Can you imagine claiming that you have a publication showing overunity performance, and you push this "paper" and its data and demand replication and all the rest... and you HAVE NO IDEA whether or not there are errors in the BASIC SCHEMATIC given with the paper, even though DOZENS of people have told you that there ARE errors and that it DOES NOT WORK as you claimed it does? After a DECADE?
Can anyone imagine that?

The woman is a willfull ignoramus. How hard is it to get a breadboard and stick seven dollars worth of components into it? EVEN AN EIGHT YEAR OLD CHILD COULD DO IT IN AN AFTERNOON, and use LEDs and her EYEBALLS to see whether I am right or I am wrong.

But Ainslie has no idea, included the circuit blah blah blah, and couldn't even use a standard representation of the 555 itself, instead drawing the pin FUNCTIONS instead of their numbers and using some weird organization that is difficult to read and decode. One would almost conclude that she is OBSCURING rather than revealing and facilitating, with ALL of her "publications", since they contain SO MANY SEVERE AND SUBSTANTIVE ERRORS as to completely invalidate them as they stand, WHETHER OR NOT she is even correct about her absurd "thesis".

@MH: Has she done the "Big Reveal" yet? I wonder what she's been reading about "me" and my transgressions.
Perhaps she'll pay some imaginary lawyers to send an expensive, toothless letter to the address that's been given to her. I hope she does; if it ever actually gets to me it will make a great graphic for the technical text I'm writing on the Dunning-Kruger effect.

And just so the lurking spree killers know: I keep three large aggressive barking dogs that WILL BITE, in and outside the house. There is ALWAYS someone home here, we have security cameras on all approaches, we live in a corner house and we know all our neighbors and we all watch out for each other. And this is TEXAS, we have a "CASTLE DOCTRINE" and a "STAND YOUR GROUND" law. Look those up, please, before you come calling.

@PW: the rx and the tx signals are always exactly in phase except for the phenomenon I described earlier, where the frequencies change at different rates and thus shift phase a bit, then correct back to in phase, and repeat. This shift is never more than 10 or 12 degrees by eyeball. When the supernova transition happens the frequency jumps down abruptly and the amplitudes go up; there is no way that I could tell if the jump is happening when the signals are maximally in phase or have slipped out by the 10 or 12 degrees when it happens because the frequency shift is so large, compared to the phase differences. A good DSO could do the measurement but the best I can do is video it as it happens, and I'll try to get that done this afternoon.
However, I'll be tied up for a bit, changing my name and moving to a different undisclosed location with all my equipment.

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 12, 2012, 07:54:30 AM
And just so the lurking spree killers know: I keep three large aggressive barking dogs that WILL BITE, in and outside the house. There is ALWAYS someone home here, we have security cameras on all approaches, we live in a corner house and we know all our neighbors and we all watch out for each other. And this is TEXAS, we have a "CASTLE DOCTRINE" and a "STAND YOUR GROUND" law. Look those up, please, before you come calling.

yeah i don't think the "lurking spree killers" are really gonna be too scared of a bunch fruity texans that can't even secure the border of their state...  and why would they come knocking on your door when they can just ambush you at the qwikmart down the block? or snipe you with a magnum .22 from 800 yards...    even in your paranoid confabulations and delusions, you and milelow are entirely asinine.

p.s. to the "lurking spree killers"... tinselkoala/alsetalokin's dogs aren't aggressive. just bring treats and they are your best bud.

@.99: Do you ever feel like you are starring in a Fractured Fairy Tale?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y12SFBe8Z8U

It appears that your correspondent has gotten all the good understandings that you have achieved, all muddled up again.

If I may poynt out two difficult areas that I see arising over and over again:

1: She does not understand that the mosfet is not acting as a SWITCH when Vgss is just barely enough to tickle it, but rather as a VALVE that can be partially open, having a resistance not of "zero ohms" like she thinks it does when ON, but rather having tens of ohms but still passing substantial current. She does not, in short, understand the critical linear operation mode of a mosfet, and this is critical to understanding her circuit's behaviour.

2: She continues to think that the GATE voltage must itself somehow "pass the gate" in the DC condition or not "pass the gate" depending on some conditions. She fails to realize that it is simply the CHARGE ON THE GATE STRUCTURE that controls the VALVE in the DRAIN-SOURCE conducting channel.

Perhaps the analogy of a Balloon in an Air Duct would be helpful. You have air that flows through a duct, and you have a balloon inserted into the duct, with a hose and a valve so that you can inflate and deflate the balloon. By inflating the balloon you close off the air duct to the passage of its huge draft of air... but the air that you put into or take out of the balloon itself is not involved with that air and doesn't mix with it. You can inflate the balloon more, or less. If more, then the main airflow in the duct is reduced. If less, then it's increased. This is exactly how the charge on the gate influences the drain-source channel in a mosfet: the electric field on the gate, from its applied voltage, "swells up" like a balloon and either blocks or allows passage of OTHER electric charge through the drain-source channel. Her vision of how a mosfet is organized internally and how it works... by FIELD EFFECT.... is seriously flawed and will prevent her from grasping what you are trying to teach... as you have no doubt noticed with today's latest from her.

What is particularly ironic.. and galling... is that I have covered these topics in detail with very simple and easy to understand demonstrations in my videos... which she refuses to watch and understand. The charge on a  mosfet gate demo, and the linear operation mode demo go hand in hand and are so simple that even an eight year old child should be able to grasp the concepts. But then again... an eight year old child doesn't already  know everything, so you have a chance to insert new knowledge. In Ainslie's case, the cup is already full, so anything you try to pour into it just spills over and makes a big mess.