Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



12 times more output than input, dual mechanical oscillation system !

Started by hartiberlin, November 30, 2006, 06:11:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 55 Guests are viewing this topic.

Omnibus

Also, when talking about violation of CoE one should never forget that violation of CoE is inherently present in the very heart of theoretical physics -- the Hamilton's equations -- as I have already shown.

Now the fletchers of the world like to blabber about competence. However, when it comes to real arguments they are nowhere to be found.

fletcher

Seriously omnibus - I know when you repeat what I've just said that you're rattled.

Are you embarrassed ? You should be ! - I'm embarrassed for you - You're giving moron's a bad name & soon they're gonna disown you !

-------------------------------------------

So ... Pe [mgh] = Ke

& Ke = 1/2 m v^2

Notice the element of velocity in Ke equation ?

So to help you with the answer - calculate the Pe loss.

Clue : that equals the Ke of the wheel after one cycle - work backwards to see if it matches the velocity you see & can measure  - sheesh, what an idiot !

P.S. don't confuse things with momentum !

Omnibus

Stop assaulting me undeservedly. Try to learn some physics first and then come here to do something more than blabbering.

What did you prove with these equations? Sheer nothing. Shall I call you a moron, then. No, because I'm a gentleman. I'll only ask you to learn physics before coming here and cluttering the thread with gibberish.

Omnibus

To be noticed once again. It is presumpuious to write Pe[mgh] = Ke because it goes against the experimentlal facts. Like I said, we see kinetic energy of two full rotations due to that small mgdeltaH. On the other hand, we see that the large mgH cannot bring about even one full rotation.

Slapping formuli frivolusly as fletcher does only serves to demonstrate his own incompetence and nothing else. If people such as fletcher want to prove their point of this device not being OU much much more is needed to be shown as a theoretical argument, not just slapping formuli frivolously.

I'll remind also, every time violation of CoE is discussed (independent of whether or not this particular case turns out to be OU in the end) that, contrary to what superficial people such as fletcher think, violation of CoE is inherently contained in the very heart of the standard theoretical physics -- the Hamilton's equations -- as I have already shown.

fletcher

Oh, but you do deserve it omni_moron !

Learn some mechanics & how to analyse things properly before pushing your incessant rubbish !