Hi folks,
I did not know where to post this finding on google video. Stefan, please feel free to move it elsewhere.
"Utterly amazing free energy device. This machine consists of just two rods of each slightly different elements, and provides power day and night by completely unknown means." One rod is said to be made of 73 different elements, the other one is said to be made of 74 elements. Hoax ?
Part 1: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-635987818295327978
Part 2: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4298347669641896403
QuoteNutrino circuit consists of two rods about 3 inches long (see the first picture below). The device consists of the two posts, a wooden base, two terminals and a switch. One of the rods consists of 73 elements and the other rod contains 74. The earth is stuck by particles from space all the time called nutrinos. When nutrinos strike one of the rods it causes a negative charge to build up. The second picture to the shows three Christmas tree lights being illuminated by the rods. These rods put out about 18 watts of power. This device has been used to charge batteries in a cave hundreds of feet below the ground.
http://www.innovativetech.us/FutureProd-sp.htm (http://www.innovativetech.us/FutureProd-sp.htm)
*****
Besides they claim having built a PMM ("Sundance Generator") consisting of coils on disks http://www.innovativetech.us/GenFront.htm (http://www.innovativetech.us/GenFront.htm). Pretty odd that they want to use a motor to drive the generator that is said to "produce as much as 40 times more output energy than electricity that is used to power it."
(https://overunityarchives.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg296.imageshack.us%2Fimg296%2F3376%2Fsundanceqw9.jpg&hash=60444a83b8fde4debcec898505e5c78cd5901e43)
!Caution regarding business practice!
Greetz, Pontifex
Hi clever guys
I had collected, a couple of years ago, all the informations I could get about these mysterious "Neutrino Rods". Please see: http://freenrg.fr/JapRod/ (http://freenrg.fr/JapRod/)
Some of the files are in French but most are in English.
Sounds like a Japanese compagny were selling this kinda stuff (though it is not
the ones you can see on the vids).
The file "EnergyReceiver.zip" is from this compagny.
It is in Japanese language, but not the pics :)).
Anyway this document has been translated in English (japtrans.htm).
I had tried to get in touch with this compagny but they do (did?) not speak
English and my phone calls were promply shortened. :))
Best
@pontifex
thankfor the link (2 roads)
that i see 3 years ago in somes www.url?s
also in keelynet it was described and linked.
with many photos . catalogus an pricelists for
the300 watt and 900 watt apparatus (device)
in short time , all was delete , also in archive.org.
The device was made from an japanese company ,
but free energy is not welcome !! .
energy suppliers are interested to sell energy.
the money must go round ! All have "hard" to work
to pay this own needed energie bill?s
This is fact
Pese
P.S.
Jes Nerzh..
this was that , that i was looking for.
(but its modified on 11.Nov2006 - and some
informations and pic?s are now out ..
Keelnet also deleted information ,for
this jap.roads , years ago.
Very interesting , i think not a rubbish,
the altenery.com information , most is not to use.
i folowed this over years
This all seems very interesting.
What does he mean by elements? Which elements? How were these rods made? Could anyone do it? Someone with a few hundred bucks? Few thousand?
Talk about magic, this is interesting indeed.
Hey guys, all those files, research, and english translations on http://freenrg.fr/JapRod ARE FROM MY RESEARCHES in 2003!
It's funny that now people are looking at them again!, lol, all those files were written by me, tao, aka, youhavetoremember.......Anyway, here was a post I did at OVERUNITY.COM just some months ago!
I promised the info on these rod devices before, and now I will deliver.
Below are various messages and even the translated japanese handouts(which I had a japanese friend of mine do for me).
Here is an excerpt from the below info:here is an update from a friend in Japan who has CALLED the company who made the rod-generator:
"Then I called after a long time to ERR Co,.
It seems to change from the rod shape to the film shape, because the
yield of the product(baking of the rod) was bad and it does not
become business.
Now they try to make the film-generator of the same principle.
It has not commercialized yet. The person in the agency seems to be
able to obtain it in the stage of the prototype.
That's all I heard from them. The ERR Co,. is in holiday now. They
seems to be opened from the 18th August." This one from a Japanese man who gave the free energy community a heads up about the Japanese rods.Quote
Hi Oriharu et al!
Thanks for the heads up about the new solar battery generator in Japan!
> $B%*%j%O%k(B wrote:
>
Dear Jerry Decker & KeelyNet.
Hello. This is news in Japa.
Rod-Generator has invented in Japan! It's detailed principle (but
collector of electromagnetic wave) and detailed material (but
it is made of ceramic) is not open yet.
> The news was on "Nikkan Kohgyoh Newspapers" p27, 03/26/2002 in Japan.
>
> Company's name : ERR Co. (They has not Home Page)
> Address : 2-11-18, Tomioka, Kohtoh-ku, Tokyo, Japan
> Phone : 03-3630-1901 (Japan)
> Fax : 03-3630-1905 (Japan)
>
> The appearance is two rods in parallel. One rod is 1cm diameter
> and 10cm long (very small). This "Solar Battery" generates 300W
> (output). They claimed as it is same as Solar Battery. It collect
> electromagnetic wave (light) from infrared to ultraviolet. Perhaps it
> collect energy until X-ray level frequency.
>
> This Generator will sell from June (this year). The system has stabilizer
> and inverter. It's price is 150,000 (300W type). About $1,250.
