Do you naturally doubt new device xyz has any chance of overunity? are you sure the new guy posting a free energy device is scamming everyone?
do you persist in mistrusting new out of the box ideas?
well it looks like your lifespan is going to be shorter and dementia will rule your future along with other maladies.
news article on your type:
Curmudgeons of the world, listen up: This line of negative thinking might actually hurt your health.
A new study in the latest edition of Neurology, the journal of the American Academy of Neurology, found that cynical people have a higher likelihood of developing dementia.
"There have been previous studies that showed that people who were cynical were more likely to die earlier and have other poor health outcomes, but no one that we could
tell ever looked at dementia," said Anna-Maija Tolppanen, one of the study's authors and a professor at the University of Eastern Finland. "We have seen some studies that
show people who are more open and optimistic have a lower risk for dementia so we thought this was a good question to ask."
Studying cynicism
Summary: The most cynical people in this study had more than double the risk of dementia
Cynicism is also linked to higher rates of cancer-related deaths and cardiovascular disease
Cynical people tend to have a greater stress response, which can lead to inflammation
Cynicism is a deep mistrust of others. Psychologists consider it a kind of chronic anger that develops over time.
Specifically, the kind of cynicism researchers looked at involved doubting the truth of what people say and believing most people are motivated by self-interest rather than
by what is best for the community.
Village only for people with dementia
The study tested 1,449 people with an average age of 71. The study participants took a test for dementia. A separate test measured their level of cynicism. Both tests are
considered reliable by researchers.
The cynicism test asks if the person agrees with statements like "Most people will use somewhat unfair reasons to gain profit or an advantage rather than lose it"; "I think
most people would lie to get ahead"; and "It is safer to trust nobody."
Those who agreed with the critical statements in the test were considered highly cynical. The people with the highest level of cynical distrust had a 2.54 times greater risk
of dementia than those with the lowest cynicism rating.
Researchers also examined the test results to see if the subjects who were labeled highly cynical died sooner than the others. But once compounding factors were screened
out, they did not. Previous studies have shown a link between cynicism and an earlier death.
Still, the new study does not prove that having a bad attitude causes bad health outcomes. To prove a causal relationship, a study would need randomized controlled trials to
show that a reduction in cynical attitudes through treatment actually lowered the risk of bad health outcomes.
More research is necessary to replicate the conclusions. But the results complement a wide body of research showing how "over time, people with highly cynical hostility do
worse health wise," said Dr. Hilary Tindle, assistant professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh.
Why cynicism may be bad for you
What might explain an association between cynicism and poor health?
This is a complex issue that needs to be studied more, Tindle said. The relationships between psychological attitudes and health outcomes are very complex.
"I can tell you from my clinical perspective from treating patients, I am absolutely certain that psychological attitudes can lead people down a road to poor health, because
I see it every day when I talk to patients," said Tindle, who wrote the book "Up: How Positive Outlook Can Transform Our Health and Aging."
Tindle was the lead author on a study that examined the health outcomes of over 97,000 women and found that cynical women had a higher hazard of cancer-related mortality.
"The bottom line is that a high degree of anger/hostility/cynicism is not good for health," she wrote.
Research shows cynical people also tend to smoke more, exercise less and weigh more. They also have a harder time following even the best medical advice, because their
cynical natures won't let them believe what people tell them, Tindle said.
Cat defrauded out of big inheritance when owner suffers dementia
Past studies have also found that people who are cynical have a higher rate of coronary heart disease, cardiovascular problems and cancer-related deaths. Cardiovascular disease
can contribute to dementia because it essentially damages small blood vessels everywhere in your body, including in your brain.
Cynical people also tend to have greater stress responses, which means they typically have a higher heart rate, a higher blood pressure peak, and a tendency to have greater
inflammation of their immune systems. Chronic inflammation is now known to be harmful to one's overall health and it is linked to everything from Crohn's disease to high
cholesterol to even Alzheimer's.
Do what makes you happy
Can you come out of cynicism?
