@otto

You are very right, I know but my EE level is so shitty that I need this FG to find the effects. If I had to do it all with caps and resistors it would take too much time and I would not be able to do as much testing. My main orientation is to find the coils that produce the effects that are additive. This means an effect that produces an output with low input and where that same effect is present as the low input is increased. If an effect is only present at 30 volts feed, then for me it is not right unless there is a first stage to bring it up to 30 volts. It has to start with like 3 volts with a good output enough to then loop it back to make it increase the input hence increase the output again. I have seen so many effects but they either work at a given feed voltage and quickly disappears with added voltage. It has to have a wider bandwidth otherwise during a voltage rise the capacitance/resonance changes the frequency somewhat and the effect dies again. Then finally it has to accumulate some amperage potential.

SM says the device "runs with gain", not with running shoes. So we are shuffling many parts of the puzzle, trying to make them fit because it is only when all the pieces are together that such a "portable" device will work. It will either work or not. There is no half work and half not.

Once I am ready with enough accumulated data on these and decide to set some operating parameters and frequency range, I will need help to calculate the pulse capacitor/mosfet relation to my chosen coil impedances since I will need to then pulse these without the power supply or FG, in order to start working out a return loop system.

Also, if you would like, you can PM me a list of items that you need along with your mailing address or postal box and I will see what I can do to send you these and more. I am always so sad to hear you have trouble accessing what you need. So please do not feel like you are imposing. If I can help I will be glad to do so.

@Otto,
You are correct about using 555s. You and Bolt both said to use batteries also. I have been doing both for a very long time.

@all,
Now here is a fact that you all need to know. When you use a plugged in device you are essentially creating a Radiant energy sink! The measurement device will never see the process because the ground acts as a byass channel.
Now with that said you then have a battery operated floating device and the created field then impinges upon the circuit in the center. We want to use the field and all activiy as feedback. The feedback is not a loop just in the circuit but the whole floating device bounces up and down in the environment(can you say 'Vibration'). I showed this with my copper and steel coils before. That whole build used batteries, 555s, coils at 90 degrees to each other and was floating. 555s chatter. This adds to the feedback and guess what? It is very high speed and very low conduction. Why low conduction? Because the circuit is already turned on and the chatter really doesn't add to the current draw.
Why was it not reproducable by others? Plugged in devices is the answer.

No mass circuitry also includes testing devices. Recall the volt meter and clamp meter are all floating with the device and the operation during SMs videos.

I will post my new coil tonight. It is a single line of iron wire in parallel with 2.7 turns of tinned stranded 16awg. Then 22awg tinned stranded in 3 concentric layers all the way around and a floating ground line around the outside. All circuitry will sit in the middle. Battery operated, n/p fet pair push pull driving a irf840 on each channel for 3 frequencies. Similar to what Marco had posted before. The windings represent 3 fields all going clock wise one inside another. This field activity is picked up by the iron loop and relayed magnetically to the stranded core at the same time the field activity is hitting the stranded field at 90 degrees. Electrostatic?


@wattsup,
build a 555 ckt. SM said 5khz.


The St.Clair patent is so much easier with a stun gun, 2 coils of different circumferences on same horizontal plane, iron cores. Place another wire loop at 2/3rds radius and use it to read.

Hello all,

@wattsup

1. coils made with tinned wires
2. a phi relation between the "primary" and "secondary"
3. no high voltage is needed
4. on the output of the oscillator is a pair of complementary JFETs driving a MOSFET and this for all of our 3 oscillators


You mentioned low input.....runs with gain...dont complicate...just use  tinned wires and a radio near your coils so  you can hear when you blow yourself.

Thanks for your offer. Its sooooo frustrating when you cant buy even oridinary PNP transistors without ordering them in Germany and waiting for them at least 3 weeks.

But,on the other hand I have here you and GK so I hope you can do the job.

Otto

  GK and All:
   Thank you for that very informative explanation on the test instruments creating a EM sink hole... Could of been what happened in Guatemala... poor guy.
   About the Vector Potential:
   http://search.yahoo.com/search?ei=UTF-8&type=867034&fr=greentree_ff1&p=vector+potential&SpellState=n-632381304_q-zp0JXi0nzqWedKu.JFgW4AAAAA%40%40&fr2=sp-qrw-corr-top
                         NZ
   
   

Quote from: otto on June 11, 2010, 02:08:25 AM
Hello all,

a time ago I posted that you dont have to connect your scope probe to a TPU to see the signals.

Now I say that its totally WRONG to use profi made function or signal generators Square wave generators) because their outputs are useless. Useless for our TPUs.
I never saw the inside from such a generator but Im for 100% sure that they cant deliver signals like we need to pulse a TPU.

So, in short, you have to build your square wave generator. Home made is the best.

A 555 is sooooo a nice IC!! And cheap.

Otto

Hi otto,  I intend to try using signal generators initially since I can vary the frequency and so on until I get close to something that indicates I'm getting some extra power.  I understand it's important to have or build standalone battery powered signal generators (like 555 based) but until I know exactly what signal I want it would seem easier to use a professional fuction generator (although my last one only cost $20 hardly more than putting together a standalone circuit).  Can you say why these would not work as both put out a square wave? 
Ooops!  If I had read a little further I see GK has answered my question.  I think that's the first time I had it explained that well.  I've got a bunch of inverters.  I wonder if I couldn't run my function generators off batteries with inverters (got a lot of 12 volt car batteries too).  I think that would mostly isolate it.  OTOH if I could just find my 555's I've got somewhere...