>
> Near future, 900W type and 5KW type will line up.
>
> That's all detail information. Thank you.
>
>
> from oriharu:
> My page : http://www.bekkoame.ne.jp/~oriharu/
> Free Energy page is : http://www.bekkoame.ne.jp/~oriharu/efe.htm
>
----------------------
While I was looking for this Japanese newspaper, Oriharu sent the following
URL;
http://www.nikkan.co.jp/hln/index_e.html
It shows like the following line but they want bucks to translate to
English;
[9] ISHII HYOKI to begin manufacturing and sales of solar battery wafer
I couldn't find anything else out about this....Thanks Oriharu!
These from and about Don Smith relating to the Japanese rods AND Neutrino VideosQuote
-----Original Message-----
From: Donald Smith [mailto:donsm1@e...]
Sent: Saturday, 10 April 2004 12:07 AM
To: free-energy@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [free-energy] Neutrino rods videos posted
Robin ,
I have business interest in Japan . The first ones I physically had contact with were at a Dennis Lee presentation at Austin Texas 3 years ago . The source is from Patent issued and assigned to the US Government . The Rod business is a decoy to hide the real function , which is a replacement for solar cells . The difference being captures the 24 hour a day radiant energy , and each cell puts out 35 watts of useful energy which is several times that of a solar cell . It's a ceramic material and not difficult to make . An American from NASA quit his job , went to the Philippines , got a Japanese partner and took a Patent there . They opened up business there and sold a very large amount of stock . Yes it works as presented except for the NEUTRINO GIMMICK . Let Me point out that no single cell battery or solar cell can equal this . Not only that , they do not deplete . Several of them together and You are in business . Best Regards , Don Smith
ANDQuote
Whizard wrote:
This is the same device that Don Smith said he built and is having
someone in Japan or China build and market it I believe. There are
not 73 and 74 elements on each of the rods - these are the numbers
from the Periodic table of Elements relating to the two elements used
- which are Tantalum and Tungsten - elements 73 and 74 from the
Periodic table of elements. Very interesting info as I seem to
recall knowing one of the rods was Tungsten but didn't know what the
other one was. It seems to make sense.
Messages about the rodsQuote
I have come across 3 diversely different things over the past
month, diverse in where they come from, not how they function. Allow me to
explain...
I first read about the Tesla's faimed, real or not, test runs with
his cosmic powered electric car in the 30s as was very intrigued as
I am sure anyone who read it was. Anyway, having no other information
concerning the subject no one could really do or say much about it in
terms of how it functioned or how it was made.
Fast forward to last week...
I came across this post to KeelyNet from 2002:
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m12300.html
here are some excerpts:
"Rod-Generator has invented in Japan! It's detailed principle (but
collector of electromagnetic wave) and detailed material (but it is
made of ceramic) is not open yet."
"The appearance is two rods in parallel. One rod is 1cm diameter
and 10cm long (very small). This "Solar Battery" generates 300W
(output). They claimed as it is same as Solar Battery. It collect
electromagnetic wave (light) from infrared to ultraviolet.Perhaps it
collect energy until X-ray level frequency."
etc..etc..
Now, I followed the article to the poster's webpage and came across
a picture, although faint, of the "rod-generator":
http://www.bekkoame.ne.jp/~oriharu/image/rodgene.JPG
this appears to be very similar to the description of the supposed
Tesla cosmic powered device used in the electric car.
Fast forward to yesterday...
I came across a small real video showing a "Neutrino Demo":
http://www.ucsofa.com/videos/nutrino.ram
Watch the video!
In this demo they show a device which looks EXACTLY the same as the
device in the Japanese pic except it's just the bare rods on a wood
board. In the video they state/show, among other things: how he rods
power two different loads, christmas lights, and a 25watt bulb. They
state the device runs on neutrinos and other cosmic rays that constantly bombard the earth. They mention how one rod is composed of
73 elements whereas the other rod is made of 74 elements, the difference of elements causes one rod to be (+) and one to be (-). The small model in this video puts out 18W and is cold to the touch.
Now, they reason I am posting is because I believe the devices built
by all 3 peoples to be highly similar in design and operation. They
all involve 2 rods, one negative, one positive, they both output
steady power with heat buildup, etc...
I felt this to be the best forum to post this on. I feel we can
figure out exactly what is involved in these devices and that we can
bring them out of the underground.
ANY help or information concerning this matter is greatly appreciated!
If you know anything or anyway we can reverse engineer these
devices based on the knowledge presented let us know. As I write this I am
continuing my search to learn more about the potential elements
involved in the rods, how neutrinos and such function, etc.
ANDQuote
The FACTS I now about this "rod" generator are:
1. I have seen 2 distinct PICTURED references to their existance.
Japan and those real video vids.
2. Both devices seem to run on "neutrino power". The Device in the
real video vids is said to runn off the neutrinos and other waves.
The device from Japan is said to run off the infrared<->ultraviolet
spectrums, which is IN the neutrino range
3. Both devices are of the SAME dimensions.
4. The device in the real video vids is said to be made of 73
elements in one rod and 74 in the other. The generator from Japan is
made of a "ceramic" material that is "baked".
