BTW since I was in this thread for so long I figured I'd explain why I'm not right now.

Basically the results I was getting kept on suggesting that I was getting the 'conventional' effect and not the other one whatever that might be, so figured I'd try my enhanced flux coupling ideas in a more pure way but before I got to do that I tripped on a correlation and posted it, Stiffler and Ben/K4zep have made it work and so that's going swimmingly.

But I must say, very nice results Thane!

Well done!  It does all seem to be coming together does it not?

Quote from: aether22 on July 31, 2008, 05:08:53 AM
BTW since I was in this thread for so long I figured I'd explain why I'm not right now.

Basically the results I was getting kept on suggesting that I was getting the 'conventional' effect and not the other one whatever that might be, so figured I'd try my enhanced flux coupling ideas in a more pure way but before I got to do that I tripped on a correlation and posted it, Stiffler and Ben/K4zep have made it work and so that's going swimmingly.

But I must say, very nice results Thane!

Well done!  It does all seem to be coming together does it not?

Thanks A22 and yes I find things usually start to come together around the 10 year mark.

Thane

Does your AC power supply have a current limiter?
Sorry if I annoy you with repeating questions.

Quote from: alan on July 31, 2008, 07:05:35 AM
Does your AC power supply have a current limiter?
Sorry if I annoy you with repeating questions.

IF I DIDN'T ENJOY SHARING AND ANSWERING QUESTIONS, PERHAPS I SHOULDN'T BE HERE.

AND NO WE DON'T HAVE A CURRENT LIMITER AND WOULD NOT USE ONE AT THIS TIME
SINCE PRIMARY CURRENT INCREASE (OR LACK THEREOF) FROM NO LOAD TO ON LOAD IS OUR INDICATION OF SUCCESSFUL FLUX DIVERSION.

CHEERS
Thane

I wrestled this down to < 50 K before I remembered Gyulasun told me I could do 100 now (thanks ).  Next time.