Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Testing the TK Tar Baby

Started by TinselKoala, March 25, 2012, 05:11:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 157 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Ainslie said:
QuoteBUT THAT SOURCE LEG Q2 NEEDS TO BE ATTACHED TO THE FUNCTION GENERATOR's  TERMINAL.
AND she said;
QuoteLOSE THE CONNECTION OF Q2 SOURCE LEG to FG terminal.

Well, which is it then, you ignoramus? Connect it, or lose it?

Rosemary Ainslie

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 14, 2012, 04:01:00 AM
Get away from me, you disgusting ignoramus. If you cannot OR WILL NOT even draw a single simple schematic, you do not deserve to be in this discussion AT ALL.
I would like nothing better.  But then you would most certainly need to stop referring to either ME or OUR WORK.

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 14, 2012, 04:01:00 AMBOTH LEADS OF THE FUNCTION GENERATOR ARE ITS OUTPUT, for one thing. There is no such thing as a function generator "probe" and "terminal" or "plus" and "minus". There is SIGNAL, and SIGNAL GROUND or COMMON.
I take it that this is in line with your use of the term MOSFET and your losing battle with understanding the subtleties of a collective noun.  And how you wrestle with the problems of impedance which you forget to include in your measure of resistance.  And with your reckless and unprofessional malice that's paraded with all the misogyny of Blue Beard and sundry other sociopathic monsters.  And it's in line with your preference to even target Poynty - who has ONLY shown you sympathy.  And in line with your malice extended to really upright and highly competent experimentalists when they are guilty of doing nothing more than proving you wrong.  You are INDEED a piece of work.

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 14, 2012, 04:01:00 AMSince that is so confusing to you I have recommended using RED and BLACK for your FG output designations, as even YOU should be able to keep the colors of the alligator clips sorted in your feeble excuse for a mind.
There is NOTHING wrong with my mind.  I suspect my GER is considerably greater than your own - notwithstanding your anxious denials.  But since your own amounts to very little then that's hardly a boast.  Unlike you I have a professional training in at least 3 disciplines - and I'm a reasonably talented dilettante in at least 3 more. 

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 14, 2012, 04:01:00 AMAnd the issue that you are pretending to test has been settled in everyone's mind EXCEPT YOURS for a long time.
So you say.  Repeatedly.  And every time your say this you are WRONG.  I look forward to doing those demonstrations PRECISELY to prove you wrong.

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 14, 2012, 04:01:00 AMand we can all see that you are deliberately trying to warp .99's tests and demonstrations so that they can't actually test what you don't want them to test, because they will reveal FINALLY EVEN TO YOU that you have been wrong all this time about your conception of FGs and how they work.
THIS much is absolute rubbish.  Not that it's unusually so.  I am INTENSELY grateful to Poynty - because he is prepared to both explain and test.  Where you only deny - disclaim and distort.  He is PROFESSIONAL.  You are NOT.

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 14, 2012, 04:01:00 AMYOU ARE REPREHENSIBLE in your conduct in these matters, Ainslie. You should be totally ashamed of yourself.
ON THE CONTRARY. I am immensely proud of the fact that I've resisted your disgusting agenda - alone - and effectively - notwithstanding your disgusting tactics which far exceed decency - let alone forum guidelines.

Rosie Pose

changed inductance to resistance

TinselKoala

I have decided that it is impossible to have a rational discussion with Ainslie.

.99 was trying, and may still be trying, in spite of her constant garbling of his explanations and tests. More power to him. Everyone else that has tried to discuss things with her rationally comes up against the same insanity from her: she speaks her own language where words mean what she wants at the moment and might change in the very next sentence.

She has contradicted herself so many times and has misrepresented her work and the work of others so egregiously that one wonders how such a thinker could have survived at all in this modern world.

Well, I'm tired of it all.



I have posted the most significant and exciting thing that I personally have EVER SEEN on this forum: the portable wireless power transmitting system, which offers a lot of opportunity for education, fun, and yes... even understanding some of the principles that I see being fractured daily on various threads in this forum.  More than any other device that I've seen proposed or shown here or in just about any other "free energy" site, the transmission of power through space using induction as in the Black Briefcase or by capacitance as in the SassyClassE sstc offers TRUE OPPORTUNITIES to link up with that Wheelwork of Nature that Nikola Tesla talked about.

That's enough for me. Good night.



