Quote from: robbie47 on September 04, 2009, 06:21:02 AM
@ Ali,
Can you indicate how we can contribute any further to your technology in this forum?

I have the impression you do not want to reveal anymore details than you already did.
If that is the case it maybe useful to close this discussion thread and move on.

Right on robbie47. Inventor made it clear in several posts how he wants to share this and help humanity... Turned out not to be the case... When asked - no blueprints no software. Why he is here for then?..

Minde

I think you are a bit harsh on ALi,
i am sure in his own good time the project will help humanity. why does he have to share it with you at this stage.
So you try and make him feel guilty. There are many ways thsi project can help humanity but in the first intance he might need to  look after his own family and needs
Just my thoughts
mark

I have to agree with Mark.

Besides looking out for the intellectual property angle, there is the issue that this is still very much in its alpha stages and verification of the phenomenon using DC as opposed to AC for good measurement analysis has not yet been done.

I can sympathize with winsonali not wanting to state that this is a proven technology or release more details until it has been proven. There have been many grandiose claims made at on time or another on OU that have been proven to be misinterpretation of measurement results, a misunderstanding of physics, or an outright scam and the posters of these claims are not treated the most kindly after such a discovery.
Double and triple checking personal results (with the good recommendations already posted in this thread) before allowing replication information to be posted might be wise.

That said, I can understand the wishes of the open source FE community to know more specifics about the device as the theme of the site is open source and winsonali should understand that the request for additional data about the device is not going to stop.

Sharing the design info of the device and the software after successful retesting would be a good thing for replicating the effect and validating the claim though. It's even led to design improvements at times.

I will tell you where I am after combining all discussions in this thread.
The attached circuit is able to multiply the input voltage to any desired level after the right switch sequence is applied and ignoring 'old school' theories on currents and charges. The big question is where does the increased current come from. Is it the 'siphon' effect?

[edit] actually SW2 can be left out or closed during the whole switch sequence

just another thought,
Ali was invited here as our guest. I am not sure where you have the right to demand his IP at this stage. We were hoping he would share some information. Is this how you treat guests, invite them in to your house then hold a gun at their head? When some one is invited as guest at a club or conference that does not mean they then have to share everything with you.
I think this is quiet sick and you owe Ali and appology. You are to say the least disprespectful.
I would suggest Stephan or whoever invited him here to appologise on OU.coms behalf and take some sort of disiplinary action.
You are sick, very sick and I have recommended to Ali not to post here anymore.
I am also considering the future of my input. Some of you are very selfish to the extreme and pretend your here for humanatarian purposes and just want to line you own pockets.
Sham Shame Shame.
Without Regards
Mark