Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Relative Permittivity of Water

Started by Torana, October 14, 2010, 04:35:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 15 Guests are viewing this topic.

Torana

wfc ...heard of Mr jaycar or Mr Trademe ?
(2nd H inv can be ...re entered down the track ).
Cars have power supplies ...think . I was going to get into that later .
I already linked a stereo

http://www.educypedia.be/electronics/electronicaopening.htm  ITS FREE AND ACCURATE !

Torana

H2O,
In post #120 you gave the impression ......

*****" Basically from how I see things ..ONE has to be a MECHANIC and a science BUFF"*****

I would say " ONE WOULD HAVE TO BE! "

We both know YOUR NOT A MECHANIC!
That has been a self evident evolution      .....Youve hatched!

On your heretical thread you got a circuit by RORY ...of none other than a XENON TIMING LIGHT / STROBE
Guess again...Hes a KIWI from christchurch NZ
Guess yet again ....hes from a forum with ME!
Shes a small world is NZ....little country with a lotta punch!....No kick in the nuts tho.. its all above the belt

Mechanics have a fair knowledge of semicons and AUTO ELECTRICS! !........fault finding , points of measurement
A mechanic wouldve responded to what Ive said in a certain way.....and replied .

wfchobby

Hi Torana,
lol ive been to jaycar and trademe many times.

The fundamental flaw in the 8xa design to my mind is the reliance on the sine wave frequency of the main supply which is switched through the scr.

The way I see it - car ECU are designed to filter out alternator noise and to rely upon their own frequency data signals for their communication and as such any frequency board for a cell/injector should be designed with that as primary focus, not a workshop bench mains power based supply for it seems counter intuitive to think a 120v american based powersupply will give the same result on a power supply in another country using a different mains supply specification.


h20power

Quote from: Torana on September 24, 2011, 12:29:05 AM
Hello H2o my ol friend,

stans fig are for INJECTION ,  I calc  LA to NY by info given , micro litre INJECTION , Rev of crank , Hour , Minute , second  , Mile .

****NOTICE.. it does not say Ohio - LA - NY - Ohio ..  (Whoops ! ! )
...it IS completely THEORETICAL  =  ****NON FACTUAL****

I was being GENEROUS by using IMPERIAL GALLONS

65 MPH @ 25 MP,Litre of WATER

2462 miles / 25 miles = 98.48 LITRES of WATER in the TANK
98.48 litres / 4.55 litres = 21.64 IMPERIAL GALLONS
98.48 litres / 3.79 litres = 25.98 US GALLONS

If US gallon is used then stan was a LIER ! !

***IF YOUR proving stans figures were BOGUS then YOUR the stan HATER and IM the STAN FAN  ? ?
....NICE TURN AROUND ! !

I was trying to make the fig work without manipulation....It says "22 GALLONS "...NOT US or IMPERIAL..

First off we are not friends by a long shot. If I were to meet you...well lets just say it wouldn't be a nice meeting.

My chemistry instructor taught us to keep things in the same units if you want to compare them. I took Meyer's numbers given in the technical brief(TB) from ml/min to L/min going from water to it's components hydrogen and oxygen  gas for the given amount of liquid water used per minute Meyer put in the TB. It is written in the TB as 44.4 ml/min of water consumption. From there is where I got my numbers. Since you have ten years at Meyer's work which somehow makes you the overriding authority on the topic you should have read that and done the same since those are not the units we are all working with.

You have ten years of wasted time as you have nothing to show for your work. Ten long years of nothing, no wonder why your all pissed off at Meyer. But it is you who you should be pissed off at for not asking any questions to lead to real answers and for not following the scientific method and not looking to science for the answers.

So I took the 44.4ml of water converted that to grams of hydrogen and oxygen, then converted that to liters of hydrogen and oxygen gas at STP. Simple huh? Then why is it in all the time you been at this you haven't run the numbers like this before? The reason I took these numbers is Meyer put that in writing in the TB.

I then gave, in my last post, a comparison of just how the system works. Why then when I come back to read this thread has no one commented on that? Was the information self evident thus any fool could have figure this out or was it that the information given is of already known information? If that is the case then why hasn't anyone ever talked about Meyer's work like this before? Everyone should understand how a gasoline reaction works to power a car, and I just showed how the Gas Processor changes the atmosphere inside of the engine's intake system to one that is suitable for the combustion of water. But no one reading this thread seems to want that kind of information as all the post afterwards are about nothing worth reading.

Oh the 8xa circuit uses a 60 Hz sin wave....and I don't like it...blah, blah, blah. It was used in the Independent International Test-Evaluation Report to show that the technology was better than Dr. Faraday's method. I think the guy who tried to warn me that writing in this thread was a pure waste of time since no one reading it wants the technology was right. As from looking at the post after my last posting no one cares for the technology who are reading this thread.

prove me wrong then everyone as I truly do see anyone asking questions about the technology and how it works in this thread.

h2opower

Torana

OUCH! ! !
Your Tutor should see the tech brief..
Why would I spend 10 years on WFC **AFTER** working out stans info and TB in the 1990s ? ?
Why work against myself?  ....Counter productive

Im NOT pissed at stan ..WHY?  He never conned me!

I am NOT the over riding authority on stan meyers Theres a mountain of electricians and electronics guys who have found the same thing as I have,  its standard practice to analyse available info.

Im giving people a heads up , its a personal choice if people follow the TB info, I think people should have that freedom.

At the start of the thread I said "Im NOT trying to prove anyone wrong"
Im ALSO NOT trying to STOP anyone ...What for? ?

Ive put links to YOUR thread s , and IM the one getting pm on instruction to make it! (?)

THATS YOUR JOB! !
Help me out...Im directing them to YOU!    TAKE THEM!


http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7030.240