5. Both output continuous wattages indefinitely.
6. The "rod-generator" company in Japan's information:
Company's name: ERR Co. (They don't have a website)
Address: 2-11-18, Tomioka, Kohtoh-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Phone: 03-3630-1901 (Japan)
Fax: 03-3630-1905 (Japan)
here is an update from a friend in Japan who has CALLED the company
who made the rod-generator:
"Then I called after a long time to ERR Co,.
It seems to change from the rod shape to the film shape, because the
yield of the product(baking of the rod) was bad and it does not
become business.
Now they try to make the film-generator of the same principle.
It has not commercialized yet. The person in the agency seems to be
able to obtain it in the stage of the prototype.
That's all I heard from them. The ERR Co,. is in holiday now. They
seems to be opened from the 18th August."
Now, if we have two distinct people who have produced these rod
generators that means at least 2 people in the world know how to make
them ;p. Add to that the fact that the company from Japan has made
MANY prototypes and models! in their factories. So all their
employees know how to make them.
If we really dig and reverse engineer this phenomenon we can do it!
Here are the translations of the pages below:(currently only pages 1-5, I can pull up the rest if you guys want them........just let me know)
Quote
Here is the translation from my Japanese friend:
"
OK! I try to translate from the first three.
==============================
1.jpg:
There is a caracter(subject) "A DREAM GENERATOR" on "MARKET".
There is a caracter(company's name) "Gabriel Market Company"
under "MARKET".
================================
2.jpg: There is not Japanese text.
================================
3.jpg:
Concept of New Photoelectromotive Force Technology
Electromagnetic Radiation Receiver
The electromagnetic radiation receiver operates by a similar mechanism to the solar panel. In the solar panel, it has been used all over the world as one energy source, and the mechanism is evidence. The one using a photoelectric effect. Working to which the electron the metal and in the semiconductor is liberated by optical energy and an electromagnetic radiation is called a photoelectric effect.
There are three different phenomena in a photoelectric effect. The photoelectromotive force to an optical discharge and the photoconduction deflecting. Among these, the most important one is a photovoltaic effect. The photoelectromotive force cell is the one that the diode structure of solid-state was built into all aspects on the silicon wafer. The layer on the surface is a structure transparent as light reaches a sandwich silicon joint part very thinly. The photon (photon) is absorbed in the joint part, and the
electron in the atomic uniting part is pulled out. As a result, the free charge of the pair of electron-hole is invented. This free charge moves to both sides in the joint part, improves the charge density, and raises the voltage of the joint part.
The photovoltaic effect completely needs neither the voltage nor the current from the outside compared with the other two effects, and converts the energy of light directly into the electric power. The most general one of the photovoltaic effect is a solar cell. On the other hand, if light mutually hits two insulated silicon wafers, the area where the electron is on the other hand excessive the electron the area insufficient is invented. Differing shape
basically invents the electron as for my electromagnetic radiation receiver by the same reason as the solar cell.
The stem.
If a basic function and the mechanism of the solar panel can be understood, it is easy to understand working of the electromagnetic radiation receiver. However, a point which is greatly different from that of solar is 24 day hours, and the points with sensitivity in which the electromagnetic radiation spectrum from a wide area to the area of infrared rays ,that is, from ultraviolet rays which pours down over the earth the set of the sun later is received. Some 1000 stars which twinkle to night sky.
The all poured and earth Takashi had poured electromagnetic energy of the infrared rays area from ultraviolet rays for the past several billion years. Therefore, the electromagnetic radiation receiver has the function to invent the electron at nighttime. I had searching researched the method of collecting the energy of the electron from a wide area of the electromagnetic radiation spectrum for the past 22 years. The result is a solar energy system of a new type of electromagnetic radiation receiver. The basic mineral used in the electromagnetic radiation receiver behaves as if the charge which moves in the electrical conduction, and plays the role to produce the cloud of a free electron. The energy barrier on the surface confines the electron in the
electromagnetic radiation receiver. However, when the speed toward energy or outside of the electron increases enough, the electron is discharged into the space. This electron calls necessary amount of energy for the space to discharge a work function, and is expressed by the following expression.
E=W
The electron is not discharged into the space, and at largeness, discharged if the energy of Hica (photon) is smaller than that of this value. The energy of the electron at this time uses the expression in Einstein's photoelectric effect.
E=hv=W+1/2mW
It is shown. The amount whose energy of the photon is larger than that of E=W becomes kinetic energy (1/2mW) of the electron. The photon is given all energy and disappears. h is a constant which is basic of a physical law (quantum mechanics).
==========================================
4.jpg:
No basic idea of my electromagnetic radiation receiver (ERR) is new. Nicola Tesra which invents the exchange system calls the free energy receiver in 1901, a similar technology is developed, and the patent is obtained. It has agreed exactly in the point to use the photoelectromotive force though the invention of Tesra is greatly different from today's. The most remarkable difference is a point that today's solar panel is composed of the base of the crystal silicon: Amorphous is used very recently. However, it is thought the free energy receiver that Tesra invented to was the one that the plate of a thin metal was coated with a transparent insulation thing, and spreading today's plastic.
The higher, the more efficiency improves when the panel is put up in the air as well as the antenna. It is connected wires from a part of the panel to a part of the capacitor, and other terminals of the capacitor are grounded. Energy from the sun is charged to the capacitor. The load is connected from the capacitor through the switch circuit, and an electric output is obtained as the capacitor repeats the electrical charge and discharge at a constant cycle. The output obtained by of course the area of the insulation panel large is large.
