I respectively disagree.

Hooking up a large Capacitor (330 uf in a camera circuit)
                            for a short period to a low voltage source (a 1.5 V battery)
                                                                is akin to short circuiting the voltage source.

10,000 is a LARGE amplification not to be discarded lightly.
Remember that the camera circuit must overcome the impedance of a large coil.--- Many many times in 1 second.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Look... Pirate, you have never weighed in on the fact that I claim
                                                            a regular Speaker is technically an OU device.

This is why...

  1. A speaker uses a dynamic/changing magnetic field to do it's thing.

      2. IT TAKES ENERGY TO SET UP A DYNAMIC MAGNETIC SYSTEM.

        3.This energy can calculated by doing 2 things to a speaker.
           a Remove the Ferromagntic material from the coil (that moves the cone).. leaving just the coil.
             b.Replace the Magnet with Coil.

            4. You will realize at this point... that this modified speaker will work...
                 It will just take WAY MORE ENERGY energy to run,
                     compared with the regular setup that uses Ferromagnetics (which possess Unpaired electron Spin)

               5. (Modified Speaker Energy) - (Regular Speaker Energy) = Energy supplied by the unpaired electrons.

The fact that a piece of iron magnifies the magnetic field of a coil 5,000 times is more than interesting.

Pirate.. do you see what I am saying about the speaker...

            True Conservation of Energy means Acknowledging ALL of the Energy in a Given System.

Best Regards,
                     The Observer

In your speaker example, if I understand it correctly which I might not, you are not accounting for the energy in the permanent magnet...is this not correct?

Simple example...if I wind a coil around a nail and make and electro magnet, it will pick-up iron particles right?

Now, if I hold a permanent magnet over the particles, they too get picked up with no energy input like we had to use with the nail.  This does not mean that the PM is overunity at all.  I think it is more like comparing apples and oranges.....

Unless I am missing something which, like I said, is entirely possible.

I can charge a large cap from my flash circuits in just a few seconds, much larger caps than 330 uf, I am talking about 10 farad up to 650 farad.  Just a few seconds is all it needs.

But, if I compare my AA battery after I loaded those large caps, it has been drained quite a bit.  I just took more energy out of it faster, but the energy is the same.

I hope this makes sense.

Bill

@The Observer

So why dont you take a cap instead of a batery and charge it to 1.5VDC and try your experiment again. In this case you will the same amount of energy to begin with for both cases. You will find out what Bill is saying.

Also I bought a pair of Infinity 6x9 speakers containing NO magnets 5 years ago. I have never seen magnetless speaker before untill I opened the box. Was kind of dissapointed for a moment.. I also tought they should definately be weaker than ones with permanent magnet. But I was wrong. They kicked really well... just like they had a magnet on... never noticed any difference. I still have them in my box.

Minde

Leading-out sound energy from the surrounding at resonance

Watch the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiHOqMOJTH4

Focus on the fact that tuning fork on LHS (A) picked up energy from the tuning fork on the RHS (B).  If we put another tuning fork on the LHS of A (call it C), will C pick up energy as well?

The question is: does the energy of all the tuning forks come from the original striking of the tuning fork B?  Is there any possibility of energy coming from the surrounding?

When tuning fork B was stopped, the remaining tuning forks still produce sound.  Where does such energy come from?  Is the simple explanation that they were just the stored energy from the original striking of the tuning fork B reasonable and scientifically indisputable?

FLEET (Forever Lead-out Electromagnetic Energy Transformer) uses the matching of LCR circuits (or resonance hunting) to get more energy from the surrounding.  I believe that electron motion energy of the surrounding material can be lead-out (or bought in) into the system.  The exponential rise in amplitude at or near resonance can be explained by feedback and external energy coming into the system.

If energy can come from the surrounding environment, there will be no violation of the Law of Conservation of Energy.  No Physical Laws have been broken.  That is the beauty of Lead-out energy!

*** I did another gadgetmail type toroid (11 turns JT and 22 turns transformer) on a taller 1 inch ferrite toroid.  The result is not as good as the original.  It is still overunity with COP = 3 (peak-to-peak).  Shall buy a few dozen of the original for the workshops in both Hong Kong and USA.

lol @ the guy in the video when he says " look, theyre not connected at all....see..theyre sitting on this base here with rubber feet"...

errr........not "connected at all"......by virtue of sitting on the same same table as the other tuning fork..and by virtue of being present in the same medium (the air)........then.....they are most definitely.....connected!

having said that.....i appreciate the guys enthusiasm