Quote from: Magluvin on May 06, 2012, 07:40:47 PM
I had to watch it twice, due to the vulcan mind meld that flashing color globe to the right kept me looking away.  Mib mind erase device.  lol  it is very distracting. What is it?

Are you running the whole circuit from the cap, or just the signal gen?

Mags

The sphere, as you should know by now, is what is preventing the NERDs from testing anything.

It is the Tesla Quantum Frequency Longitudinal Linecaster, programmed with anti-NERD frequencies. You may have wondered why the NERD RATs haven't been able to post any tests or any other data of their own lately. Now...  you know why. As long as that thing is flashing, nobody in the entire southern portion of Africa will be able to test an overunity device. Not only that... if they do manage to test one somehow, perhaps by hiring a colorblind technician or sitting in a bismuth foil-lined Maxwell cabinet, it will give all the normal readings it usually does, only it won't be overunity any more.

There is no signal generator in use, nor has there been for some time. I  have been supplying Tar Baby with a strict DC voltage... and current.... to "simulate" the situation when the NERD FG is providing the lonnnggg negative-going gate drive pulses of 2 minutes or more in the NERD data ... in other words, DC. The capacitor here just provides this bias voltage (and current) until it runs out. The circuit is running on the 4 x 12 volt, 5 A-H batteries. Perhaps I  misspoke in the video when I said that the oscillations are "powered by" the capacitor. They actually only _relate to_ the capacitor. 

I'm sure that both voltage sources ... the main battery and the bias source -- each contribute to the total power sloshing around in the circuit during the oscillations.

The point that I'm trying to make is that there IS current supplied by the bias source, and it IS necessary for the oscillations, and there is NOTHING trying to recharge the bias source, and when the bias source RUNS DOWN due to the current being drawn from it.... the oscillations stop.

This of course is contrary to a handful of claims that Ainslie has made, but never demonstrated.

Rosemary:

QuoteI am NOT interested in YOUR discussion.  I've already explained that it's just a lot of hot air and bombast.  I am simply anxious to advise our readers why it is that the GROUND PIN of our PLUGS are required.  And why it is that without the GROUND PIN we will be exposing that machine to UNDUE RISK.

It's not hot air and bombast and in your statement above you are completely wrong again.   You are wrong.  Get it?

MileHigh

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on May 06, 2012, 10:33:34 PM
I am NOT interested in YOUR discussion.  I've already explained that it's just a lot of hot air and bombast.  I am simply anxious to advise our readers why it is that the GROUND PIN of our PLUGS are required.  And why it is that without the GROUND PIN we will be exposing that machine to UNDUE RISK.

Rosie Posie

Without the ground pin, the operator/user is exposed to undue risk, which is why the third ground pin is required by code.

Most universal off-line switchers (as in the LeCroy) are decoupled for transients across the line (and to reduce RF radiation from the switcher).  Some off-line switchers also include L1/L2 to G decoupling as well, but I have yet to see floating the ground on a piece of equipment adversely affect its operation.

PW

Guys,
This post has got me rolling.  What a pleasure to find something to laugh at.  It's hilarious.

Quote from: TinselKoala on May 06, 2012, 07:21:00 PM
It's a little scary when I see that a video I've posted gets some few views even before I've posted a link to it. Gratifying but a little scary anyway. I could never handle fame, not even fifteen seconds much less fifteen minutes of it.

It seems that our little Leon is rather frightened at the prospect of FAME which he thinks is imminent.  Golly.  Could someone please assure him him that there's no chance of this.  Unless of course it's in the context of a DR VEST. 

Regards,
Rosemary

@MH:

Yep, you are with it on all counts. The "hot setup" I envision will incorporate a simple 555 timer for clocking and an op-amp for offset adjustment and impedance matching as you suggest. I'm in the process of dreaming it into existence already but there are some considerations.

The requirement to produce the High-Heat mode correctly is what is the difficulty, and no doubt is part of what is holding up the NERDs as well. Making a positive going pulse with the 555 powered by the main battery to turn on the Q1 mosfet is no problem at all (unless as in some of Ainslie's scope shots it's damaged or missing.) But for there to be oscillations during the "off" portion of the cycle there MUST be a negative going excursion of the gate voltage, just as in the DC case.

This is masked in the Ainslie gate pulse traces because of the general "fuzz" on all the traces-- the feedback oscillations-- and also because of the voltage "floor" phenomenon that we have remarked upon before. That is, the FG is set to make a positive pulse turning on the Q1, but it is OFFSET negatively so that when the pulse turns "off" it actually drops below zero, going negative and producing the oscillations in the Q2 mosfets just as in the DC case. And you can't do this with a simple 555 timer powered from the main batteries-- you need something like the charge pump inverter, and I'm not sure you can even do it with op-amps off the main battery without such an inverter either.

Using a separate power source, no problem, you just float it and use an op-amp output stage to control the offset just like a FG. But using the main battery is still a bit of a sticky wicket, if circuit simplicity and minimum  component count are desired features.