The good news is, being highly cynical is not a permanent state of mind.
"I am also certain that people can learn to change -- they change every day in that they quit smoking, they lose weight, they cut ties in unhealthy friendships," Tindle said.
"The ultimate message is people are not 'doomed' if they have cynical tendencies."
So if your assumptions about people are making you angry and irritable, try having a little more trust.
"All of us are capable of adopting healthier attitudes," Tindle said. "As a physician, I see people of all ages making positive change every day."
Yes living with the fairies in blissful ignorance of real problems and just accepting everything anyone tells us may reduce stress and lead to better health. Or it could lead to us being fleeced of our hard earned wealth in one foul swoop and cause long lived depression and poverty.
Maybe you are confusing cynics with skeptics.
Sounds like there is some truth that too much stress is bad for us, but are cynical people more stressed or are stressed people more cynical.
As people age and learn more truths they see how much BS they have been led to believe and become cynical, probably wishing they had been more skeptical. Are young children cynical ? Are young children skeptical ? I know kids that have learned to be skeptical because they have been lied to so much. Cause and effect, not effect and cause.
..
The OP seems to confuse cynicism with skepticism.
I have been called a troll by steeltpu. That is so sad.
Here I am APPLYING THE PRINCIPLES OF OU in a solid and undeniably correct fashion to show that a single mouse can power the entire world (albeit for only a short period of time, they keep dying. I still haven't found the right cheese yet)
There is NOTHING in my claim that breaks the principle of OU.
So why are people like steeltpu being so mean? They don't understand what this breakthrough means to the world. This is serious stuff. I am not a troll I am trying to solve the worlds energy crisis.
SteelTPU I declare it is you who are employed by the big oil companies to stop people when a true breakthrough is made. It is you who selectively chooses who to attack. Which technologies to try and cover up.
You are looking to destroy the reputation of those people who have the true ability to make changes to the world and foster those who clearly don't.
And you hide behind the mask of a true believer.
I researched the dementia study and found the flaw in their argument.
They didn't take into account believers don't use their brain at all and so you cannot tell whether they have dementia or not.
Its funny that in place of actually producing over unity in its place stands talk of the skeptics!
What comes next, blaming a high rise building for the cause of suicides?
Quote from: ACG on May 30, 2014, 10:47:03 PM
Its funny that in place of actually producing over unity in its place stands talk of the skeptics!
Ummm....what?
Bill
Quote from: Pirate88179 on May 31, 2014, 07:32:33 AM
Ummm....what?
Bill
Perhaps the poster is trying to express the ironic fact that most of what is _actually known_ and verifiable around here, meaning all the various projects, systems, claims and proposals.... most of the real knowledge seems to have come from those very "skeptics" themselves. By analyzing claims and systems, doing their own work, learning how to use their equipment and software properly, and communicating effectively, the "skeptics" have added much to knowledge and have cleared up many misconceptions and exposed many false claims.
On the other hand maybe the poster is trying to repeat that old canard that the skeptics somehow are preventing the True Believers from being able to reach their goals. (How this magical and powerful influence happens, exactly, is never explained.)
Well, I believe that I will live longer knowing what is real, and what is a scam. At the very least, I will be able to keep what little money I now have.
If someone did a real, actual study on this, I believe that the life of those who scam are much shorter. They probably die from the stress of worrying about being found out, or by meeting someone whom they scammed who demands a reckoning.
Bill
Quote from: Pirate88179 on May 31, 2014, 12:45:11 PM
If someone did a real, actual study on this, I believe that the life of those who scam are much shorter. They probably die from the stress of worrying about being found out, or by meeting someone whom they scammed who demands a reckoning.
If a "scammer" possessed what is considered to be
a normal conscience or the ability to feel remorse
that may be the case.
True Scammers seem to be somehow "protected"
so as not to suffer those consequences. Particularly
those who have risen to the top of the Scammer
Pyramid at the level of the All Seeing Eye.
