Quote from: DrKCostas on July 15, 2010, 06:47:22 AM
Here is the link of another case of ""overunity" or "free energy" process developped in Rowan University
The link of the youtube video about blacklight power is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v­=DfjOIoPwolg
It was discovered and elaborated inside Rowan University. Still, the standard academic science does not have the slightest idea where the additional energy, in the energy balance of this process , comes from.
Since it is validated by Universities , there is not the danger of accusations of being a fraud etc. And since it is highly unlikely that it is already a military classified technology, there does not seem to be a fatal obstruction in developing it. The only real difficulty is the conceptual inadequacy of the present physics.

This youtube link does not work. Can you post a valid one? Thanks.

Here is the same video (but only 60% of it) in my channel at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZhH1rrD5YY



I tried it and the link works in youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfjOIoPwolg
by ifreed0m 

and some CNN news about it at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ymlc8nk7Mdk

also at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yHfSE28PeoQ&feature=related
Good luck!

While I studied BLP processes with some interest, I have a problem
with their experimental efforts. Their experiments are not elegant
in that they always seem to be on the lookout for the next unknown
experimental effect. “Always having an Out” is ok when driving a
motor vehicle, but experimental science is not only supposed to show
what happens,
but simultaneously strategically demonstrate what is NOT happening.
Being always on the lookout for the next strange experimental effect
undermines BLP’s efforts and damages it's credibility.

For example, one way for crystals to store energy is by the Wigner Nuclear
Effect Storing energy in dislocations in the crystal lattice. Historically this
effect once put a British weapons reactor out of control. Prove that what
you are seeing is not Wigner energy, in other words prestored
preconditioned energy.

The next thing they need to prove is whether or not CF cold fusion
exists. Because CF excess process energy will sit smack in the middle
of their claims. CF is not currently explained by scientists by using a
BLP physics model.

BLP can spend their money in any way they want and run anything they
want up the flagpole, but without valid evidence, I still ain’t saluting.

:S:MarkSCoffman

I watched recently some videos in the famous site www.ted.com that show how present time innovative, talented and famous people think about the future changes in the energy model. I recommend some of them 
1) Bill Gates approach:
http://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates.html
I think quite conventional and sadly resorts to nuclear power again

2) Al Gore's (Nobel prize winner)
http://www.ted.com/talks/al_gore_warns_on_latest_climate_trends.html
Powerful way to urge.
3) Thermal solar device of small size. 
http://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gross_on_new_energy.html
Brilliant! I wish such computer optimisation could be done to some other amateur "free energy" devices as well.
4) Interesting perspectives of how to win the oil-end game:
http://www.ted.com/talks/amory_lovins_on_winning_the_oil_endgame.html
5) Simplistic conventional forecast of the energy uses till 2050:
http://www.ted.com/talks/richard_sears_planning_for_the_end_of_oil.html
6) Sad debate where nuclear power wins over renewable energies:
http://www.ted.com/talks/debate_does_the_world_need_nuclear_energy.html

And what I noticed is that nowhere is mentioned the plenty many "free energy" innovations found in the web.
So I wrote a letter to Bill Gates pointing out to him, the present situation of "free energy” or “overunity” devices. I suggested to him to do something e.g. fund an institution where Universities, innovators, and investors could cooperate.
I also wrote a similar letter to Chris Anderson that runs the www.ted.com  , as the perspective of energy innovations of “free energy” devices is an idea worth spreading. It contains seeds for valuable development in  theoretical science, engineering, and business, fo good resolutions of the global climate crisis, and CO2 emissions.
I did not expect any response of course.

ted.com... ever follow the money? you know, cui bono?

the 4th largest offender in pollution, general electric, is the biggest funder of ted.com... actually it's pretty interesting to see who is on that 'list'...