Tesra tries the explanation how this method to obtain energy is easy. The device of Tesra is more than the solar panel. The reason for it is that energy can be taken out at nighttime when the sun hid the face. The free energy receiver of Tesra is obtaining the patent as "Device using the radiation" in 1901. It is possible to touch about other radiations 1 like not only solar energy but also cosmic rays in that. It is described that the device can actually take out energy by cosmic rays even at nighttime. Tesra touches a huge storing warehouse of negative electricity of the earth, too.
==========================================
5.jpg:
Is an electromagnetic radiation harmful?
It is harmless at all. There is a thing to sometimes wake up people's uneasiness due to the lack of Shitataca to the radiation. Then, the radiation is indicated.
The radiation appears while mediating the interaction between the particle and wave motion. (That is, heat is conducted by the discharge of energy, the spread, absorption, and the radiation. )The radiation changes shape, and carries out various functions in that.
The radiation is discharged from the material, and absorbed to the material. As for the earth, had been done for the past several billion years by the radiation from the sun. Therefore, the skin gets burnt when is under sunshiny for a long time. Everyone is sure to have the experience of sunburning through life once and twice. Still, the radiation has poured down for 24 hours a day. On the other hand, to avoid danger and to adapt oneself, the human race has evolved. Not only the wave of the radiation but also we get corpuscle rain done. However, it is quite safe except the thing that the meteor falls to the head. However, the radiation from the high-voltage line is very dangerous
as cancer and other sicknesses are caused. Model, and it is not a radiation from the sky which causes what harm. It is a radiation to be killing man that man produced.
I think that it was able to understand the basis of the radiation. Then, working of the electromagnetic radiation receiver is described. First of all, let's explain from the word receiver. I want to emphasize the thing like the one receiving it to the end the receiver and no sent one, etc.The solar panel receives the light of the frequency of the visible region, and produces electricity. The energy of the frequency from the brushwood outside line on the both sides to the area of infrared rays is received if not only the area of visible light but also it says in the spectrum and electricity is produced
though the electromagnetic radiation receiver works basically by the same concept as it. It is time when makes to a high voltage with a transformer and uses it in case of there is danger. It makes to high voltage and the high frequency with the transformer and electricity is transmitted to customer's place, and the electric power company drops to the low pressure of 220V and, then, is using it. A high frequency and a high voltage are harmful though 220V is not too dangerous. If an easy test is done, it is understood soon whether a harmful radiation has gone out of the high-tension wire of the electrical machinery and apparatus and the ceiling in your house and office.
In the above-mentioned thing, I think that it canceled the fog of uneasiness of the electromagnetic radiation receiver.
Those who invent it Noazarc research foundation
Doctor of Engineering Ben Shuwalts
==========================================
Peace.................
tao
::)The Electrinium Battery, this is probably it. The japs, naps (napzis, chim-panzis j/k) made a UFO drive using Geminized metal (compound that resembles precious stone and metal fused into one) bricks. Sometime after WW2. The Germans had UFOs before During and After WW2 I think. So did the French. And they didn't kill them selves If they messed up.
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/free-energy/message/11489
Striking the quartz makes sense because those charcoal starters have a spring
mechanism that strikes a very small piece of quartz to produce the 7000V that
ignites the fuel in them. TT Brown wrote about getting electricity from common
rocks by striking them or was it without even striking them, I forget. I'm very
into these developments.
Shang Tsung
Hi all, first post to me. i'm interesting in new ways of produce energy even if i do not know much about electronics, waves, magnetism, etc... i'm just a curious person. Like other i found theses two videos on Google, You tube, etc. It's always like that: when you don't know nothing about theses technologies you say "oh, my godness, it can solve the problems of the world!" But of course is not simple at all. I read many things past days on overunity forums and other web sites. It seems that many of technos of "free energy" are still hidden from the large audience. Maybe it's because "big evils oil groups" don't want to heard about it - but maybe it's just because it's don't work, or work only with precautions operated by technicians ( like we can find here and who, as i see, try to solve some problems with courage ). So, just for information i took a few hours to find some information about this "free energy elemental rod generator". Maybe you have theses informations, maybe not, so i can share it with you.
First at all thanks to TAO from freenrg.fr to put his files onto the net. Without theses files there be no information and the videos still remain like some secret thing without an author.
The videos are the part of a commercial video named "A case for free electricity" of Innovative Technologies Group, LLC who is the dealer of products for UCSA (United Community Services of America) owned by Dennis Lee. The thing is that in this video Dennis Lee present the "rods demonstration" like something secret and he says that he can't give more information about (he tell that with a malicious eye) - he just have a old VHS tape he put on Tv and say nothing more. It's seems like a trick to say "look, it's incredible, i have the holy grail of energy !".
If you read some things about this guy you will know that is very contreversial person.
The entire video can be viewed using Real Player by streaming here: http://ucsofa.com/videos/caseram2.ram (http://ucsofa.com/videos/caseram2.ram)
or directly donwloaded (30MB) here
http://ucsofa.com/videos/case2.rm (http://ucsofa.com/videos/case2.rm).
