Quote from: hoptoad on September 09, 2011, 10:19:44 PM
Not true acceleration due to do increase in available power, just massive reduction in coil/core breaking effect.

Cheers

Exectly.

Has anyone ever tired rolling a core, instead of using straight laminates

http://www.ebay.ca/itm/Metglass-nanocrystalline-tape-MEG-generator-/310344151524?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4841f3f1e4

<sup>It is funny experience to watch this forum..
Some prick shows up claiming he has free energy - throw a little bone name "free energy" and a couple of lines in here to fuel the flames - and all these people go off the hook.. wasting their time and money on something fake.
 
If inventor comes here and does not disclose his "invention" in full - hes a SCAM - PERIOD. (I am yet to see a single case otherwise)
It was so OBVIOUS this guy was a scam from day one solely because he showed up and dissapeared. Inventor willing to help others and disclose his info would never do that. I have seen that before and this is just another case lol.

But then these newbies come in a start blessing useless crap (since they are new and dont have much understanding)  and silence or call trolls all the ones who try to expose this scam.

And this is repeating pattern. Even the projects. Most of them repeat again and again...

Like TC heins "acceleration" crap - this thing started years ago - has been debunked and EXPLAINED before - and yet it appearently still going on.</sup> 

@minde4000,

it could be true what you are saying but this single thread and some other ones are showing great progress. Who would even imagine that Lenz law can be delayed? Do they teach that in academia? I know some one shown a video from MIT that can explain this but this is not really thought.

It is thought a immutable law which we are proving to be incomplete. More we work on this more we will crack this.

Saying it does not work or it is impossible is useless and easy. So, let's get our hands dutty.

And BTW, this thread is still monitored by me and I will still change unrelated or negative comments.

Fausto.

ps: great video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QziS_o6gSnQ&feature=uploademail

Quote from: plengo on September 10, 2011, 12:17:29 PM
@minde4000,

And BTW, this thread is still monitored by me and I will still change unrelated or negative comments.
ps: great video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QziS_o6gSnQ&feature=uploademail

Ya I guess you do that..
I admit my expression in previous post was harsh but its truth. I am in no way trying  discourage anyones research  . Just trying to point out the facts maybe mistakes observed in person and by several other here. Not everybody likes that obviously.

When it comes to that video what I see he is explaining LCR reactances and different frequencies there (creates acceleration - there is no acceleration!! - isnt this stuff getting too old?). Its LC theories and equations. Of course inductor reacts differently to different frequency strength and duration of the signal. YES you can create resonant circuit with PM motor coils and caps wich will obey all rules the regular LC would obey driven by solid state driver. I have created parallel LC using 2H coil with 0.2uf cap. Upon reaching resonance coil+cap impedance became so high that heavy rotor almost jammed in place thus lifting one side of the setup like 10 inches. I became convinced that magnetic field amplification in PM motor LC system is very real.

I am all for discoveries and research. But I believe we should learn from mistakes and implement what we learn into our and other people feature projects. I believe that by pointing out certain facts however dissapointing they are is the right thing to do and should not be considered as a  "negative comments". These are facts from personal experience - not a crappy opinion or a scam.

With respect

Minde