I did find the claim about self runner by Alan. It was on Naudin's website..
http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/francoeu.htm

BTW.. Great work Thane. Perhaps a self running is possible.

  @ Hydro:
    Al has since went silent about it too. Has also made it plain he wont discuss it either. Now why does that not surprise me.

  @ Thane:
   Your last post here was all good to the end words of replacing coal and nuke. Coal they might put up with, but you start trying
to obsolete the nuke power plants and that will cause a flap. Who will pay the closeing tabs?  All the lost monies they cant suck
out of the people. Take Hanford for instance, we the people got to pay for it. Like it or not in rate hikes. All reminds me of the spice
trade in the movie Dune. "He who controls the spice, controls the universe."  Oil and Power companies. Step lightly my friend.

thaelin

Quote from: Thaelin on August 30, 2008, 11:21:17 PM
  @ Hydro:
    Al has since went silent about it too. Has also made it plain he wont discuss it either. Now why does that not surprise me.

  @ Thane:
   Your last post here was all good to the end words of replacing coal and nuke. Coal they might put up with, but you start trying
to obsolete the nuke power plants and that will cause a flap. Who will pay the closeing tabs?  All the lost monies they cant suck
out of the people. Take Hanford for instance, we the people got to pay for it. Like it or not in rate hikes. All reminds me of the spice
trade in the movie Dune. "He who controls the spice, controls the universe."  Oil and Power companies. Step lightly my friend.

thaelin

I THINK IT WAS IN DILIP HIRO'S BOOK, "BLOOD OF THE EARTH THE BATTLE FOR THE WORLD'S VANISHING OIL RESOURCES" HE TALKS ABOUT HOW THERE IS ONLY ABOUT 50 YEARS WORTH OF URANIUM LEFT ANYWAY - AND AS FAR AS COAL IS CONCRENED I IMAGINE CHINA MIGHT BE HAPPY TO SEE THEIR COAL PLANTS GO BYE BYE OR IF NOT THEN PERHAPS 25 - 50% MORE EFFICIENT? WHICH EQUATES TO MORE $ FOR THE OWNERS. AND THAT GOES AS WELL FOR NUKE ENERGY SUPPLIERS.

I AM NOT SILENT - JUST BUSY WE ARE ABOUT 1 MONTH AWAY FROM COMMERCIALIZATION IF ALL GOES WELL.

T

P.S.
DEAR ALL, I HAVE POSTED ALL THIS INFORMATION HERE TO ENSURE THAT IT NEVER GETS LOST - THANKS THANE

We need to remember that Nuke power plants still use steam turbines and conventional electric generators.
The Nuke fuel is only used to heat the water for steam, so an increase in efficiency of the generator unit
would greatly benefit them as well. 
I live in Sarnia, ON. which is a border town with the USA and lately I see a lot of wind generators shipping on the highways here.
The wind generators will benefit greatly from this technology too.
I see a good future for this unit.

Apologies for being so late to the party but is this device an over-unity device or PMM? I just discovered this thread only a few hours ago from reading about overunity projects/experiments.