Spinn_MP,

Khanster with only 2 posts under his belt has contributed more to this forum than your 187 posts, and this includes all of your posts under previous banned alias's.  You should be proud of yourself for nothing.  What a way to be.  Now, I see this leading to another distraction, which is what you do the best, so I once again will let you have the last word.

GB

Quote from: gravityblock on February 05, 2011, 06:55:44 AM
Spinn_MP,

Khanster with only 2 posts under his belt has contributed more to this forum than your 187 posts, and this includes all of your posts under previous banned alias's.  You should be proud of yourself for nothing.  What a way to be.  Now, I see this leading to another distraction, which is what you do the best, so I once again will let you have the last word.

GB

Lol, your anger seems - pristine?

Don't you worry, I truly like all that Greenhorn's knowledge of yours...
I'm sure you'll find your way to keep us informed... In the right way, of course.

Oh, GB... I wish you ALL the best!

A small particle of carboxy fullerene is placed on top of heat sensitive explosive. Irradiation with a 785 nm laser (1W) results in an instantaneous explosion.  In the absence of carboxy fullerenes, the laser with output power of (5W), failed to ignite the explosives.  ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJvh0yA69ow )

GB

On page 36 of "quantum cold case mysteries resolved" the mass of the electron is given as M-e=2Fmax*Rc/c^2. Can somebody explain how this equation is derived?

Quote from: tomd000 on February 05, 2011, 08:11:04 PM
On page 36 of "quantum cold case mysteries resolved" the mass of the electron is given as M-e=2Fmax*Rc/c^2. Can somebody explain how this equation is derived?

That paper is from Lane Davis and is not Znidarsic's work, although it is related.

F_max = 29.053N
R_c = 1.409 x 10^-15m
M_-e = 9.109×10^-31kg

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2+%28+29.053N+x+1.409+x+10%5E-15m%29+%2Fspeed+of+light%5E2

GB