@observer

My issue is that you mix both of them together as one , they are similar but should be considered separately to be used properly .

Ferromagnetic resonance is a nuclear reaction inside of the iron that transform Fe isotope 54 into isotope 56 , one being a magnetic one energy is liberated by it .
This can be do at any freq ...

Sympathetic vibration , applied on to a ferromagnetic resonance material will lead to a avalanche of electron , that could lead to OU .

Understanding sympathetic  vibration will help for better transfer of energy , the wireless system will permit greater distances at lower energy cost . Not unlike radio systems only better . 

I am not saying that you are wrong but have a way of mixing bot , maybe because you did not explain your self clearly enough . My observation was that over simplifying your explanation made you look like you talk without knowing much , resonance is real important i agree , but unless really understood it is useless , plus its a a good word to trow around at every sauce .


If i conclude that both are the same i will never get anything out of it .

MK,

I mix FerroMagnetics and Resonance as if they are one?

Jee Wiz Wally.. I really don't know how I could be any clearer than
                        saying I am am not talking about FerroMagnetic Resonance
                        and labeling the phenomena separately as 1 and 2.

Quote from: The Observer on November 17, 2010, 11:08:03 AM

MK1,

FerroMagnetic Resonance is not Resonance?    OK

                      Well, I was not talking about Ferromagnetic Resonance.
        I am talking about 2 different USEs (Unrecognized Sources of Energy)
                           .. you put my two buzz words together
                               to formulate a false assumption
                                  as to what I am talking about.

1. Ferromagnetics ... unpaired free electron spiin produces a freee magnetic field that can be utilized.

2. The phenomenon that  Resonating objects Store and emit/radiate Energy based on the amount of energy stored.

I am talking about Resonating an (well many )Ignition Coil Transformers.
It's Resonant Frequency has to do with the dimensions of the Transformer.
I would agree that playing with Ferro Resonance would be interesting,
  however..  that is not what I am doing when I resonate a Transformer.

How bout your input on where the magic lies in an impressive Joule Thief ?

I say you need either a   Ferro Core        or to Resonate the Transformer       or both.
Everytime I say this.. someone says that I'm wrong.. air core will work.
I then clearly ask.. ARE YOU RESONATING THE AIR CORE TO ACCOMPLISH THE FEAT ?

                                To which I have NOT gotten an answer thus far.
                                                          WTF.

So, to the best of your knowledge... are there any impressive JTs (light CFL long time)
                                                                                                                                  that use an air core but NOT resonance ?

Best Regards,
                     The Observer

@observer

Look at the definition one phenomenon is physic and the other acoustic ...

You are not helping your self or other there ...

@ChrisC

QuoteYou may have to wait until the cows come home. Just look at this history of this and previous Tseung threads. A little knowledge can be a very embarrassing thing, even though the author is so delusional he just doesn't get it.

If you look at history you will find some of the greatest inventions happened completely by accident while the inventor was investigating something entirely different. As such even though the people here may not have the required knowledge and may very well be delusional at least they are making an effort and that increases their odds of success by magnitudes compared to let's say someone like yourself who has probably never tried anything. Consider the lottery, the odds of winning are astronomical and yet "someone" wins every single week and they won  simply because they tried, they bought a ticket, increasing their odds by magnitudes compared to someone who did not. It should be obvious that nobody will ever win a lottery if they have no ticket and nobody will ever succeed at anything unless they actually try.
Personally, I have always learned the most valuable lessons and gained the most knowledge when I have jumped into something way the hell over my head, I mean I'm so deep into it I cannot even see the light of day. At that point we can roll over and play dead or we can claw our way out of the hole we have gotten ourselves into and in every single case I have found we emerge a better person, you have to make an effort in order to succeed .
Regards
AC

Quote from: allcanadian on November 18, 2010, 12:47:36 AM
@ChrisCIf you look at history you will find some of the greatest inventions happened completely by accident while the inventor was investigating something entirely different. As such even though the people here may not have the required knowledge and may very well be delusional at least they are making an effort and that increases their odds of success by magnitudes compared to let's say someone like yourself who has probably never tried anything. Consider the lottery, the odds of winning are astronomical and yet "someone" wins every single week and they won  simply because they tried, they bought a ticket, increasing their odds by magnitudes compared to someone who did not. It should be obvious that nobody will ever win a lottery if they have no ticket and nobody will ever succeed at anything unless they actually try.
Personally, I have always learned the most valuable lessons and gained the most knowledge when I have jumped into something way the hell over my head, I mean I'm so deep into it I cannot even see the light of day. At that point we can roll over and play dead or we can claw our way out of the hole we have gotten ourselves into and in every single case I have found we emerge a better person, you have to make an effort in order to succeed .
Regards
AC

Very wise. The problem is, that people who refuse to change can not be changed. Although I agree with everything you have said, some wouldn't, not because they disagree with you, but rather that they refuse to change their stand point. Until a person is willing to see error unto him/her self, nothing will change.