Quote from: Poit on October 07, 2011, 10:11:51 PM
My opinion for what its worth. People feel that they can get in on the action (with the "other" threads you talk of), where as, this thread they feel they are left out. They (my self included) feel like a pure observer, no schematics, no replications (with other members, diagrams, pictures etc).

As positive as all of this sounds, what will this technology eventuate to? Power stations at everyone's house? or maybe just a replacement power station to replace coal, nuclear, etc power plants.

So far things are looking pretty good for Rossi and the tests. I look forward to seeing the test data. Does anyone know exactly when that will be happening?

Poit

@Poit:
I never thought of it from that perspective Peter.  It does not have schematics that you can build or experiment with.  It’s not open source so the rights to the technology will be reserved.  All the exact details of the device have not been disclosed and are considered “confidential” by the inventor so your point is well taken.


Regards,

Chess

Quote from: Poit on October 07, 2011, 10:11:51 PM

So far things are looking pretty good for Rossi and the tests. I look forward to seeing the test data. Does anyone know exactly when that will be happening?

Poit

@Poit:
The site to download the results of the testing (as recorded by a computer monitoring the device) are at the following link:

http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3284823.ece

Half way down the article there are two links for a “detailed report” and “temperature data”.  I downloaded both files and one is in PDF format and the other is in Excel format.  They are too large for me to post here at OU.com.

The link referenced above may require using the translate feature from your browser.  The link appeared in Italian on my screen and I had to use my translate option in my browser menu to display it in English. 


Chess

Groundloop reported at O.U.R. forum it seems to be 300 watts in 2.3kw   to 2.6 KW out!

Chet
-----------

GroundLoop
Quote:
Good News:

"The results of the two tests showed a developed net power of between 2.3 and 2.6 kilowatts â€" of the order of a large stove plate. Input electric power was in the order of 300 watts."

http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3166552.ece

Bad News:

"Andrea Rossi, inventor of the ‘E-cat’, has terminated his agreement with the Greek pilot customer Defkalion. The planned launch of a one megawatt heat plant in October is now supposed to take place in the United States."

http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3228376.ece



@All,

Here is more information.

http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3264361.ece

GL.
-------------------------------


NEWS

It appears to me that Mr. Rossi is spending considerable time (understandably) protecting his reaction cell from being tampered with/ reverse engineered.

From his actions it seems that his intentions are to never let anyone else build an e-cat module, leaving the production of these to his own company. In the big picture this seems quite limiting in regards to widespread use of the technology.

If/when we get to the point where we move past the questions concerning the validity of the product, the next subject is the philosophy of the inventor. Does anyone here have insight about Mr. Rossi in this regard?

Quote from: ramset on October 08, 2011, 09:04:02 AM
Groundloop reported at O.U.R. forum it seems to be 300 watts in 2.3kw   to 2.6 KW out!

Chet
-----------

GroundLoop
Quote:
Good News:

"The results of the two tests showed a developed net power of between 2.3 and 2.6 kilowatts â€" of the order of a large stove plate. Input electric power was in the order of 300 watts."

http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3166552.ece

Bad News:

"Andrea Rossi, inventor of the ‘E-cat’, has terminated his agreement with the Greek pilot customer Defkalion. The planned launch of a one megawatt heat plant in October is now supposed to take place in the United States."

http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3228376.ece



@All,

Here is more information.

http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3264361.ece

GL.
-------------------------------


NEWS

@Chet:
As you stated in your posting, the over unity demonstrated by this technology is undeniable.  This is what the people around the world have been waiting for all these centuries yet it’s ironic that other threads (some even off topic from the subject of energy altogether) on this forum are more popular and active irregardless of the fact that no over unity is present.

@Everyone:
What you must all understand is that it was not Andrea Rossi’s idea or desire to install the self destruct mechanism in his reactor chambers’ designs.  Rossi was forced to do this by the patent office before they would issue him a patent.  The following link will better explain this in detail:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2732080/posts

Now it is important that everyone get behind this technology and help to ensure it reaches the masses.  This is not only about your future.  This is about your children’s futures and their children’s futures along with all the future generations to come.  We can’t let this opportunity die.  It may be centuries before another breakthrough such as this comes along if ever. 


Best regards,

Chess