Nearly 100% of the "politicians" in America, Canada,
Mexico and the European Union fit into that category.
Quote from: MarkE on May 30, 2014, 02:10:19 PM
The OP seems to confuse cynicism with skepticism.
while slightly different it's a fine line between the two
Quote from: CuriousChris on May 30, 2014, 07:52:58 PM
I have been called a troll by steeltpu. That is so sad.
Here I am APPLYING THE PRINCIPLES OF OU in a solid and undeniably correct fashion to show that a single mouse can power the entire world (albeit for only a short period of time, they keep dying. I still haven't found the right cheese yet)
There is NOTHING in my claim that breaks the principle of OU.
So why are people like steeltpu being so mean? They don't understand what this breakthrough means to the world. This is serious stuff. I am not a troll I am trying to solve the worlds energy crisis.
SteelTPU I declare it is you who are employed by the big oil companies to stop people when a true breakthrough is made. It is you who selectively chooses who to attack. Which technologies to try and cover up.
You are looking to destroy the reputation of those people who have the true ability to make changes to the world and foster those who clearly don't.
And you hide behind the mask of a true believer.
no not going to play. unilke tinsel and milehigh who while overly skepticall actually contribute around here you are nothing more than a loud bad fart in a small room. people laugh at first but then they are disgusted.
That's only because you can't play this game.
You know that your logic is deficient. You know that any attempt to support overunity results in ridiculous outcomes that are clearly impossible. but rather than give up on your silly beliefs you choose to ignore them. Instead to denigrate those who would point out the lack of reasoning in your thoughts.
Rather than put together a cogent line of reasoning in support of the possibility of OU. You instead go on the attack.
Why don't you stand up for what you believe in, instead of sticking your head in the sand?
As for tinsel I don't know what floats his boat, Very intelligent but he is involved in a multiyear argument with an insane rosemary perhaps he doesn't want the trip to end, personally I don't have that sort of spare time. I can't speak of milehigh.
The challenge stands.
If you believe in OU explain why MEP is not possible and at the same time OU is. Remove the mouse and replace it with ANY source of energy you want if that makes you feel better. a battery perhaps, A small generator, whatever you need. If the math worries you replace 200% with whatever you feel is realistic. 120% 1200% whatever swings your bat it doesn't matter.
Oh and I guess I should speak of my reasoning for being here and taking this rubbish on. diseases need to be attacked. take a look at homeopathy. its a cancer that does no good and is known to do harm. the anti vaccination morons. These are people who with no knowledge and only misinformation, while living with a bubble mentality* put the world at great risk. They don't understand the evil of what they are doing. and overunity frauds they take people away from looking for real and possible solutions and instead feed them false arguments about how evil governments are hiding the truth from them. I am here to protect my children from people like you.
You should be ashamed of being part of that disease.
But you will continue to deny the truth and you will continue to believe in falsehoods. Why? because like the scorpion that's what you are.
*bubble mentality: groups of people who feed information to each other in a closed environment, refusing to look out side the bubble to other explanations and failing to research what they choose to believe. In the bubble, lies quickly become accepted as fact.
@Chris: You are way behind the times, dude. Ainslie has collapsed in a puddle of her own mendacity and lies, and her silly delusions aren't worth discussing any more. Since she is unable to produce any valid data, and since her previously produced data has been shown to be an assortment of lies, fabrications and incompetent errors, she isn't worthy of any attention at all. I'm ready to refute her if she comes up with anything new, but there isn't any point in sorting her garbage: it will still be garbage even after it's sorted.
The QEG people have raised my ire, now that Wayne Travis has also faded back into the dusty red lowlands of southern Oklahoma.
Meanwhile I'm still working on my own interests: For example I have a reedswitched pulse motor on my bench right now that "works" at under 0.1 volt input, wayy less than one milliWatt, and it's not a tiny leeeetle water-generator thingy either. And when it's fed with an entire full One Volt, it makes enough spike voltage to flash a NE-2 neon.