This video is in the same folder on the net where Tao find the "nutrino demo" video. When you open the "clip info window" of the "nutrino demo" file you see that the real name of the file is "Nutrino Demonstration" and the author is J. Michael Hall. J. Michael Hall is a Texas distributor of Dennis Lee's products. You can read here:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002793694_dennislee08m.html (http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002793694_dennislee08m.html)
a paper where he talk about Dennis Lee.
Well that is for the first source of the video.
I read all the stuff put by Tao on the frenrg site. In the translation of the "energy receiver" document at the end you find this:
"Those who invent it Noazarc research foundation
Doctor of Engineering Ben Shuwalts"
Of course there is a problem with japanese to english translation. If you search for "Ben Shuwalts" on the web you will find nothing. The word "Noazarc" is incomprehensible at first look and you don't find something onto the net.
So i come back to the videos on Google Video ( links on the top of this topic ). By curiosity i start to read the comments. And surprise: A guy named "Bill Lucas" says that he did theses videos but do not post them.
A guy named "BE" said this in one comment (incomplete): " I personally met Dr. Schwartz in 1996 and personally inspected the device. I have 30 years electronics experience. The unit was checked with volt/amp and other meters. I also know Bill Lucas. I also know why the unit hasn't been put on the market." Then another guy "GP" write: "I was there with BE. I touched and handled the device that he is holding. I saw the top, bottom, and sides. I also took measurements on it."
ok, ok...
Well M.Shuwalts is maybe M.Schwartz ?
Take look on the web. After some researches, bingo: "Dr. James B. Schwartz" director of the "Noah's Ark Research Foundation " (Noazarc research foundation in the translation from japanese to english) web site here: http://www.freewebs.com/narfschwartz/ (http://www.freewebs.com/narfschwartz/).
And then look at this link: http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?ei=UTF-8&gid=158642&vid=185051&b=1 (http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?ei=UTF-8&gid=158642&vid=185051&b=1)
The author is : "jbschwartz" (James B. Schwartz)
If you hear his voice and look at his hand you will know that is the guy from the google video.
For the rods, did the japanese put them on market ?
In one comment of google video "BE" says: "I also know why the unit hasn't been put on the market
"
So this is it,
Bye
....Oh, and sorry for my english ! :-)
Nice research, it looks like you found the missing person!
I knew that someday, those translations would come in handy!
Here is a link to the original rods video, parts 1 and 2 combined: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-562337656545887894
I looked at his recent videos again, and this is what Schwartz says about that last generator:
"It?s similar to Tom Bearden?s MEG except that it doesn?t need an external power supply to switch the magnetic fields. It uses a very powerful magnet with a special circuit board that contains a new hi-tech chip to switch the magnetic fields. It also contains ultra-thin graphite sheets called graphene. Using a very sensitive technique, we were able to separate the individual sheets of carbon atoms that are layered on top of one another in graphite. These layers are electrically conducting beca..."(it is cut off from more text for some reason.)
Has he found some way to alter magnetic fields with thin graphite sheets, via small inputs of energy? Or use those thin graphite sheets in some Casimir-ic way?
Interesting stuff.
Then again, it could be a con that has lasted over a decade..... :P
Hi again,
nice to be helpful.
Just in case here are some still images from the original google video and the last yahoo video. This is just to show that between these two videos just two things change: no more clock and the ring on the right hand jump from one finger to another. The same things are: there is one ring for each hand (the same rings ?) and if you see, the position of the two hands in the "left google" image is almost the same that the right hand in the "right yahoo" image.
(https://overunityarchives.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm2.static.flickr.com%2F1108%2F963587526_41f87ca4b2.jpg%3Fv%3D0&hash=e62f28578115aa74c94e716483ceba1e6f5737f8)
"left google" image
(https://overunityarchives.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm2.static.flickr.com%2F1417%2F963587534_9f50933b11.jpg%3Fv%3D0&hash=fdf13a63dd24411c7e74fb16d168e5126cdbf2d3)
"left yahoo" image
(https://overunityarchives.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm2.static.flickr.com%2F1397%2F963587492_4483dd1b76.jpg%3Fv%3D0&hash=0396b929e31aa250d4209b362bfaceb96dde1580)
"right google" image
(https://overunityarchives.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffarm2.static.flickr.com%2F1075%2F963587508_f96b06ec93.jpg%3Fv%3D0&hash=e1246de23c93725eb401cb03cbc72e760ab8c16d)
"right yahoo" image
Another thing: who are "BE", "GP" and "Bill Lucas" ? They post commentaries on one of the google video page...
Another thing more: "Electromagnetic Radiation Receiver" = ERR Co.
Bye
@ Tao,
So after all your research, do you believe this could work? 73,74 are tantalum and tungsten, and he mention that another element is needed to complete it. One thing which made me disbelieve this video, is the fact he rubs his hand over both the rods..and doesn't seem to feel a thing.
Good to have you here Tao, as I've read most of your posts, and you seem to want to help people and bring the free energy movement forward.
Sorry if I'm mistaken but doesn't the man on the video talk about a rod being composed of 73 different elements, with the other rod being composed of 74 elements (supposedly the 73 from the first rod plus one more)?
Quote from: Iosh on July 31, 2007, 02:54:00 PM
Sorry if I'm mistaken but doesn't the man on the video talk about a rod being composed of 73 different elements, with the other rod being composed of 74 elements (supposedly the 73 from the first rod plus one more)?
Yes, he does, 73/74 elements, that are COMPRESSED into the rod shapes.
