Been a bit busy still unpacking and sorting my stuff.
Here is a vid of the igniter inductor working as and orbo drive without the large coils in place, but still in circuit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2MwBg33D80

Mags

The vid took a bit long to process, YT and its new way kinda sucks.  But the vid is finished processing now

Mags

Did a vid last night of the igniter pulse motor and I show the circuit on the sim prog. Some had asked me to show a circuit of it, and it is possible that without explanation, the pat. may be confusing for some at yt.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7KAjf00abw

Mags

Quote from: Magluvin on May 04, 2010, 09:36:51 PM
The Tesla quote above, I had found while looking at some things Delboy had posted on the Magnifying Transmitter thread the other day, but this was on the previous pages to what he had posted.
But I thought about it today. Is there an advantage to having a primary coil of a few turns of stout wire? Could it be that the oscillations in the primary and the cap are not killed off as easily as a hundred or more turns of another primary that are commonly used? Why else would Tesla do it this way?

Maybe the stout primary is of so little resistance and the caps instantaneous discharge into that resistance, the amount of wattage at that moment would be staggering.  But would that wattage in the amount of time that it existed, be more than the wattage and the amount of time to charge the cap for discharge?
Mags

Hello Mags,
you are missing one important thing, and that is SECONDARY SHOULD NOT BE LOADED !!! (DIRECTLY = BY TWO WIRES). Tesla showed how should it be connected. Don't worry about primary(NO OVERUNITY), it should be few turns of wire because you want high energy pulses(high current), and that pulses are transfered to secondary where resonant effect is magnifying them. There is huge energy rise, because it is accumulated, and it is oscillating free(BIG REACTIVE EVERGY OSCILLATIONS OF HIGH VOLTAGE AND HIGH FREQUENCY), it is not consumed by DIRECT receiver and then you pick it up by receivers as Tesla suggested, as much you wish. (THERE IS BIG OVERUNITY BECAUSE INDIRECT CONNECTION OF RECEIVER WITH SOURCE) PLEASE TRY TO UNDERSTAND THIS !

Thanks. Delboy

Quote from: bboj on May 06, 2010, 03:34:05 AM
Ithink the problem is how to take out this magnified energy without killing the oscilation. That is  - can we pump the second condenser to a much higher value and discharge it into some device.
I thin Tito talks about multiple stages, so somehow he is extracting energy without inductive connections between stages.
It is not overunity - which does not exist. In a way it is a kind of electric leverage.
We are talking about work in and work out.

My last post answers this question also "how to take out this magnified energy without killing the oscilation".
To all of you!
Please read Tesla's patents on his receivers (pat 685955 and pat 787412) and try to understand how they work.
Try to understand next thing. RLC in resonance is accumulating energy to some max level depending on how big Q factor is. Isn't this true? If you have calculated P, then Xl or Xc in resonance is X=Xl=Xc=Q*P (VAr) and we call it reactive power, that are basics. Tesla used this on bigger scale, changed it in open RLC circuit, optimised it (spiral form of coil) and instead one wire used Earth itself. By not disturbing resonance and picking up energy longitudinaly, he converted VAr to W ! That is explanation of Teslas overunity.
If you do not belive in longitudinal receiver, how could his bulb light in short circuit like on picture 183c?