I chose who I chose very simply because I have seen the comments they have made in other threads, and for the most part, have only given constructive criticism, and not just flat out flung names and tear people down for no reason. Nobody I chose even asked me to see what I was working on.

And as far as the response I have gotten. Everyone who has seen this, has agreed that there is something here. With the exception of Stefan, who was not rude in any way, and stated his opinion that he will follow the beliefs of the physics equations until he see's more proof. I have not gotten any info one way or another from others I was waiting to hear from.

I am planning on making a little better quality video's this weekend to post, as what I have is okay, but by no means are they very good quality. Most of my results and tests have been duplicated now. It is still not an exact blueprint, as it has a long way to go, and can be improved upon in tons of ways. But it is a proof of concept that most of you will be able to run with immediately, and very inexpensively. I hope to see some interesting results from all of you soon as everyone fills in the gaps themselves.

Quote from: captainpecan on November 14, 2008, 05:41:15 PM
I chose who I chose very simply because I have seen the comments they have made in other threads, and for the most part, have only given constructive criticism, and not just flat out flung names and tear people down for no reason. Nobody I chose even asked me to see what I was working on.

And as far as the response I have gotten. Everyone who has seen this, has agreed that there is something here. With the exception of Stefan, who was not rude in any way, and stated his opinion that he will follow the beliefs of the physics equations until he see's more proof. I have not gotten any info one way or another from others I was waiting to hear from.

I am planning on making a little better quality video's this weekend to post, as what I have is okay, but by no means are they very good quality. Most of my results and tests have been duplicated now. It is still not an exact blueprint, as it has a long way to go, and can be improved upon in tons of ways. But it is a proof of concept that most of you will be able to run with immediately, and very inexpensively. I hope to see some interesting results from all of you soon as everyone fills in the gaps themselves.

CP,

Look forward to seeing the video.
Is it ok if others post video of their replication efforts and the result you speak of in the mean time?

Cheers,
Dean

Thank you to all who have worked with me, given opinions, and respected my wish to prove my concepts better before releasing.

Here we go guys!  I give you "The Young Effect".
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6090.0

Thanks Captainpiecan, I'll go watch it right now!

(& never mind that Broli or the other naggers.)

Quote from: captainpecan on October 17, 2008, 12:35:18 AM
I think I have figured out an extremely easy way to harness free energy. Very easy to duplicate. I have a prototype that has proven my concept, yet it is so damn small, due to lack of materials and money, I am not confident with my tests to actually claim it truely works, or that it will even work any period of time yet.

BUT... While I'm scrounging up materials, to finish this, I would really like to know the proper steps to get this thing out there. Can anyone explain the GPL to me better, and how I go about getting it? I thought the GPL was only for software, and not think you could use it for a free energy generator? I'm sure I'm wrong, but I simply dont know anything about it, and I want to start taking the steps to getting this thing protected for everyone.

Also, with a GPL, can it be set, so that it is free for everyones personal use, but if a company builds it for profit, a small percentage would have to be paid to the owner? Would that violate the overunity prize adding that into the liscense? 

Also, I have heard that the U.S. Government has thousands of patents for free energy devices, hidden. I'll be honest, this is simple as hell, and I would be shocked if nobody has ever done this before. What happens if I apply for a GPL, and a patent was already issued, for one tiny piece of it, and hidden? The whole damn thing would become illegal to produce wouldn't it?

Anyway, I just need a little help from someone who may have already gotten a GPL before, and knows what's required. I dont have much money, and honestly I'm a bit scared to give any details of what I'm working on for fear someone will patent it that can afford to, and screw me, and everyone else here, by not releasing the info.

So what do I do? Hell, maybe I'll find out like everyone else always does that something has been overlooked and my multimeter is not reliable, or whatever. But the fact is, assume I did, or any one of us did it. What the hell do we do then?
   

Post all info about your idea on this internet website.  NOTE: "After you make a WORKING model". Then if anyone has a patent on it they will be contacting you asap.   You wont have to search the patent office at all.to find a similar device.

The next thing that will happen is a lot of greedy folks will make a run on the patent office to see if they can patent your device ahead of you.

This is where the fun if you call it that comes in.  They might succeed but remember that anything you post on this site is dated and on the patent form the date the (bogus) nventor claimed (your) invention is also shown.

After he spent a fortune patenting (your) device you could legally show the patent office that it was your dated idea posted first on the internet for all to see and the fellow who claimed he was the inventor falsified his patent form.  Money wasted on his part

To head all that off you could also go for a cheap "Patent Pending" and have a years grace to market your invention before you apply for a real patent.

Tom