@All,
MrWayne has a working device. Hd coukd put a live feed on the internet.
A liue feed would demonstrate his claims are valiid.
edit
If he has oter people build versions of his device, it cottld be considered that he is looking for answers as t6 why it does,t work. This is ojjay as long apr people know why Wayne ir letting them build his invemmtion I would have to think.

Happen to have my work laptop at home so I have access to Autocad.  Hope the attached can help some to see what I see.

M.

Hello all,
I apreciate the consideration.

Whats my motivation? That is a good question - I have had many people tell me what they think it is on this site - so let me answer for a change - again - good question.

My motivation as has always been - encourage the thinkers.

Some people live inside a book, or the knowledge contained within - others are wanderers, innovators, looking beyond what they are taught.

We all know that "new" fields of study are found outside the confines of the current education of the time.

Those that have not really looked into the "Travis Effect" have no idea that we are in a new frontier of uses for buoyancy.

Man and Flight, Man on the moon, Solar Energy, Lenar was beaten to a pulp just a few years back - and now how many companies thrive on these teschnologies.

New frontiers are forged by the those with a certain contenance, able to persist - where others are safe to avoid.

I support "extrodianry proof"  - History tells us that our intrepertaion of the Laws, our understanding of the books, grows - not from within itself - but from those that question, think, wander, dream.

I support both - that is why our company decided to go the hard route - instead of expecting people to jump on board and run in with support - we expected dream crushers.

But, as our support has shown - for every thousand put downs - a thinker emerges and says - Why not?
If it does work - how?

Those people begin to build - touch, measure - not with simulations from the books - ok..self fulfilling, but from physical experimentation, physical proof - the kind that the writers of the books did - observation.

From time to time, a new observation comes along - upsets things for a while - and the books get better.
As we have shared before - we have already passed three phases of scrutiny - and expect and welcome more.

Our Critical Skeptic said - "this work is changing the dynamic on which mechanical energy is understood" at least for those involved - for now.

My motivation, my friend - to help you and the others get past the mindsets such as we have seen on this site, like the ones I put below.

I know what I have, I know the positive results of the third party review so do nearly 100 others - we have had to know every step of the way - and I know that puts me in the positon of being the one person who is responsible and "knows" that all of these nay sayers are wrong.

Here is a short list of negativitey, poor logic, holding onto the known - attacking the wanderer - just from this site:

No one else has done it in the past - so it must impossible....

The Laws says it can't be done......so it is impossible (kind of makes you wonder why those people are here on an OU site - that surprised me last year - not anymore)

A guy in his garage without "My level of educaton" could not do it......
I didn't waste my time getting an education to believe you could do it...
A guy who goes to church can not be smart enough.............
He must be after money, greed, ...take him down.....
and many who - mine is better than yours so your must be insulted...
as well as If I can not do it then at least I can beat on yours.....
And my fovorite for the week:
Sure he has passed the design phase, engineer reviews, built a test module, built a perpetual running model, built a closed looped model, is being supported by severe skeptics - with continued critical review -
......but if he has trouble with a check valve in the new model that now runs a generator off excess hydraulic prodcution --- I won't waste my time looking...... (p.s. - do you increase the level of review when it doesn't work at the simple level?- thinkabout it)

We all have motivations - they are clear - we show them with our words, our support, our actions, and our lack of them.

I chose to support our fellow kind.

And thank all of you who have sent kind words, encouragment, and the like - you support the improvement of the quality of life for all mankind.

Wayne Travis

Quote from: mondrasek on June 10, 2012, 10:17:10 AM
Happen to have my work laptop at home so I have access to Autocad.  Hope the attached can help some to see what I see.

M.

VERY GOOD,
yes - cap lock on purpose!
Please send me this drawing - I want to use it in our power point - I could replicate the simplistic truth you demonstrated - but I want your version for credit.
Thanks you M.
p.s. you two steps from then end of this section of the design - very close well done.

Wayne

Sorry Wayne, I didn't save the .dwg file.  I only hit "print screen" so I could transfer to "Paint" and make a .jpg.  I'd be happy to redo it for you once I am back at work and have a real monitor!  Working off a laptop screen is painful.  I am sure your designers will attest that in CAD, monitor realestate is everything!

I believe I could put in the next two steps.  I didn't think it was necessary at this point.  I just wanted to illustrate how nesting the sections of a taller system is being done.

Thanks,

M.