TinselKoala

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 14, 2012, 04:28:03 AM
I would like nothing better.  But then you would most certainly need to stop referring to either ME or OUR WORK.
I take it that this is in line with your use of the term MOSFET and your losing battle with understanding the subtleties of a collective noun.  And how you wrestle with the problems of impedance which you forget to include in your measure of resistance.  And with your reckless and unprofessional malice that's paraded with all the misogyny of Blue Beard and sundry other sociopathic monsters.  And it's in line with your preference to even target Poynty - who has ONLY shown you sympathy.  And in line with your malice extended to really upright and highly competent experimentalists when they are guilty of doing nothing more than proving you wrong.  You are INDEED a piece of work.
There is NOTHING wrong with my mind.  I suspect my GER is considerably greater than your own - notwithstanding your anxious denials.  But since your own amounts to very little then that's hardly a boast.  Unlike you I have a professional training in at least 3 disciplines - and I'm a reasonably talented dilettante in at least 3 more. 
So you say.  Repeatedly.  And every time your say this you are WRONG.  I look forward to doing those demonstrations PRECISELY to prove you wrong.
THIS much is absolute rubbish.  Not that it's unusually so.  I am INTENSELY grateful to Poynty - because he is prepared to both explain and test.  Where you only deny - disclaim and distort.  He is PROFESSIONAL.  You are NOT.
ON THE CONTRARY. I am immensely proud of the fact that I've resisted your disgusting agenda - alone - and effectively - notwithstanding your disgusting tactics which far exceed decency - let alone forum guidelines.

Rosie Pose

changed inductance to resistance

You are a damned liar and crazy as a loon to boot. YOU SAY THINGS THAT ARE MANIFESTLY WRONG, like your stupid claim that I don't take inductance into account, for just a single example. LOOK AT THE SPREADSHEET I POSTED MONTHS AGO, you disgusting liar. ANd.. .where is YOUR spreadsheet so we can see how well YOU accounted for your inductive reactance? Nowhere to be found.


YOU LIE WITH EVERY POST YOU MAKE and you do not deserve to be spoken to with anything other than contempt.