A quote from wiki. I wonder if the analyst is real or made up, and if real is it just his opinion..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy
QuoteA document released by the NGIC shows there is ongoing worldwide research into zero-point energy, particular in China, Germany, Russia and Brazil. An analyst of the Defense Intelligence Agency has indicated that research into successfully harnessing zero-point energy for energy generation purposes is a serious concern inside the intelligence community
NGIC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Ground_Intelligence_Center
Really hilarious. The energy generation part makes me giggle.
..
Countries without this earth shaking technology complain that they have been frozen out.
Well if the wiki was untrue then the U.S. gov should have it removed as lies. If the wiki is true and the D.I.A. is seriously concerned about it then it would make sense that they would run operations to distract and misinform but it would not make sense to make it public they were concerned about it. And if they are concerned about it being a national security/defence issue, then that lends credence to the possibility of being able to harness significant energy from the Quantum vacuum/fields.
Maybe a patriot U.S. citizen should email them and ask if it is true and why it is on the wiki if not true ? ;D
A curious wiki entry. I realize anyone can edit wiki. But surely the U.S. gov. should be able to force wiki to remove lies and ban those who edit in lies about the U.S. Gov. They either know about the wiki or they don't. We don't know which.
Maybe it could explain some of the good fakes and why a lot of scammers don't get prosecuted. Maybe the scammers actions are good in the eyes of the D.I.A..
On the scale of state sponsored/ignored crimes it would be very low anyway. Compared to drone strikes ect.
..
. - microdot
O they have a limited future alright.
Its a good thing that I got my bunker half built by coincidence, and all my gear in the works. Just maybe I'll have time.
Then I'll kiss the profanes goodbye.
Quote from: TinselKoala on May 31, 2014, 08:51:02 PM
@Chris: You are way behind the times, dude. Ainslie has collapsed in a puddle of her own mendacity and lies, and her silly delusions aren't worth discussing any more. Since she is unable to produce any valid data, and since her previously produced data has been shown to be an assortment of lies, fabrications and incompetent errors, she isn't worthy of any attention at all. I'm ready to refute her if she comes up with anything new, but there isn't any point in sorting her garbage: it will still be garbage even after it's sorted.
The QEG people have raised my ire, now that Wayne Travis has also faded back into the dusty red lowlands of southern Oklahoma.
Meanwhile I'm still working on my own interests: For example I have a reedswitched pulse motor on my bench right now that "works" at under 0.1 volt input, wayy less than one milliWatt, and it's not a tiny leeeetle water-generator thingy either. And when it's fed with an entire full One Volt, it makes enough spike voltage to flash a NE-2 neon.
Sorry Tinsel. I saw your name on a long running thread only a few days ago. my assumption was it was still going. I honestly couldn't be bothered reading the crap that she trots out so didn't investigate, Just thought "Oh is that still going on..."
Good luck with your flashy neons I assume you arent trying to claim anything other than a voltage rise of what ~ 300x
QuoteTrolls, skeptics, cynics. negative thinkers your future is lmited.
No.
Being, skeptic is the base to do any (serious) scientific research, that's why we call religious folks "believer". (I have nothing against religions BTW, because there is some good aspect to follow who for example are against moral decay of a civilization and moral relativism).Actually you can't prove or disprove that God exist for example so some people believe that it exist and some other believe that it doesn't exist. This question will be probably never answered.
The GEQ until proven otherwise is not OU, it use just the resonant rise that you can find in every tank circuit with a hight Q (RF engineering).
And using conventional arrangement and phenomena will never give you OU, try to make OU a gasoline engine... I'm skeptical because I educated myself online, so it help me to recognize that something will have chance to be OU or not.
SRM.
Quote from: CuriousChris on June 01, 2014, 04:29:22 AM
Sorry Tinsel. I saw your name on a long running thread only a few days ago. my assumption was it was still going. I honestly couldn't be bothered reading the crap that she trots out so didn't investigate, Just thought "Oh is that still going on..."
