Quote from: chessnyt on October 02, 2011, 11:18:39 PM
@Poit:
Okay, here we go Poit.  Here’s your answer.  “…reaches market” are two words.  We first must decipher the first word (reaches) in order to make sense of the two words (reaches market) used together. 

Now “reach” in this context means to arrive at or get to (a place, person etc.) so then “reaches” in this case means arrives at or gets to.  A “market” in this case is a geographical region considered as a place for sales.  So then “reaches market” in this context means “arrives at a geographical region considered as a place for sales” (which just so happens to be the United States).

Now for the “in October” part of the thread title; something that arrives in October can arrive on any day of October and still arrive within this month.  October 6, 2011 is when it’s going to be tested by scientists from around the world.  The 1 megawatt plant is said to go into operation towards the end of October (that would be after the 6th of October 2011 just in case this is confusing for you, Poit).  So the commercial deal (transaction) is contractually finalized towards the end of October, 2011.  He will not be able to finish the sale until the product is completely installed thus technically, the technology (ready to operate) will reach the market towards the end of October.

I’m sorry for using such complicated English (big words) to title this thread.  I would have geared the wording down to the level of a first grader had I known prior to the posting of this thread that you possessed an inadequate vocabulary.  My apologies, Poit.  I’ll try harder next time.  I'm sorry I let you down.


Regards,
Chess

Thank you for the time spent replying to my post. I will ignore the antagonistic remarks at the end. Lets try and keep this civil? Truce?

Peter

Quote from: Poit on October 03, 2011, 12:01:06 AM
Thank you for the time spent replying to my post. I will ignore the antagonistic remarks at the end. Lets try and keep this civil? Truce?

Peter

@Poit:
Very well, Peter.  Truce it is. 


Regards,

Chess

From what I understand: October 6,2011
is the "scientific" test of one 10KW module
of Rossi's 52 module 1MW reactor. This
features the dual steam/water loop
calorimeter, plus other scientist's tests.

Near the end of the month of October will
be the full up 1MW reactor demonstration
test probably with less outside scientific
interaction and more of a product inauguration.
The demo of the first deliverable 1MW hot water
reactor. I suspect it will be somewhat easier
to determine the energy gain of it, but it will still need
to be done accurately to establish what are
reported to be 3.x times module gains. Of what
is still a rather hefty input feed energy.

---

And you know...he could possibly get competition!

A 150 module household heat pump "reactor"
(with a little more environmental air interaction
over Rossi's; nickel metal mining) could probably
do the same thing as his 1MW e-cat reactor. But I
estimate the price at only $750K and a physical
volume of three times Rossi's and maybe equal or
even better energy gain. So he may have to limit
the price of his magic and lean a little more on his
absolute cost savings, more then one might first
expect.

So, I guess there really is no free lunch.

:S:MarkSCoffman
   

Quote from: e2matrix on October 02, 2011, 01:49:45 PM
Sounds to me more like this is an inventor that is willing to do anything to get this out to the world and has avoided last ditch efforts by investors to do the usual screw job leaving the inventor with little or nothing.  A big Cheers for Rossi and prayers for him and the world that this succeeds as claimed.

@e2matrix:
Well put e2matrix.  I completely concur.  In addition to forcefully maintaining control of the technology, do you think that there were behind the scenes sellout offers he had to resist as well?   

Quote from: OscarMeyer on September 20, 2011, 11:51:34 PM
@chess
If what your anounsing is not cold fusion, then what do you call it? 

I want to know what kind of verification it has??

Thankx

@Oscar:
This is a good question Oscar because it has changed titles since the arrival of Ponds and Fleischman onto the scene.  The technology is now referred to as “Low Energy Nuclear Reactions” or LENR for short.  Rossi’s E-Cat technology is essentially a variation of LENR.

As far as the technology (Rossi’s E-Cat) having official “verification”; it does not.  During recent testing of the E-Cat, independent scientists pointed out “flaws” in the testing procedures and parameters.  This is what Rossi is intending to address on the new October 6th testing date. 

I hope this answers your questions.


Best Regards,

Chess