Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 153 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 19, 2012, 02:20:41 AM
My dear little TK

You must believe what you want.  God knows you'll get no comfort from the truth.  But keep a watch on our own tests.  They'll be rolling - SOON.  And then you'll need to close your eyes really tight.  Because you'll not like what we're going to show you.  OVER AND OVER AND OVER.

Can't wait.
Rosie Pose

You are a lying hypocrite and after what I've just seen, you should be kicked off the internet completely with your lies and coverups. THAT SCOPESHOT HAS BEEN EDITED TO HIDE INFORMATION THAT IS CONTRARY TO YOUR CLAIMS, and I have uncovered this coverup. You should be ashamed of yourself. I cannot fathom the depths of dishonesty in your mind.

picowatt

TK,

The images in the edited paper look scanned (or, less likely, screen captures from a vid card with some bad memory).  Look at the "Mean" values, the numbers there have been clipped at the top and bottom as if the scanner was dropping lines.  The "Mean" values in fig 8 in the edited paper shows this even more clearly.

For whatever reason, the 'scope shots in the edited paper appear to demonstrate generational loss.  Possibly the original files have been lost. 

It makes more sense to me that the missing zero ref line is due to scanning errors.  It is strange that it only dropped that portion of the line scan, but the scanner is clearly demonstrating issues elsewhere in this and other figures.   

Besides, it would have made much more sense to edit the zero ref's for the gate drive signals in all the captures that clearly indicate Q1 is not functioning properly.  But even that would only make sense if one knew how to read the LeCroy and were aware of what the zero ref and offset numbers actually mean.

PW


Rosemary Ainslie

Dear picowatt and little TK

Your speculative excursions are considerably more entertaining than anything else in this thread.  The omitted zero reference lines were simply the result of a prior compression of the files.  This has now been corrected.

What ridiculous people you are.  Get a life for God's sake.

Rosie Pose

Guys - let me say this again.  IT IS SIMPLY NOT POSSIBLE TO CORRUPT THE DATA FROM OUR LE CROY.  WHICH IS PRECISELY WHY IT'S SUCH A SUPERB INSTRUMENT FOR TESTS SUCH AS THIS - ESPECIALLY IN VIEW OF THE CONTENTIOUS NATURE OF THOSE SCREENSHOTS.

Kindest as ever,
Rosemary


picowatt

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 19, 2012, 08:06:43 AM
Dear picowatt and little TK

Your speculative excursions are considerably more entertaining than anything else in this thread.  The omitted zero reference lines were simply the result of a prior compression of the files.  This has now been corrected.

What ridiculous people you are.  Get a life for God's sake.

Rosie Pose

Guys - let me say this again.  IT IS SIMPLY NOT POSSIBLE TO CORRUPT THE DATA FROM OUR LE CROY.  WHICH IS PRECISELY WHY IT'S SUCH A SUPERB INSTRUMENT FOR TESTS SUCH AS THIS - ESPECIALLY IN VIEW OF THE CONTENTIOUS NATURE OF THOSE SCREENSHOTS.

Kindest as ever,
Rosemary


In case you did not notice, I was defending you.

And you are indeed correct, the LeCroy does not lie.  So, in the FIG 3 of the first paper, what is the indicated gate drive voltage during the portion of the cycle wherein the FG output is a positive voltage?

Why is no current flow indicated by the CSR trace during this portion of the cycle?

If you need help reading the LeCroy, fax your FIG 3 to LeCroy and ask them what the indicated voltage is during the positive voltage portion of the FG cycle.  They will tell you its approx. +12 volts.

So, again, why is Q1 not turning on?

PW


picowatt

I did not really expect an answer.  They are rarely, if ever, forthcoming.

The Q1 not turning on issue can only mean that Q1 was either damaged or disconnected during the 'scope captures where no current flow is indicated during the cycle portion wherein gate drive is indicated as more than sufficient to turn on Q1.

This of coures would mean that all tests and discussions related to FIG3, FIG4, FIG6, and FIG7 would have to be dismissed as erroneous.

Interesting how FIG 5, made the prior month, indicates a sufficient gate drive to turn on Q1, and indeed, the CSR trace does indicate that it is turning on.

PW