@ keykhin,

Glad to help.  .

@ chrisC,

The 900 is just a constant from combining two equations together. The first one was the formula to convert RPMs into a frequency value, which is

f = RPM / 60.

But this equation assumes only one magnet rotating past the coil per cycle, so you add the "Poles" variable to increase the frequency. So:

f = (RPM / 60) * Poles

Then, I took the standard equation for LC resonance:

f = 1 / [2*Pi* Sqrt(LC)]

and solved it for C. Then after substituting in the RPM equation and simplifying terms, that's how I got the final formula with the 900 in the top.

@TheCell,

The way I had the circuit setup in Mutisim, the Wattmeter instrument that I had measuring the input power was still reading 5kW or something (the same as the Java circuit simulator read before tuning it to resonance). The input side was not showing the reduction in input after tuning the circuit to resonance so I need to play with it a bit more to get it setup right. That's why I generally like the java simulator since it's simple to quickly test out ideas without spending a lot of time setting up the simulations properly. BUT, the most important thing was that the output waveform was shifted by 90 degrees when the output was tuned, which was the original purpose of running the simulation.

@teslaalset,

YES, the coil's inductance does change quite a bit as the magnet passes under it. Without the bias magnets on the back, the inductance of the output coil will typically drop as the magnet approaches and then rise as the magnet leaves. However, when the bias magnet is placed on the back of the coil such that the bias magnets' field repels against the rotor magnet, the inductance of the core can remain unchanged or actually rise when the rotor magnet passes by, depending on the positioning of the bias magnet.

What would be interesting is to see someone try this effect out on air-cored generator coils with no bias magnets  .

@ All,

Gotta run for now, will post more later.

- Jason O

Quote from: xenomorphlabs on June 13, 2011, 01:43:48 PM
Would it be possible for you to briefly describe how to transfer energy from one RLC stage to the next (at a different frequency) WITHOUT parametric variations/coupling? What would the stages have to be tuned to for this to work as you describe?
Interferences between circuits usually don't (fortunately) automatically transfer huge amount of energy, so what needs to be different?
Thank you

its important to realise the coils are produced in such a way as to ensure we do not produce any in phase power. In addition to ensure the coils themselves create no self magnetic flux. By creating an INVERSION of operation using methods as bifilar wound, poly-phase construction  terminated in Diode Plugs or out of phase coils to ensure the energy is in VARS but also highly Kinetic creating a dipole this creates a virtual capacitor in between the dipole centre or in the case of the muller where the rotor passes the air gap becomes a virtual capacitance layer. When this is correct the coil becomes a NEGATIVE INDUCTOR as does everything opposite to what you normally expect.

Now the coil absorbs ambient electron spin energy which creates an electrical current on the wires and instead of heating the coil it drops in temperature.  A permanent magnet is nothing more than an ambient energy portal and such is a localised energy source but you can not tap this directly without employing methods like magnetic modulators. See Floyd VTA 5kw 3 dimensional  Class C magnetic flux modulator drops ICE cold in operation.

But also these systems can work without any permanent magnet source.

TO understand there is no real frequency creating a resonance from electron spin think of it as relative pressure differentials. In such there can be no parametric resonance onto adjacent LCR coil systems but they WILL oscillate at whatever the adjacent LCR's are tuned to without parametric coupling in the conventional sense.  An ideal inductor only really requires a core suitable for the frequency of the highest permubility  material and taken to saturation so the collapsing flux puts current back to your coils without YOU having to put more energy than required to creates the conditions. This is how a negative inductor works.  A iron pipe can be made OU. 

Negative inductors can be greatly enhanced by providing a high electrostatic source to saturate the core material. HV at around 15Kv and 50Khz can be used to saturate say a ferrite core by applying a negative charge to the INSIDE a core and a positive charge to the OUTSIDE with very little power i/p  the ferrite  core responds by producing a very powerful collapsing magnetic flux and as a result can impinge on a bifilar coil wound directly on the inductor. Please note in highly saturated HV HF cores material undergoes nuclear transformation and it is no longer iron or  ferrite!! See GENESIS PROJECT. You are now poking the Devil with a big stick!!

This will be provide extremely powerful HF magnetic flux pulses and can coupled and be MODULATED by other RLC stages to provide additional COP isolation from the source to the load and provide any suitable output frequency that is desired. This is basically kapanadze.

What you are left with is a 60Hz sine wave within 50Khz carrier layer that just needs stripping using a low pass filter.

Quote from: Jdo300 on June 13, 2011, 02:31:45 PM
@teslaalset,

YES, the coil's inductance does change quite a bit as the magnet passes under it. Without the bias magnets on the back, the inductance of the output coil will typically drop as the magnet approaches and then rise as the magnet leaves. However, when the bias magnet is placed on the back of the coil such that the bias magnets' field repels against the rotor magnet, the inductance of the core can remain unchanged or actually rise when the rotor magnet passes by, depending on the positioning of the bias magnet.

What would be interesting is to see someone try this effect out on air-cored generator coils with no bias magnets  .

Forget about calculating a parallel capacitor and stick to the original concept:
- There is also current variation in the generator coils under load, influencing the flux in the ferrite cores and therefore the coil value. Nobody has a clue what the coil variations are during operation.
- There is probably no extra capacitor mounted parallel to each coil of the original rig of RomeroUK, otherwise he would have said that when he advised in having the circuit diagram in place. The only capacitance I can think of is the one that is caused by the stranded wire. Probably a few tenths of pF each.

@teslaset,
I agree.  Seems to me the last bunch of pages has a ton of great info.  and a lot of it I will use.  But extra caps that are nowhere to be seen in the videos or commented on  in the forum, though excellent, are a horse of different color .  Like I said tons of great info.  But as far as I can tell even in the pre release and the post release videos there are not 2 caps, or a whole bunch of mysterious theoretical components yet the speed up under load is happening.  I know so many of us are chomping at the bit to explain the unexplainable here.  There will be time for ya'lls Nobels later.  First lets make some machines spin.  then spin faster under load. 
   MY rotor design was a total failure.  I believe that I had magnets way to close together.  So back to square one.  If anyone has a suggestion as to how far to space 1x.75 in neo cylinders please speak up.  I will tell you that one magnet spacing is waaaaaaaay to close.  there is virtually no scalar south between the magnets.  I couldnt even get a Bedini circuit to trigger at all. 
   

the following circuit of a pendulum.
this circuit can run muller dynamo?
(sorry bad english google translate)