Oh, in her warped mind "it" is still going on, meaning her silly "thesis" that isn't even really a thesis. But I am only concerned with data, and she doesn't have any and won't be having any.
Quote
Good luck with your flashy neons I assume you arent trying to claim anything other than a voltage rise of what ~ 300x
Well... let's see.
The flashy neon in this particular device proves that there is spike energy in the system, that I can extract it and demonstrate its reality. That fact and the fact that the motor runs at very low voltages (actually it only fully stops running at around 0.06 volts) together shows that it could probably be used as a testbed or substitute in the Larskro circuit that is presently generating a lot of buzz. And I've shown that ordinary reed relays, which are all over the place and can be had for pennies in the surplus market, can be used just for the reed switch part with external magnets, without involving the rest of the relay, and in addition I hope I've demonstrated what I've told reed-switch users before: putting a tiny ceramic cap across the reed contacts will preserve them and make the reed switch last a lot longer. And I've also demonstrated (with flashy neon) that this capacitor, chosen correctly, doesn't kill the "radiant" or high-voltage spike, it just damps or slows it enough so that the switch contacts don't fry.
As far as using the device to probe the Larskro circuit and claims, so far I can tell you this: there is something wrong with Larskro's claims and I think I know what it is. My apparatus can reproduce the behaviour that Larskro shows, but the switch position doesn't correspond to what he shows. Research continues. (Since I added the tiny cap across the reed, it has given me no more "welding" trouble and has worked reliably at 10,000 RPM range (150-180 Hz) for many minutes and I have taken it briefly to twice that speed, switching 300 mA at that speed if my meters are right.)
And yes, this little puppy can produce spikes of 100x the input voltage, even with its tiny air-core coils. I am not ready to claim 300x yet! I would love to have James Robitaille measure its input and output power....
8)
Quote from: ARMCORTEX on June 01, 2014, 03:59:14 AM
O they have a limited future alright.
Its a good thing that I got my bunker half built by coincidence, and all my gear in the works. Just maybe I'll have time.
Then I'll kiss the profanes goodbye.
hi,
I am curious about bunkers especially those that are built underground.
Especially more curious on how you settle the air inlet if in the worst case the exterior environment air is contaminated eg:radiation,virus.
A simple classic bunker we all know what it's purpose besides trying to survive a Category 5.
Filters
Quote from: TinselKoala on June 01, 2014, 06:33:25 AM
Oh, in her warped mind "it" is still going on, meaning her silly "thesis" that isn't even really a thesis. But I am only concerned with data, and she doesn't have any and won't be having any.Well... let's see.
The flashy neon in this particular device proves that there is spike energy in the system, that I can extract it and demonstrate its reality. That fact and the fact that the motor runs at very low voltages (actually it only fully stops running at around 0.06 volts) together shows that it could probably be used as a testbed or substitute in the Larskro circuit that is presently generating a lot of buzz. And I've shown that ordinary reed relays, which are all over the place and can be had for pennies in the surplus market, can be used just for the reed switch part with external magnets, without involving the rest of the relay, and in addition I hope I've demonstrated what I've told reed-switch users before: putting a tiny ceramic cap across the reed contacts will preserve them and make the reed switch last a lot longer. And I've also demonstrated (with flashy neon) that this capacitor, chosen correctly, doesn't kill the "radiant" or high-voltage spike, it just damps or slows it enough so that the switch contacts don't fry.
As far as using the device to probe the Larskro circuit and claims, so far I can tell you this: there is something wrong with Larskro's claims and I think I know what it is. My apparatus can reproduce the behaviour that Larskro shows, but the switch position doesn't correspond to what he shows. Research continues. (Since I added the tiny cap across the reed, it has given me no more "welding" trouble and has worked reliably at 10,000 RPM range (150-180 Hz) for many minutes and I have taken it briefly to twice that speed, switching 300 mA at that speed if my meters are right.)
And yes, this little puppy can produce spikes of 100x the input voltage, even with its tiny air-core coils. I am not ready to claim 300x yet! I would love to have James Robitaille measure its input and output power....