They are CERAMIC pieces, and are BAKED.
Quote from: Freezer on July 31, 2007, 01:48:30 PM
@ Tao,
So after all your research, do you believe this could work? 73,74 are tantalum and tungsten, and he mention that another element is needed to complete it. One thing which made me disbelieve this video, is the fact he rubs his hand over both the rods..and doesn't seem to feel a thing.
Good to have you here Tao, as I've read most of your posts, and you seem to want to help people and bring the free energy movement forward.
Thanks...
Although it sounds odd to have a mix of 73 to 74 elements, because that really seems like a lot, but that is what I am taking that he is saying. I have thought about the Tungsten and Tantalum also, as being the elements, but the fact that I KNOW from my Japanese contact, that the rods were indeed BAKED, it seems less likely.
I know what you are saying about the rods and him rubbing them, seems very odd that he didn't get hurt, but maybe he didn't fully touch them or the output voltage was really low or something.
I am reserving judgment until I hear back from him.
Just so you all know, I wrote a multi page email to Dr. Schwartz, and I will post any replies...
For those of you wanting to see the original scans of the Japan company Err's brochure for this rod technology, I have posted them below. Dr. Schwartz moved to the Philippines from the USA worked with some Japanese colleages and started the company:
> Company's name : ERR Co. (They has not Home Page)
> Address : 2-11-18, Tomioka, Kohtoh-ku, Tokyo, Japan
> Phone : 03-3630-1901 (Japan)
> Fax : 03-3630-1905 (Japan)
Anyway, the prior post I made on the first page of the thread, those translations are from my Japanese friend and they of translations of the Err's Company's brochure. They are here http://freenrg.fr/JapRod/EnergyReceiver.zip , but I have posted some of them below so they can be SEEN without having to keep going to a zip file...
Look at those lights in the second image, with the black end on them, they are EXACTLY the same as those from that video http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?ei=UTF-8&gid=158642&vid=185051&b=1
This guy REALLY likes briefcases! LOL.
The thing that annoys me most is: Ok, he tried to commercialize these things in Japan, ok, and it didn't seem to work. Now what? If this is REAL, and he has had this stuff for years now, what is he doing what it? The premise of his Noah's Ark Research Foundation (http://www.freewebs.com/narfschwartz/) is "Working To Save Our World", well, if YOU were "Working To Save Our World", and you REALIZED that your WORKING (?) technology could HELP to "Save Our World", and that your COULDN'T COMMERCIALIZE IT, then WHAT is the problem with distributing the exact methods for duplicating these rods all over the internet? Do we have another Steven Mark case on our hands? Inventor being held back by the government? Or is the technology just not viable? Do the rods eventually lose power?
All key questions that need answering.
I'd bet the inventor (or that company, or the investors) want (HEAPS of) money for this.
Thx for the info Tao. If the rods are made of 73/74 different elements, that would make it next to impossible to guess what elements they are. I guess this is another SM device which will be sucked into a blackhole. :P I wonder if this works on the same priciple of Hutchison's crystal battery which he also bakes.
Hi Tao and all,
did you notice the rod looks like magnet stacks. They don't look straight up and down. If this was baked, it should have looked more straight.
Hank
Quote from: tao on July 31, 2007, 03:38:31 PM
Just so you all know, I wrote a multi page email to Dr. Schwartz, and I will post any replies...
Hi Tao,
did you have some feedback from M.Schwartz ?
Quote from: energielibre on August 02, 2007, 02:49:11 AM
Quote from: tao on July 31, 2007, 03:38:31 PM
Just so you all know, I wrote a multi page email to Dr. Schwartz, and I will post any replies...
Hi Tao,
did you have some feedback from M.Schwartz ?
No,
I have received no feedback from him yet.
I will definitely post any when I receive it.
i have looked at this some time ago there has to be a diffranec of negitive restance to make the current flow from 1 rod to the other he says that " they used a circuit like this to charge the ham radio batteries if i remember correctly
also in my work on the tpu i came across somthing that dirrectly relates to the elemenatl rods in an old tube radio book!!
if i find the time i will post the page from the book im sure it had to do with negitive resistance
is
open
http://web.mit.edu/mit_energy/about/committee.html
look down
Co-President James SchwartzÃ, jschwartz [@sloan.mit.edu]
Quote from: caleb on August 02, 2007, 11:45:18 PM
open
http://web.mit.edu/mit_energy/about/committee.html
look down
Co-President James Schwartz jschwartz [@sloan.mit.edu]
That'd be right, just check the sponsors to find out what happened to this technlogy.
Les.
Quote from: lwh on August 03, 2007, 08:42:26 AM
Quote from: caleb on August 02, 2007, 11:45:18 PM
open
http://web.mit.edu/mit_energy/about/committee.html
look down
Co-President James Schwartz jschwartz [@sloan.mit.edu]
That'd be right, just check the sponsors to find out what happened to this technlogy.
Les.
Hey guys, that isn't even the right guy...
I am still awaiting a response from the RIGHT Schwartz from Noah's Ark Research, nothing yet...
Guys, is the involvement of Dennis Lee not enough to tell you all that this is a complete scam? A bit more elaborate than his others, I have to admit.... But Come on... Dennis lee? Dennis Lee is involved. That should be enough for anyone. The guy is a known, scam artist. You have to assume anyone involved with him is too.
