of OU (unless some extremely precise measurements are made, beyond the scope of this discussion, showing OU; without such any implying that a wet cell may be OU is plain wrong).

Secondly, I disagree that @laseraber is setting the pace in this. if what you say is real then you would be the one setting the pace (@laseraber's being being only a forseeable application of what you've done). Therefore, it is extremely important to go back to your experiments and verify especially that the metals are in no contact whatsoever and that you can measure a potential even when the coil placed in a Faraday cage.

As for the setup remaining intact despite the galvanic potentials developed across, it is quite usual -- think about the amalgam fillings some people have or the various dentures -- galvanic potentials are there and yet the dentures and the fillings remain intact for years. In fact changing them is never because of the galvanic potentials developing.

[happyfunball]

Nonsense. Read what I write and try to understand it. This thread is about a proposed experiment and it is obvious that the experiment in question is trivial and should not be encouraged. On the other hand, what I've done in the area of OU is not the subject of this thread and only a stupid person will try such an attack at someone pointing the irrelevance of the proposal at hand.

Really petty uncool and unnecessary. This guy didn't have to post his experiment here, and clearly stated it's not OU. How about you produce a working OU device, not just data, or shut up.