Lets put an end to the UFO debate

[TechStuf]

Why, mr. inebriated, should I refer you to einstein? Whatever truths he managed to see, such glimpses were bestowed from his position after climbing upon the shoulders of those taller than he.  No, what I will do is refer you to the following definition, originally posted higher in the thread by Poit.

"In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into a desired emotional response[1] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[2] In addition to the offending poster, the noun troll can also refer to the provocative message itself, as in "that was an excellent troll you posted". ......."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29

Why should you waste critical thought processes on controlling time when you cannot even control your tongue? 

Go play somewhere else.



Blessings in Yeshua, Jesus Christ

[WilbyInebriated]

Why, mr. inebriated, should I refer you to einstein? Whatever truths he managed to see, such glimpses were bestowed from his position after climbing upon the shoulders of those taller than he.  No, what I will do is refer you to the following definition, originally posted higher in the thread by Poit.

Why should you waste critical thought processes on controlling time when you cannot even control your tongue? 

Go play somewhere else.



Blessings in Yeshua, Jesus Christ

so that's a no then. you have nothing of substance, just flights of fancy...

[gravityblock]

Time is the result of the force that impels a body through space. The greater the force the shorter the time, and the shorter also the space to be traversed. Thus, if the force were infinitely great, time and space would be infinitely small, they would cease to exist.

We need to see whether a theory corresponds with the method Nature uses. We can advance a thousand rational hypotheses, whereas Nature makes use of only one, rejecting the other, however rational they may be, or again it may not even make use of any of them.

Relativity contains certain erroneous elements which in themselves can be called rational, but which Nature, according to the view of Sir James Jeans, appears to disregard. For example, it is an accepted mechanical theory that if two rays move in the same direction at the same speed, their velocity in relation to one another is nil, but if they move in opposite directions, the velocity of the one in relation to the other is 2V. However, in order to cope with certain difficulties in his system, Einstein affirmed that whether the rays move in one direction or another, the velocity between them is always V.  It is not necessary to have much imagination to see that this principle is false.

In order to justify this fallacy, Einstein invented another greater one. He attributed a space and a time appropriate to each moving body, according to its speed. But as one error leads mankind to another greater one, he had now to produce a third idea in order to justify the second. He then set confines to the Universe, marking out a particular space for us. But Nature disregards imaginary enclosures, and our desire that the Universe should conform to our particular points of view, as well as our carefully thought out ideas. Throughout she behaves as though she were ignorant of Hamilton's calculus and the importance which people attach to formulas.

In short, you can see that the frontiers proposed by Einstein were too narrow to contain what is by nature infinite. Space is indivisible and time is non-existent. The latter is merely a convention based on the movement of the stars. It is merely an effect.  If the movement of a body, or the acceleration of a mass, is due to force, time is then an effect of the force and the latter' is the cause. But if the force varies and is consumed, time will vary accordingly. Now, as space is a constant, it is difficult to imagine how you could create a time/space constant, let alone regard it as a dimension in itself. This is an example of Nature disregarding these things. If one multiplies two dimensions one gets the area. If one multiplies area by height, one gets the volume. Now, if one multiplies this volume by a fourth dimension, one only gets nonsense.

In space, a body does not travel in four, three, two, or one dimension, because space, being infinite, has no dimensions whatsoever. We can, at the most, say that a body obeys a direction of stress when it moves from point A to point B.  Up to a point Einstein was right in saying that a moving body in space has its own time, because when one leaves the Earth there is a change in what is conventionally known as terrestrial time; but basically he was wrong. Time is based on the period a moving body takes to return to its point of departure, and is thus the result of a circular movement.

He made a further mistake when he assumed that every moving body created a space of its own and peculiar to itself. The precession of Mercury's perihelion, which gave rise to this theory, is due to the planet's proximity to the Sun. As it moves closer to the Sun, it receives more light, rotates more rapidly and moves through space with greater speed.

GB

[TechStuf]

flights of fancy

You got Flights and Fancy correct.


Who knew.  But then, they say that even a broken clock is right twice a day.


TS

[fritznien]

You got Flights and Fancy correct.


Who knew.  But then, they say that even a broken clock is right twice a day.


TS

maybe so but its still a paper wieght.