Sorry.  I should have referenced this separately.

Quote from: TinselKoala on June 30, 2012, 05:10:49 PM
Now, since the FG puts one polarity at one wire and the other polarity at the other wire...Well, DO THE MATH.

If the function generator applies a negative to Q1 - are you conceding that it then applies a positive to Q2?  Because that is NOT what picowatt is claiming.

And this...

Quote from: TinselKoala on June 30, 2012, 05:10:49 PMOf course if you are using a DIFFERENT schematic.... why don't you reveal it? It would explain much that is currently unexplained. Pun intended.

Everything that needs explaining that relates to current is FULLY explained in our second paper.  Intrigues me you guys go to some considerable lengths to avoid mentioning it.

Rosie Pose

Is this an issue of different interpretation? [are there words being left out perhaps?]


The Gate and Source of a MOSFET ARE NOT connected [together]. This is a true statement.

The Gate and Source of a MOSFET ARE connected [to the circuit]. This is also a true statement.

Hi Poynty

Quote from: poynt99 on June 30, 2012, 07:29:15 PM
Is this an issue of different interpretation? [are there words being left out perhaps?]

The Gate and Source of a MOSFET ARE NOT connected [together]. This is a true statement.

The Gate and Source LEGS of a MOSFET are physically tied to the same structure. 

Quote from: poynt99 on June 30, 2012, 07:29:15 PMThe Gate and Source of a MOSFET ARE connected [to the circuit]. This is also a true statement.

Our Source leg of Q2 FLOATS and is NOT therefore connected to the circuit.  As per the schematic.

I think that's right
Regards
Rosie
added

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 30, 2012, 07:34:14 PM
Hi Poynty
The Gate and Source of a MOSFET are physically tied to the same structure. 

The Gate and Source of a MOSFET ARE NOT electrically connected [together]. This is a true statement.

That should be more clear now.

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on June 30, 2012, 07:27:50 PM
Sorry.  I should have referenced this separately.If the function generator applies a negative to Q1 - are you conceding that it then applies a positive to Q2?  Because that is NOT what picowatt is claiming.

And this...
Everything that needs explaining that relates to current is FULLY explained in our second paper.  Intrigues me you guys go to some considerable lengths to avoid mentioning it.

Rosie Pose

When the FG applies a negative voltage to the GATE of Q1, it is also appying a negative voltage to the Source of Q2.