By the way, you can light cristmas tree lights with 4 AA batteries. They draw very little current. It's just batteries, positive up on one side, and negative up on the other, in some kind of conductive shell, of graphite, or carbon, or something, perhaps even copper with conductive black paint coating, and wire between them on the bottom. Notice he touches both rods at one point simultaneously, and he doesn't get bit? Or if he does, it's nothing painful.. or even felt.. That should tell you everything you need to know. As for the suitcase thing, who knows. Also there are very low powered gas bulbs that would light very brightly with that much power, I had one connected to a piezo that lit when you shook the piezo, four of them would have easily been lit by batteries in that config. And luminosity is easily misinterpreted by cameras. Those bulbs were not that brightly lit. If you don't believe me, go read about what dave did again. He clearly says they look brighter in the video than they really were.
I'm happy to be proven wrong, but I would bet dollars to donuts there's nothing here.
I fully support the above.
Now, assume that I have a fe device (I don?t). What would be the first thing to do? Let it run. Second? Let it run. And again, and again. Forever! It?s free energy, remember? It?s our dream! Wouldn?t you let the device continuously run, up to its final wearing?
Any show in which the device is quickly shut off is just not natural. It is simply something that no one would do, imho, with a real free energy device. On these grounds, I?m sorry to say but I dismiss most of the claims seen during the last years. A natural movie on a real device would show the device at full power and energizing a load, most of the time. The emphasis has to be on power out and, if not an independent setup, on power in also. Any other emphasis given is not fitting the picture.
Tinu
Yes, I think this is a fake device.
Probably hidden batteries inside these rods...
Quote from: caleb on August 02, 2007, 11:45:18 PM
open
http://web.mit.edu/mit_energy/about/committee.html
look down
Co-President James Schwartz jschwartz [@sloan.mit.edu]
1?
Definitively not the same guy, look at http://web.mit.edu/sloaneef/aboutus.htm (http://web.mit.edu/sloaneef/aboutus.htm)
and you can see his photo.http://web.mit.edu/sloaneef/img/image018.jpg (http://web.mit.edu/sloaneef/img/image018.jpg)
2? About the connection with Dennis Lee i agree. Even if Dennis Lee have no real connection with theses Rods (remember that on his website he just have a still images capture of video, so he might have only the video and use it for his own publicity).
3? I show this video to some people here in France who are involved in new way of use energies, they want to know more about. But, as we know, we don't have informations and confirmation about the real existence of theses rods and M.Schwartz don't talk about. I wait that he show his device for really, some people here in France too. If he don't, so that is a scam.
I most definitely don't believe in the rods either, really.
There is so much evidence that it is just a COMPLETE fake.
But, I still had to send that letter to Schwartz to see if the WOULD reply.
Always the benefit of the doubt.
"Hey guys, that isn't even the right guy...
I am still awaiting a response from the RIGHT Schwartz from Noah's Ark Research, nothing yet..."
Ooops. Sorry for letting my cynicism get the better of me. Sometimes I forget that the lack of evidence both for and against overunity, and suppression of overunity, makes following the subject nothing more, or less, than a form of entertainment. That is to say, sometimes I take it all a bit too seriously and allow myself to be led astray.
But damn, that brochure looks so convincing ;D
Les.
Quote from: lwh on August 04, 2007, 01:44:23 PM
"Hey guys, that isn't even the right guy...
I am still awaiting a response from the RIGHT Schwartz from Noah's Ark Research, nothing yet..."
Ooops. Sorry for letting my cynicism get the better of me. Sometimes I forget that the lack of evidence both for and against overunity, and suppression of overunity, makes following the subject nothing more, or less, than a form of entertainment. That is to say, sometimes I take it all a bit too seriously and allow myself to be led astray.
But damn, that brochure looks so convincing ;D
Les.
It still COULD BE OU, if Schwartz would just contact me and let me know the REAL details of it all.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I think this is a fake device.
Probably hidden batteries inside these rods...
--------------
@harti
Not in the rods the are 2 irons.
can be switched on / of (in short circuits.
In the "milkglas buls , ca be inside 1 battery and one pcs 5-10 watt Halogen-lamp.
If the socket (2 poles) of bulb will be shorted (as an switch)
so that devive will iluminated from inside.
i can make you an sample (80 Euros).
Only for fun! One piece
Gustav Pese
Hi Over_Unity addicts,
I'm refering to this document (in Japanese but with pictures :)) about the mysterious rods: http://freenrg.fr/JapRod/EnergyReceiver.zip (http://freenrg.fr/JapRod/EnergyReceiver.zip)
A couple of years ago I phoned this compagny (GMARKET). Unfortunately they did not speak English and my conversation was promtly shorted. Now, fortuitously, a friend of mine is in communication with a Japanese guy who is spending some months in france for a period of instruction . This guy is ok to phone the compagny. It is a good way to find out if there is somethning or what. Is is not?
When I get the informations I post them here.
BTW: Do you have any question to ask this compagny?
Best
The phone number of this compagny:
(https://overunityarchives.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffreenrg.info%2FImg%2FJapCompagny.jpg&hash=261f5dabbac76c484f7613f80869bef3cb8a2f00)
Quote from: lwh on August 04, 2007, 01:44:23 PM
It still COULD BE OU, if Schwartz would just contact me and let me know the REAL details of it all.
