Thanks Mw!

No problem Iota. Let me know what you think of this little device.

Initial magnetic field observations in process on my completed coil. Again, I am using what most consider the secondary coil, to create the magnetic field. This it does fairly well so far. Am able to observe strong field properties at the end of my iron bolt. So considering the distances involved, I am happy with it. This outer coil being wired in a series bifilar arrangment works(copper-copper). So at this point a magnetic field is being created in/around the inner copper-iron windings. And lo and behold, the electron pump finally makes itself evident. Stubblefield was damn smart....

Am observing very curious things in the reciever coil (copper-iron). I need to sift through the many observations. Building my overall coil like I did, allows for total experimentation to occur. Figuring out the activation coil was easy. The reciever coil is indeed mysterious in how it behaves in certain situations. I'll bag it though, just need some more time. I still see the pump, I just need to understand how to run it properly.

Please explain the particulars of applying power to the secondary.  Even if you don't understand it, please tell us what exactly you did so that we can learn from your experiences.
Thanks.  Keep up the good work!

As far as powering the 'secondary', it is simple, just put a voltage across it. This will eventually be done at a frequency. The 'secondary', if sized large enough, will create a very strong magnetic field through the 'primary iron windings + iron bolt serving as a core'. (I think an obvious future improvement here would be to upgrade the solid iron core with either bundled iron rods or a laminated affair like in a transformer. Or something in which field collapse happens completely and rapidly) My 'secondary' was wired series bifilar, thus it has good magnetic field production despite only being 5 layers of 24ga copper wire. Doing this is the easy part.

The iron winding is worthy of the most contemplation in this design. More info when I have the data.... As far as me building this thing in a so called backwards mode of operation. Don't sweat it. The patent isn't 'gold' in its final/current rendition. Stubblefield was forced to change it. No biggie... Nothing a little opposite thinking won't cure.

I need Tishitang right now. If anyone has heard from him or knows how to get in contact with him, let me know. I am getting close to radio time.

Heres a circuit he posted awhile back.

OK, here is my circuit on the Stubblefield Patent 600457

To understand the patent you have to understand resonant circuits.  To review:  A parallel res circuit multiplies the voltage.  A series res circuit multiplies the amps.  The Q of the circuit is the multiplier.

For example:  We have two ground rods.  The voltage between them is 1 AC volt at a small .002 amps.  Then if Q is the multiplier, we have 50 volts peak on the parallel circuit, and .100 amps on the series circuit.  If we could combine the two separate circuits, we would have a gain in power of 50 X 50 = 2500 all in theory.  If we were only 10 % efficient due to loads and losses, we would still have a gain of 250, not bad.  The bifilar coil in the patent is high Q construction.  It probably has a Q of 100 to 200.   So, you see the potential is there.to gain a lot of power even with a small input.

Stubblefield did not have diodes to play with in his day.  Unless he used an antennae, he would not be able to use a parallel circuit.  So, what did he do?  He used two series circuits to amplify the amps.  The two ground rods of their respective circuits would still remain at the one volt difference.  We are just pumping up  the amps.  He gets the gain in voltage by colliding the series currents into each other.  Notice the new circuit shows the ground rod pairs at opposite voltage to each other!

Have you ever watched boats in a lake coming in from opposite directions.  Each has a small wake.  But when the wakes collide, it sets up a few big high waves.   Same effect is seen when reflected waves meet the source waves.  You get higher and lower waves at a lower frequency as their energies mix and match or cancel each other.  these higher and stronger wave energize the collector coil wound around the bifilar pair in opposition.  This is our power gain.  Their must be an also unknown power gain by using one coil of iron.  The higher resistance of iron can possibly link with the magnetic field of the earth, or cause a phase shift that helps the amplification factor?  Or maybe has something to do with conditioning the space?

I have seen writings speculating on the make or break of the secondary (collector) coil.  This is a simple relay set up as a vibrator.  Here, it is normally closed.  I should have placed it next to its battery where it can be normally open.  When energized by the battery or separate EB, the coil of the relay opens and closes the contacts in a vibrating mode.  This works the same as hitting a bell with a hammer.   The bell will ring at its resonant tone.  It doesn't matter how you hit the bell or how fast or what kind of hammer.  It will still ring at the same tone.  A tuned resonant circuit acts the same as a bell.  The sharp pulses of the relay contacts will ring the circuits at their resonant frequencies automatically.   

To have this make or break in the patent only makes sense if you are using resonant circuits.  The same reason he used high Q winding techniques.  These are resonant circuits.  Everything points to it.

Even though the iron and copper coils are linked together as a bifilar winding, they can each have different resonant frequencies.  The make or break will ring them both.  Look back to the Q reference at the beginning of this thread and see the graph.  The higher the Q, the longer the ring.

This primes the pump, so to speak, and gets things going into resonance.  Then the battery and the relay are no longer needed.  You collect your power through the normally closed switch.  The pumping action conditions the immediate area.  The longer you pump the EB, the bigger your conditioned area will become.  You can add a feedback loop to sustain operation.  If earth currents shift or weaken, you can prime the pump again to get things going.  Once conditioned, it takes less energy to sustain the field.  To get it going again might be as easy as sparking the wire as you touch it to connect.

Knowing these principles, you can can design your own version of the patent.  It can be bigger or smaller.  Smaller means higher frequencies.  Bigger means lower frequencies.  Normally, the lower frequencies carry more energy.  I say start with what you have on hand to prove the principle.  Try and use natural insulation materials instead of plastic.  Fiberglass and resin are OK for insulation.  I have a feeling modern magnet wire is OK as long as the coating is not plastic. Be sure and use the wood ends and cotton wrap between layers of the coils and the core.  I will explain why later.

Before you bury your EB in the ground do the following:

Place the components on the ground and map the magnetic fields around  a five foot radius or whatever you have room for.  Write down, the direction the compass points as you walk around the spot.  See how close the compass has to be to attract to the iron, say 3 inches.  Then after you bury it and start your conditioning, see if it changes the magnetic field?   Magnetic field and orientation of the compass changes will indicate conditioning is happening and how far out it has expanded.  For example, the compass is now pointing to the iron at two feet away instead of 3 inches with the priming turned off.

I hope this helps us all in the search for cheap energy.
Tishatang