TinselKoala

Quote from: Rosemary Ainslie on July 14, 2012, 04:28:03 AM
I would like nothing better.  But then you would most certainly need to stop referring to either ME or OUR WORK.
When you retract your unsupported claims, correct your ridiculous math errors, and learn to talk about your subject with the correct terminology, and when you start respecting your betters and their educations... then I'll stop referring to YOU, you liar, and your WORK which is a combination of fantasy and delusions and outright lies. That is... never.
Quote
I take it that this is in line with your use of the term MOSFET and your losing battle with understanding the subtleties of a collective noun.
Contentless tripe. YOU don't even know what a mosfet IS. What does "Field Effect Transistor" mean, Ainslie? How is it different from Bipolar Transistors? You have no clue, you still think a mosfet gate can pass a DC current somehow ... but you DENY that they can pass AC. And your ridiculous statement about the plural noun "DATA", which I refuted with THREE DICTIONARY REFERENCES AND A QUOTE FROM A SCIENTIFIC EDITOR..... is just that: ridiculous, and once again shows your abysmal ignorance. DATA ARE, Ainslie. A DATA SET is. The DATA that go into a data set are PLURAL and take PLURAL articles, especially in scientific writing. LOOK IT UP for a change, instead of just making your absurd pronouncements, you arrogant ignoramus.
QuoteAnd how you wrestle with the problems of impedance which you forget to include in your measure of resistance.
This is such a lie that you have been repeating for months. It's really too bad that you are too stupid to download and open MY SPREADSHEET ANALYSES, where your ridiculous lie about my "wrestling" with impedance is clearly shown to be FALSE.
QuoteAnd with your reckless and unprofessional malice that's paraded with all the misogyny of Blue Beard and sundry other sociopathic monsters. 
You cannot point to a single instance of misogyny on my part, you ignorant old woman. Blue Beard Indeed! What a disgusting and stupid liar you are.
QuoteAnd it's in line with your preference to even target Poynty - who has ONLY shown you sympathy.
You cannot point to any place where I have been anything other than polite and respectful towards .99-- in STARK CONTRAST to the way you address him. In other words YOU LIE AGAIN about me.
QuoteAnd in line with your malice extended to really upright and highly competent experimentalists when they are guilty of doing nothing more than proving you wrong.  You are INDEED a piece of work.
None of your " competent" experimentalists has EVER proven that ANYTHING I've said or done is wrong. INDEED... they have PROVEN THAT I AM RIGHT, gmeast being just the most recent. YOU LIE AGAIN, you reprehensible liar.
Quote
There is NOTHING wrong with my mind.
As a professional psychologist, I beg to differ. You exhibit many classical signs of pathology. You are a pathological liar; you exhibit the Dunning-Kruger effect with textbook precision and astounding magnitude; and you have an idee fixe that is delusional and has no contact with reality. I suspect that you are bordering on psychosis due to your lack of reality-checking and your constant "responses" to things you evidently hallucinate other people saying. In short, you are as crazy as a bat in daytime.
By the way, your hospitalization record has been leaked. I'm not going to mention it again out of respect for ... your doctors. But you really should talk to someone about the leak ... having those records in the public view isn't going to be good for you in the long run.
QuoteI suspect my GER is considerably greater than your own - notwithstanding your anxious denials. 
Nobody but you knows what you mean by that one, Ainslie. GER? Do you mean the GRE, the GRADUATE RECORD EXAMINATION, which college GRADUATES must take in order to get into PhD programs in GRADUATE SCHOOL, and which is accepted by MENSA as a vetting exam for membership in their organization? YOU have no GRE scores to compare, since you never attended a college at all, much less graduated. If you are referring to some kind of "intelligence test" comparison ... bring it on, you and me, no calculators allowed, Mensa or the GRE or any other standardized test. You are fairly bright for an autodidact, but you are abysmally undereducated and naive about the world... and you can't add or subtract without a calculator, much less solve a basic algebra problem or an analogy test. You cannot even tell the difference between "its" and "it's".
QuoteBut since your own amounts to very little then that's hardly a boast. 
Look up what a GRE score of 1548 means, Ainslie.
QuoteUnlike you I have a professional training in at least 3 disciplines
UNLIKE ME? Ainslie, I have credentials and professional qualifications that you can only dream about. YOU on the other hand, ... have no education, no college degree, no professonal licenses, nothing but a "thesis" that is a delusion and a fantasy. What are your "disciplines", cosmetology, waitressing and life drawing? You are a joke. Your credentials cannot compare with mine. YOU DON"T EVEN HAVE THE PREREQUISITES TO ENTER A TRAINING PROGRAM TO BECOME QUALIFIED IN SOME OF THE AREAS WHERE I HOLD CERTIFICATIONS. You make claims that you once again CANNOT SUPPORT.
Quote- and I'm a reasonably talented dilettante in at least 3 more. 
SO stick to the things you know, because you are abysmally ignorant and an incompetent nincompoop when it comes to basic electronics.
Quote
So you say.  Repeatedly.  And every time your say this you are WRONG.  I look forward to doing those demonstrations PRECISELY to prove you wrong.
You have never once been able to SHOW that I am wrong, you only claim it. Well, AINSLIE, you are PURPLE and have Three Ugly Horns on your head. And I claim that with the same authority that you claim I am "wrong". But.. YOU are WRONG all the time, and I always point to PROOF that you are. Like "PER NEVER MEANS DIVISION". You are indeed an idiot.
Quote
THIS much is absolute rubbish.  Not that it's unusually so.  I am INTENSELY grateful to Poynty - because he is prepared to both explain and test.
You should be grateful to him because he's teaching you what you should have known from the beginning. And I can point to DOZENS of times when you have insulted and denigrated him, most recently just yesterday. YOU LIE AGAIN,  as usual.
QuoteWhere you only deny - disclaim and distort. 
I DEMONSTRATE and PROVE what I disclaim, and YOU are the QUEEN OF DISTORTION, you unbelievable hypocrite.
QuoteHe is PROFESSIONAL.  You are NOT.
It doesn't take a professional to see through you, Ainslie. ANY sophomore EE student that paid attention in class can do it... and do do it. .99 is doing an admirable job withstanding your hurricane of crap. I hope he does succeed in teaching you something... but I doubt he will be able to, because YOU KNOW IT ALL ALREADY.
Quote
ON THE CONTRARY. I am immensely proud of the fact that I've resisted your disgusting agenda - alone - and effectively - notwithstanding your disgusting tactics which far exceed decency - let alone forum guidelines.
Pride goeth before a fall, Ainslie. You are indeed proud, way past the point of extreme obnoxious arrogance. And Pride is indeed one of the seven capital sins.

Quote

Rosie Pose

changed inductance to resistance

But you cannot change your hypocrisy and error into anything worthwhile, or worthy of anything other than the deepest contempt.