A couple of other places Schwartz may be contacted:
http://profiles.yahoo.com/jbschwartz2002
http://profile.myspace.com/149405807
his myspace hasnt been accessed in over a year.
another technology the "investors" need to protect.
Quote from: NerzhDishual on August 06, 2007, 12:13:33 PM
When I get the informations I post them here.
BTW: Do you have any question to ask this compagny?
So, what's the news?
Did you get any info?
Is that company still in business?
I do have some questions, if you are able to get in touch with that company;
my questions:
1) How much power does the rod device produce (in Watt-hours), and/or what is the maximum output?
2) Does the rod device have a limited "lifespan", in other words does it "run out" or "stop" at any time?
3) Is the rod device effected by temperature, electromagnetic radiation or fields, shocks, etc?
4) Does the rod device work when sealed in a Faraday cage?
5) What is the price of the rod devices?
6) Are the devices still available for sale, and can you ship them to Europe?
Since I haven't heard anything about the rod devices for years now I don't really
expect any positive feedback,
but I would certainly be very happy if I did. ;D
??? :D ;)
http://www.freewebs.com/narfschwartz/projects.htm
@Koen1
QuoteSo, what's the news?
Sounds like I missed your March 06, 2008 message. Sorry.
I usually try to answer any message should it be perceived as perfidiously mocking.
Here
'were' the news: http://freenrg.fr/JapRod/October_2007_Update.html (http://freenrg.fr/JapRod/October_2007_Update.html)
I do my best. Sometimes I'm mislead.
You have the phone number of this Japanese company.
Why not give them a f' buzz?
Have you some Japanese friend? I have not.
I live in an 'average' country in west of France.
BTW: Any Japanese guy over there?
Best
For such an interesting topic, this seems to have gone very quiet.
Has there been any more news/updates ?
Regards Tim
The video seems to be from Dr. James Schwartz
from NoahsArk Research foundation.
He confirmed to me, that it leaked out a few years ago from
his research group.
I have tried to call err co of japan of no availe. Either they are on holiday or they can't speak english. I would do anything to get my hands on one of thoes boxes. If you have any information on these boxes please post on this forum or e -mail me at rayflick3@roadrunner.com.
Same here. If the elemental rod generator is real, I must have it... and oh I will.
I just tried emailing Dr. Schwartz but I have yet to receive a reply.
I know now that the rods do NOT comprise of 73/74 elements because Dr. Schwartz admitted that he a fibbed about the elements to confuse people so that they wont discover how "simple" the rods are made. I don't know what the rods shown in that 1988 video are but the newer Japanese rod generators are made of a ceramic material. The Japanese rods have greater radiant energy absorption characteristics so its the one we want to focus on anyway.
So the mysterious ceramic material is likely a powder that is compressed into a rod shape then bonded together in a kiln and gives the rod a dark matte color.
Tantalum carbide is a ceramic material available as a powder and is (what I think) makes up the first rod. The second rod is in my opinion tungsten carbide (less common as a powder) with a tantalum carbide alloy to give it a more ceramic look. The fact that the two elements are different means the rods can have opposite polarities?
Its likely we can find these materials already in solid rod form but the baking process might be necessary, so its not known if we can cheat this step.
BTW, these materials are among the toughest in the world. This means that these rods can be converted into high-quality drill bits as a secondary function. Breaking them? No way. No how.
There is another thread about these rods. Perhaps merge them together?
I tried IMing Dr. Schwartz on Yahoo messenger because his status was online but no replies. He's either ignoring me or his computer has malware that automatically signs in and out of instant messenger software to spam his contacts via IMs.
Anyway, I don't think we really need his input. I have a very good idea what these ceramic/carbon rods comprise of and I will find out if they are real.
I believe its real because these rods are closely related to carbon nanotubes, which are finding use as solar cell material. In addition, these rods are similar to solar cells except that they absorb a wider band of the electromagnetic spectrum (including UV, visible and infrared). Normal solar cells will reject all other frequencies outside the visible spectrum and convert it to heat energy.
A 13 year-old kid from my state of Oregon (I live here) has figured out how to develop a solar cell with carbon nanotubes, which can generate electricity from both visible and UV light. The elemental rod generator appears to be very closely related.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Yuan
That is one busy boy...
500 TIMES more light absorbtion, and 9 times more than cuting edge 3D solar cells?
Sounds like he might have a solar powered supercar before he's allowed to drive one?
Yeah... I'm not sure about those figures. From what I understand this panel hasn't been independent tested. A very smart boy though.
Anyway, I'm currently looking for Tantalum and Tungsten carbide manufacturers. I found some that will create custom rod dimentions but I fear they will require a minimum order. I just want one rod of each heh.
Furthermore, its just my speculation that the rods are Tantalum and Tungsten carbide. They could very well be some other sort of ceramic material with unknown crystalline elements, something even more likely. Imagine having to pay for hundreds of rods as a minimum order and then they don't work.
test
Xaero_Vincent,
So what is your hypothesis, that the rods produce a differential in potential due to their crystalline structure?
The crystalline structure would then act as an antennae for various parts of the EM Spectrum, and the lattice would polarize (atomically orient) itself as the waves pass through it. Something like magnets but on a different vibrational level?
sorry for my delirium, may be Tantalum (73) & Tungsten (74) ?..