8)
I was thinking after I wrote the 300x it was a bit much its not required for a neon if I recall 120v was enough for reliable operation.
I remember my father used to have a test tool for checking whether power points were live. it was a small screwdriver with a neon in the translucent handle. simply inserting it into the power socket would tell you if it was live. it used your body as part of the loop. which goes to show the miniscule current it draws.
I haven't looked at the larskro cct so no comments there.
What baffled me when I first came on this forum was people going on about reed switches sparking (arcing) and saying its proof of an unknown energy source. I thought you crazy dimwits (I can be unkind sorry), the only thing it proved was they don't have a clue and their reed switches would die pretty soon.
Your neon possibly acts as a part of the spark suppression cct. the cap absorbs the increasing voltage until the neon breaks down. you *may* find your reed wont last as long without the neon.
You may appreciate this its about a study I read about today.
http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/05/revisiting-why-incompetents-think-theyre-awesome/
Quote from: CuriousChris on June 02, 2014, 05:19:56 AM
You may appreciate this its about a study I read about today.
http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/05/revisiting-why-incompetents-think-theyre-awesome/ (http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/05/revisiting-why-incompetents-think-theyre-awesome/)
Very informative and beneficial. Thanks for providing the link.
Chris said,
QuoteYour neon possibly acts as a part of the spark suppression cct. the cap absorbs the increasing voltage until the neon breaks down. you *may* find your reed wont last as long without the neon.
Maybe. In the demo video, the reed switch was giving problems, sticking, with the larger cap and neon hooked up and the neon firing. When the neon stopped firing I knew that the switch had seized. But since adding the tiny cap, there have been no troubles at all with the reed.
The neon will definitely keep the spike voltage from getting out of hand. But I think the small cap gives just the tiny "softening" of the spike edges so that the switch contacts don't fail.
Does this also kill the "overunity" effect from reeds? Well, since I find no OU and I'm using the little cap.... so it must be. Right?
Quote from: TinlKoa
But I think the small cap gives just the tiny "softening" of the spike edges so that the switch contacts don't fail.
Aye, the Kettering Ignition System included a necessary
capacitor (typically 0.22uF) across the Breaker Points
for similar reasoning. But, nonetheless, tungsten migration
from one contact to the other gradually occurred until one
contact had a cone shaped depression and the other contact
had a conical extension which fit precisely into it (the depression
in the other contact) when the contacts were closed.
Electric Current does amazing things...
Quote from: TinselKoala on June 02, 2014, 04:40:56 PM
Chris said,
Maybe. In the demo video, the reed switch was giving problems, sticking, with the larger cap and neon hooked up and the neon firing. When the neon stopped firing I knew that the switch had seized. But since adding the tiny cap, there have been no troubles at all with the reed.
The neon will definitely keep the spike voltage from getting out of hand. But I think the small cap gives just the tiny "softening" of the spike edges so that the switch contacts don't fail.
Does this also kill the "overunity" effect from reeds? Well, since I find no OU and I'm using the little cap.... so it must be. Right?
Yes that's exactly what the cap does. No matter what type of switch you use when opening a switch to an inductor you need to protect it from the massive voltage spike.
I don't doubt your tiny picofarad ceramic capicitor is totally destroying the overunity effect. Thats why we in the government teach everyone to use capacitors in spark quench circuits. It's really a clever ruse to hide overunity.
I guess these clever people here have discovered our secret. We will have to shut down this forum and arrange for everyone who has ever read it 'have accidents' to protect our control.
These guy's forgot to install a big enough cap
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMbN9nb3qyk
Quote from: CuriousChris on June 03, 2014, 08:20:40 AM
Yes that's exactly what the cap does. No matter what type of switch you use when opening a switch to an inductor you need to protect it from the massive voltage spike.
I don't doubt your tiny picofarad ceramic capicitor is totally destroying the overunity effect. Thats why we in the government teach everyone to use capacitors in spark quench circuits. It's really a clever ruse to hide overunity.
