Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 79 Guests are viewing this topic.


hartiberlin

Quote from: bolt on July 11, 2009, 03:50:07 PM


As i explained just a couple of post back "Power is proportional down the square of stress."  This is where huge power comes from the ambient in these systems. Its all just requoted above and explains how hundreds of kilowatts can be taken from what appear to be a very inferior coil or indeed wiring to handle such power. In conventional circuits you would require an inch thick cable.



Well, Bolt,
but so, how do you extract then these power levels ?

Just via diodes charging up capacitors and then use these DC charged up
capacitors ?
Or how are you going to extract this power ?

If you draw 50 KWatts from a charged up capacitor bank for
a longer times, you surely need inch thick cables, cause we
have resistive heating due to high currents or otherwise you
would need room temperature superconductors...
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

oscar

Quote from: xenomorphlabs on July 10, 2009, 08:50:41 AM
...Is there any publications or experiments with current measurements that have concrete data to support what Oscar is talking about concering the spark gap current ampilfication ? It sure sound interesting and hopefully Oscar will experiment with it.

Hi xenomorphlabs, thanks for your feedback to my posting.
Unfortunatelly I can not point you to such a publication and I have not made any measurements myself.
I once had come accross an old "physics book" which explained the particularities of sparks and discharges .....
When I have something substantial I will post it.

Quote from: bolt on July 11, 2009, 01:15:36 PM
.....The published circuit with 2 earth points and coils shown above the post is close but its not quite correct and wont work as shown.  ....

Hi bolt,
I could not find that circuit you mention.
Could you please give the number of the posting which containes that circuit or a link to it?

and a second question:
If I understand you correctly a "ground differential resonance induction amplifier" has a lower resonace frequency than an "air differential resonance induction amplifier".
Can you explain why this difference in frequencies?

Thanks
The transmission was a '53 (Johnny Cash)

kukulcangod

Pirate
             On Jean louis Naudin's website there is plenty of data available from his experiments with this conical type of coil

Best Regards

bolt

message 293 Its closest to the circuit here but the virgin one without false comments and ideas stuck on it which are wrong. The original is from Russian forum on this project.

Difference in frequency due to the factor electrons move slower through the earth ground magnetic fields thus a low frequency is required to pull free electrons from the earth. As frequency is increased to VHF the ground becomes less important alike normal radio where Long Wave radio transmissions are basically ground waves with wavelengths of many thousands kilometers.  At 27 meg wavelength is 11 meters.

So a VHF radiant energy ambient extractor will excite only local air bound electrons and a ground connection is no longer required. AKA TPU and others. However, for home construction alike transmitters and receiver circuits stability, and build quality becomes critical at higher frequencies.  Its very easy to get things oscillating down in the kilohertz range using a simple spark gap and car ignition coil. The Georgian inventor Kapanadze you can see he is not flush with 50k+ worth of lab gear and built whatever he could do with parts on hand.

Here is the big secret held tight for over 100 years. You are told the electrons you pay for from your electricity company to run your lights come from the generator to your house. WRONG!  The electrons that do the work in YOUR house are YOUR electrons not the power companies. You are paying for them to move your own electrons!  You can move your own from the ground, air and space for almost nothing! When you understand this then everything about Radiant Energy is piss easy. AND its only takes volts and frequency to move electrons. Every time you double the voltage you increase power by a factor of 4 not 2 AND the amount of joules per second increases with higher frequency. This is why Kapanadze is actually a very very low powered device compared to the many hundreds of kilowatts available on compact VHF systems.

Everyone with mainstream hat on chases electrical flux. If you do NOT want to suffer entropy losses then you target magnetic flux which does NOT suffer entropy losses but is a squared copy!! This in essence is a AIR coil not  metal core transformers used by mainstream. The TPU is air cored and SM told you already it works something like  radio pulling free electrons and he is absolutely correct.

Given the simplicity of this then there is no way the TPU has not been replicated its just that the new inventors are so stunned by such simplicity they are keep it for themselves.

[/quote]
Hi bolt,
I could not find that circuit you mention.
Could you please give the number of the posting which containes that circuit or a link to it?

and a second question:
If I understand you correctly a "ground differential resonance induction amplifier" has a lower resonace frequency than an "air differential resonance induction amplifier".
Can you explain why this difference in frequencies?

Thanks
[/quote]