I guess these clever people here have discovered our secret. We will have to shut down this forum and arrange for everyone who has ever read it 'have accidents' to protect our control.
Please do not encourage people to research into negative reactance devices.
Quote from: MarkE on June 03, 2014, 10:34:47 AM
Please do not encourage people to research into negative reactance devices.
I'm sorry Mark, but what do you mean? what is the concern? thanks.
Quote from: Rigel4 on June 03, 2014, 06:53:20 PM
I'm sorry Mark, but what do you mean? what is the concern? thanks.
The concern is for the well being of all.
Quote from: MarkE on June 03, 2014, 09:08:57 PM
The concern is for the well being of all.
Are you speaking of the possibility that this could cause every particle in the universe to explode at the speed of light?
Bill
Quote from: Pirate88179 on June 03, 2014, 10:32:29 PM
Are you speaking of the possibility that this could cause every particle in the universe to explode at the speed of light?
Bill
You might very well believe that. But I could not possibly comment. There are just some things that people should not mess with.
Quote from: CuriousChris on May 31, 2014, 08:23:53 PM
That's only because you can't play this game.
You know that your logic is deficient. You know that any attempt to support overunity results in ridiculous outcomes that are clearly impossible. but rather than give up on your silly beliefs you choose to ignore them. Instead to denigrate those who would point out the lack of reasoning in your thoughts.
Rather than put together a cogent line of reasoning in support of the possibility of OU. You instead go on the attack.
Why don't you stand up for what you believe in, instead of sticking your head in the sand?
As for tinsel I don't know what floats his boat, Very intelligent but he is involved in a multiyear argument with an insane rosemary perhaps he doesn't want the trip to end, personally I don't have that sort of spare time. I can't speak of milehigh.
The challenge stands.
If you believe in OU explain why MEP is not possible and at the same time OU is. Remove the mouse and replace it with ANY source of energy you want if that makes you feel better. a battery perhaps, A small generator, whatever you need. If the math worries you replace 200% with whatever you feel is realistic. 120% 1200% whatever swings your bat it doesn't matter.
Oh and I guess I should speak of my reasoning for being here and taking this rubbish on. diseases need to be attacked. take a look at homeopathy. its a cancer that does no good and is known to do harm. the anti vaccination morons. These are people who with no knowledge and only misinformation, while living with a bubble mentality* put the world at great risk. They don't understand the evil of what they are doing. and overunity frauds they take people away from looking for real and possible solutions and instead feed them false arguments about how evil governments are hiding the truth from them. I am here to protect my children from people like you.
You should be ashamed of being part of that disease.
But you will continue to deny the truth and you will continue to believe in falsehoods. Why? because like the scorpion that's what you are.
*bubble mentality: groups of people who feed information to each other in a closed environment, refusing to look out side the bubble to other explanations and failing to research what they choose to believe. In the bubble, lies quickly become accepted as fact.
nope just won't waste my time with lost causes like you. and from your above mention about vaccines you have gone so far into the stooooopid zone there is no hope for you. i've got way more proof of the dangers of vaccines than you can imagine. you only continue to reinforce how likely you are a paid troll for the PTB.
Quote from: MarkE on June 03, 2014, 10:34:47 AM
Please do not encourage people to research into negative reactance devices.
funny you should post that in such a small font. must be worth checking into. i heard of this guy before but hadn't seen his negative reactance patent. obviously one of the secrets they don't want us to know about. so here it is
I would be careful with negative reactance. I was warned but did not heed, now just this morning I woke up thinking about OU. And the worst thing is I am now just a minion. (and besides minion does not pay well I need to work my way up to disinformation officer, or senior numberlogist or pie cutter.)
/sorry rough day
Quote from: steeltpu on June 09, 2014, 05:48:28 PM
funny you should post that in such a small font. must be worth checking into. i heard of this guy before but hadn't seen his negative reactance patent. obviously one of the secrets they don't want us to know about. so here it is
Proceed at your own risk.